Previous research has shown that the personalities of both partners are associated with the qualities of their romantic relationship. This study extends this literature by examining whether or not reports of negative relationship interactions mediate the effects of personality traits on judgments of relationship satisfaction and quality. Participants were 337 couples from the Family Transitions Project who completed a comprehensive personality questionnaire and several scales measuring relationship behaviors and satisfaction. Negative Emotionality and Communal Positive Emotionality were related to both self- and partner reports of relationship satisfaction. These associations were substantially mediated by negative relationship interactions. Discussion furthers the ongoing rapprochement between intrapersonal and interpersonal approaches to the study of romantic relationships.
Caughlin, J.P., Huston, T.L., & Houts, R.M. (2000). How does personality matter in marriage? An examination of trait anxiety, interpersonal negativity, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 326—336.
2.
Conger, R.D., & Conger, K.J. (2002). Resilience in Midwestern families: Selected findings from the first decade of a prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 361—373.
3.
Cooper, M.L., & Sheldon, M.S. (2002). Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: Substantive and methodological trends over time. Journal of Personality, 70, 783—812.
4.
Donnellan, M.B., & Conger, R.D., & Bryant, C.M. (2004). The Big Five and enduring marriages. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 481—504.
5.
Donnellan, M.B., Larsen-Rife, D., & Conger, R.D. (2005). Personality, family history, and competence in early adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 562—576.
6.
Funder, D.C. (1991). Global traits: A Neo-Allportian approach to personality . Psychological Science, 2, 31—39.
7.
Gottman, J.M. (1998). Psychology and the study of the marital processes. Annual Review ofPsychology, 49, 169—197.
8.
Johnson, J.A. (1997). Units of analysis for the description and explanation of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 73—93). New York: Academic Press.
9.
Karney, B.R., & Bradbury, T.N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research . Psychological Bulletin,118, 3—34.
10.
Kelly, E.L., & Conley, J.J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 27—40.
11.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York : Guilford.
12.
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E.C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304—326.
13.
McCartney, K., & Rosenthal, R. (2000). Effect size, practical importance, and social policy for children. Child Development, 71, 173—180.
14.
Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family , 45, 141—151.
Ozer, D.J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediciton of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401—421.
17.
Patrick, C.J., Curtin, J.J., & Tellegen, A. (2002). Development and validation of a brief form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 14, 150—163.
18.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717—731.
19.
Rindfuss, R.R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28, 493—512.
20.
Roberts, B.W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T.E. (2001). The kids are alright: Growth and stability in personality development from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 670—683.
21.
Robins, R.W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T.E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners' personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 251—259.
22.
Tellegen, A. (1991). Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence, and assessment. In W. M. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology, Volume 2: Personality and psychopathology (pp. 10—35). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality, 68, 413—449.
24.
Watson, D., Klohnen, E.C., Casillas, A., Nus Simms, E., Haig, J., & Berry, D.S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72, 1029—1068.
25.
Zentner, M.R., (2005). Ideal mate personality concepts and compatibility in close relationships: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 242—256.
