Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study tested the degree to which disagreement in perceptions of stepfamily communication and functioning is associated with the mental health of family members. Participants included 119 stepfamily triads from two different regions of the United States. Results indicate that stepfamily dissension and avoidance are inversely associated with the mental health of family members, whereas stepfamily involvement, flexibility, and expressiveness are positively associated with mental health. Disagreement in family members’ perceptions of stepfamily dissension is negatively associated with the mental health of both adults, whereas disagreement in perceptions of stepfamily involvement is inversely associated with the mental health of stepchildren. The results extend efforts to identify communication behaviors that differentiate strong stepfamilies from those struggling with the developmental process.

Keywords

Avoidance dissension expressiveness flexibility involvement mental health stepfamily communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baxter

L. A.

Braithwaite

D. O.

Nicholson

J. H.

(1999). Turning points in the development of blended families. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599163002

Braithwaite

D. O.

Baxter

L. A.

Harper

(1998). The role of rituals in the management of dialectical tension of “old” and “new” in blended families. Communication Studies, 48(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979809368523

Braithwaite

D. O.

Olson

Golish

Soukup

Turman

(2001). Developmental communication patterns of blended families: Exploring the different trajectories of blended families. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880128112

Braithwaite

D. O.

Toller

Daas

Durham

Jones

(2008). Centered but not caught in the middle: Stepchildren's perceptions of dialectical contradications in the communication of co-parents. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880701799337

Dornbusch

S. M.

Mont-Reynaud

Ritter

P. L.

Chen

Steinberg

(1991). Stressful events and their correlates among adolescents of diverse backgrounds. In Colten

M. E.

Gore

(Eds.), Adolescent stress: Causes and consequences (pp. 111–130). Aldine De Gruyter.

Fine

M. A.

Coleman

Ganong

L. H.

(1998). Consistency in perceptions of the step-parent role among step-parents, parents, and stepchildren. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), 811–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598156006

Galvin

(2006). Diversity’s impact on defining the family: Discourse-dependence and identity. In Turner

L. H.

West

(Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 3–19). Sage.

Ganong

L. H.

Coleman

(2004). Stepfamily relationships: Development, dynamics, and interventions. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Ganong

Coleman

(2017). Stepfamily relationships: Development, dynamics and interventions. Springer.

10.

Ganong

Jensen

Sanner

Russell

Coleman

Chapman

(2019). Linking stepfamily functioning, marital quality, and steprelationship quality. Family Relations, 68(4), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12380

11.

Golish

T. D.

(2003). Stepfamily communication strengths: Understanding the ties that bind. Human Communication Research, 29(1), 41–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00831.x

12.

Heider

(1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.

13.

Herrera

Martínez-Pampliega

Alvarez

(2020). Family communication, adaptation to divorce and children’s maladjustment: The moderating role of coparenting, Journal of Family Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1723592

14.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

15.

Jensen

T. M.

(2017). Constellations of dyadic relationship quality in stepfamilies: A factor mixture model. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(8), 1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000355

16.

Jensen

T. M.

Lippold

M. A.

(2018). Patterns of stepfamily relationship quality and adolescents’ short-term and long-term adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(8), 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000442

17.

Kline

R. B.

(2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford.

18.

Koerner

A. F.

Schrodt

(2014). An introduction to the special issue on family communication patterns theory. Journal of Family Communication, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.857328

19.

Laing

R. D.

Phillipson

Lee

A. R.

(1966). Interpersonal perception: A theory and a method of research. Springer-Verlag.

20.

Little

T. D.

(1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3

21.

Little

T. D.

Card

N. A.

Slegers

D. W.

Ledford

E. C.

(2007). Representing contextual effects in multiple-group MACS models. In Little

T. D.

Bovaird

J. A.

Card

N. A.

(Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 121–147). Erlbaum.

22.

Little

T. D.

Cunningham

W. A.

Shahar

Widaman

K. F.

(2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1

23.

Little

T. D.

Rhemtulla

Gibson

Shoemann

A. M.

(2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266

24.

McLaren

Sillars

(2020). Parent and adolescent conversations about hurt: How interaction patterns predict empathic accuracy and perceived understanding. Communication Monographs. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1722848

25.

McLeod

J. M.

Chaffee

S. H.

(1973). Interpersonal approaches to communication research. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 469–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427301600402

26.

Newcomb

T. M.

(1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review, 60(6), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063098

27.

Olson

D. H.

(2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00144

28.

Olson

D. H.

(2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x

29.

Papernow

(2013). Surviving and thriving in stepfamily relationships. Routledge.

30.

Pirutinsky

Kor

(2013). Relevance of the circumplex model to family functioning among orthodox Jews in Israel. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 10(2), 25–38.

31.

Rada

Olson

D. H.

(2016). Circumplex model of marital and family systems (FACES III) in Romania. Annuaire Roumain d’Anthropologie, 53, 11–29.

32.

Raley

R. K.

Sweeney

M. M.

(2020). Divorce, repartnering, and stepfamilies: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12651

33.

Schrodt

(2005). Family communication schemata and the circumplex model of family functioning. Western Journal of Communication, 69(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310500305539

34.

Schrodt

(2006a). A typological examination of communication competence and mental health in stepchildren. Communication Monographs, 73(3), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750600873728

35.

Schrodt

(2006b). Development and validation of the Stepfamily Life Index. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(3), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506064210

36.

Schrodt

(2006c). The stepparent relationship index: Development, validation, and associations with stepchildren’s perceptions of stepparent communication competence and closeness. Personal Relationships, 13(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00111.x

37.

Schrodt

(2014). Discourse-dependence, relational ambivalence, and the social construction of stepfamily relationships. In Baxter

L. A.

(Ed.), Remaking “family” communicatively (pp. 157–174). Peter Lang.

38.

Schrodt

(2016a). Coparental communication with nonresidential parents as a predictor of children’s feelings of being caught in stepfamilies. Communication Reports, 29(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2015.1020562

39.

Schrodt

(2016b). Relational frames as mediators of everyday talk and relational satisfaction in stepparent-stepchild relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514568751

40.

Schrodt

(2020). Identity, relational solidarity, and stepfamily communication. In Soliz

Colaner’s

C. W.

(Eds.), Family communication: Engaging identity and difference. Peter Lang.

41.

Turkdogan

Duru

Balkis

(2019). Circumplex model of family functioning in Turkish culture: Western family systems model in a Eurasian country. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 50(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.50.2.005

42.

Waldron

V. R.

Braithwaite

D. O.

Oliver

B. M.

Kloeber

D. N.

Marsh

(2018). Discourses of forgiveness and resilience in stepchild-stepparent relationships. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(5), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1530447

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB

Disagreement in perceptions of stepfamily communication and functioning: Implications for mental health

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material