The current study proposes that recipients' aversive reactions to complaints are a function of perceived face threat. One hundred and ninety-nine college students completed a survey asking them to describe in detail a recent complaint they had received from a friend or romantic partner, and to describe their response to that complaint. Respondents completed measures designed to assess their reactions to the complaint, including perceived face threat, negative affect, fairness, and damage to the relationship. As predicted, dispositional complaints were perceived to be more face threatening than nondispositional complaints, and complaints delivered in public were more face threatening than complaints delivered in private. Both positive and negative face threat were associated with the complaint recipient's anger/hurt and defensiveness. Perceptions of positive face threat also were associated with perceptions of less fairness and greater perceived damage to the relationship, whereas perceived threat to negative face predicted the recipient's feelings of embarrassment and anxiety/depression. The findings indicate that the face-threatening nature of complaints is associated with adverse relational consequences. Perceived threats to positive face, which tend to convey relational devaluation, were more strongly associated with relational damage than were threats to negative face.
Alberts, J. K. (1988). An analysis of couples' conversational complaints. Communication Monographs, 55, 184-197.
2.
Alberts, J. K. (1989a). A descriptive taxonomy of couples' complaint interactions. The Southern Communication Journal, 54,125-143.
3.
Alberts, J. K. (1989b). Perceived effectiveness of couples' conversational complaints. Communication Studies, 40,280-291.
4.
Alberts, J. K. , & Driscoll, G. (1992). Containment versus escalation: The trajectory of couples' conversational complaints. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 394-412.
5.
Alicke, M. D. , Braun, J. C., Glor, J. E., Klotz, M. L., Magee, J., Sederholm, H., & Siegel, R. (1992). Complaining behaviors in social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 286-295.
6.
Argyle, M. , & Henderson, M. (1984). The rules of friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 211-237.
7.
Baron, R. A. (1989). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 21-31). New York: Praeger.
8.
Bies, R. J. , & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199-218.
9.
Bies, R. J. , Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault?Communication Research, 15, 381-399.
10.
Braaten, D. O. , Cody, M. J., & DeTienne, K. B. (1993). Account episodes in organizations: Remedial work and impression management. Management Communication Quarterly, 6, 219-250.
11.
Bradbury, T. N. , & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3-33.
12.
Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Carson, C. L. , & Cupach, W. R. (2000). Facing corrections in the workplace: The influence of perceived face threat on the consequences of managerial reproaches. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28,215-234.
14.
Cody, M. J. , & Braaten, D. O. (1992). The social-interactive aspects of account-giving. In M. L. McLaughlin, M. J. Cody, & S. J. Read (Eds.), Explaining one's self to others: Reason-giving in a social context (pp. 225-243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Cody, M. J. , & McLaughlin, M. L. (1985). Models for the sequential construction of accounting episodes: Situational and interactional constraints on message selection and evaluation. In R. L. Street & J. N. Cappella (Eds.), Sequence and pattern in communicative behavior (pp. 50-69). Baltimore, MD: Arnold.
16.
Cupach, W. R. , & Messman, S. J. (1999). Face predilections and friendship solidarity. Communication Reports, 12, 13-19.
17.
Cupach, W. R. , & Metts, S. (1994). Facework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Goffman, E. (1967). 'On face-work.'Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior (pp. 545). New York: Pantheon Books.
19.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179-196.
21.
Kowalski, R. M. , & Erickson, J. R. (1997). Complaining: What's all the fuss about? In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 91-110). New York: Plenum Press.
22.
Leary, M. R. , & Springer, C. A. (2001). Hurt feelings: The neglected emotion. In R. Kowalski (Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships (pp. 151-175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
Leary, M. R. , Springer, C., Negel, L., Ansell, E., & Evans, K. (1998). The causes, phenomenology, and consequences of hurt feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1225-1237.
24.
Lim, T. S. (1994). Facework and interpersonal relationships. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues (pp. 209-229). New York: State University of New York Press.
25.
Lim, T. S. , & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Facework: Solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415-450.
26.
Miller, R. S. (1996). Embarrassment: Poise and peril in everyday life. New York: Guilford Press.
27.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organization justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
28.
Peterson, D. R. (1983). Conflict. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 360-396). New York: Freeman.
29.
Potter, W. J. , & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27,258-284.
30.
Schönbach, P. (1990). Account episodes: The management or escalation of conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Sprecher, S. , & Sedikides, C. (1993). Gender differences in perceptions of emotionality: The case of close heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 28, 511-530.
32.
Tracy, K. , & Tracy, S. J. (1998). Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing face and face attack. Human Communication Research, 25,225-251.
33.
Tracy, K. , Van Dusen, D., & Robinson, S. (1987). 'Good' and `bad' criticism: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Communication, 37(2), 46-59.
34.
Trees, A. R. , & Manusov, V. (1998). Managing face concerns in criticism: Integrating nonverbal behaviors as a dimension of politeness in female friendship dyads. Human Communication Research, 24, 564-583.
35.
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints and apologies. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
36.
Vangelisti, A. L. (1994). Messages that hurt. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 53-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
Vangelisti, A. L. (2001). Making sense of hurtful interactions in close relationships. In V. Manusov & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Attribution, communication behavior, and close relationships (pp. 38-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Vangelisti, A. L. , & Young, S. L. (2000). When words hurt: The effects of perceived intentionality on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 393-424.
39.
Witteman, H. (1992). Analyzing interpersonal conflict: Nature of awareness, type of initiating event, situational perceptions, and management styles. Western Journal of Communication, 56,248-280.
