Using Giddens's (1984) structuration theory, this study explored the communicative processes surrounding the divorce decree in coparenting relationships in stepfamilies. Participants included 21 adults who were coparenting children in stepfamilies who completed diary entries of all interactions with coparents over a 2-week period, and who completed follow-up interviews. Results revealed two structures of signification with respect to the divorce decree that enabled and constrained coparenting interactions. The first signification structure was one in which the decree was framed as a legal document, dictating the rights and responsibilities of parenting, especially with respect to child access and financial issues. The second signification structure was one in which the decree was viewed as a negotiating guide for more informal coparental decision-making processes.
Ahrons, C. R. , & Wallisch, L. (1987). Parenting in the binuclear family: Relationships between biological and stepparents. In K. Pasley & M. Ihinger-Tallman (Eds.), Remarriage and stepparenting: Current research and theory (pp. 225–256). New York: Guilford Press .
2.
Amato, P. R. , Loomis, L. , & Booth, A. (1995). Parental divorce, marital conflict, and offspring well-being during early adulthood . Social Forces, 73, 895–915 .
3.
Baxter, L. A. , & Babbie, E. (2004). The basics of communication research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning .
4.
Bochner, A. P. (1985). Perspectives on inquiry: Representation, conversation, and reflection. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 27–58). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications .
5.
Braithwaite, D. O. , McBride, M. C. , & Schrodt, P. (2003). ‘Parent teams’ and the everyday interactions of coparenting in stepfamilies . Communication Reports, 16, 93–111 .
6.
Christensen, D. H. , & Rettig, K. D. (1995). The relationship of remarriage to post-divorce coparenting . Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 24, 73–88 .
7.
Cole, C. L. , & Cole, A. L. (1999). Boundary ambiguities that bind former spouses together after children leave home in post-divorce families . Family Relations, 48, 271–272 .
8.
Coleman, M. , Ganong, L. H. , & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1288–1307 .
9.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
10.
Giddens,A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
11.
Graham, E. E. (1997). Turning points and commitment in post-divorce relationships . Communication Monographs, 64, 351–367 .
12.
Graham, E. E. (2003). Dialectic contradictions in postmarital relationships . The Journal of Family Communication, 3, 193–214 .
13.
Hardesty, J. L. , & Ganong, L. H. (in press). How women make custody decisions and manage coparenting with abusive former husbands . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
14.
Kline, M. , Tschann, J. M. , Johnston, J. R. , & Wallerstein, J. S. (1989). Children's adjustment in joint and sole physical custody families . Developmental Psychology, 25, 430–438 .
15.
Krone, K. J. , Schrodt, P. , & Kirby, E. L. (2006). Structuration theory: Promising directions for family communication research. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 293–308). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
16.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
17.
Leach, M. A. , & Braithwaite, D. O. (1996). A binding tie: Supportive communication of family kinkeepers . Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 200–216 .
18.
Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications .
19.
Lindlof,T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
20.
Maccoby, E. E. , & Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
21.
Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
22.
Poole, M. S. (1999). Group communication theory. In L. R. Frey , D. S. Gouran , & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 37–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
23.
Poole, M. S. , Seibold, D. R. , & McPhee, R. D. (1996). The structuration of group decisions. In M. S. Poole & R. Y. Hirokawa (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed.) (pp. 114–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
24.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston .
25.
Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
26.
Whiteside, M. F. (1998). The parental alliance following divorce: An overview . Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 3–24 .
27.
Wolchik, S. A. , & Fenaughty, A. M. (1996). Residential and nonresidential parents' perspectives on visitation problems . Family Relations, 45, 230–237 .
28.
Zimmerman, D. H. , & Weider, D. L. (1977). The diary: Diary interview method . Urban Life, 5, 479–498 .
29.
Zimmerman, D. H. , & Weider, D. L. (1983). The diary: Diary interview method–An approximation to direct observation in field research. In R. B. Smith & P. K. Manning (Eds.), A handbook of social science methods. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger .
