This study investigates how informal third parties, such as friends and family members, may play a role in couple conflict as perceived supporters or critics of partners' conflicting positions. We examine who partners perceive to be supporters and critics and how beliefs about supporters and critics are related to partners' views of the conflict. In a sample of 98 dating couples, parents and close friends were equally likely to be perceived as critics, but close friends were more likely than parents to be perceived as supporters. In general, partners saw their primary supporters among their same-sex friends in their own, rather than the couple's joint, network. Thinking of one's own position as legitimate was correlated, for women, with the presence of supporters, and for men, with the absence of critics. Finally, the extent to which partners had separate, as opposed to joint, networks of significant others was systematically related to their preferred conflict management strategies.
Argyle, M. , & Furnham, A. (1983). Sources of satisfaction and conffict in long-term relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 481-493.
2.
Baumgartner, M. P. (1993). Violent networks: The origins and management of domestic conflict. In R. B. Felson & J. T. Tedeschi (Eds.), Aggression and violence (pp. 209-231). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
Black, D. , & Baumgartner, M. P. (1993). Toward a theory of the third party. In D. Black (Ed.), The social structure of right and wrong (pp. 95-124). San Diego: Academic Press.
4.
Broese van Groenou, M. , van Sonderen, E., & Ormel, J. (1990). Test-retest reliability of personal network delineation. In C. P. M. Knipscheer & T. C. Antonucci (Eds.), Social network research (pp. 121-136). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
5.
Bryant, C. M. (1996). Subcultural variations in the social network support of latinos, African Americans, and anglos: What is the association between the development of heterosexual relationships and the support of friends and family members? Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
6.
Burger, E. , & Milardo, R. M. (1995). Marital interdependence and social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 403-415.
7.
Canary, D. J. , Cupach, W.R., & Messman, S. J. (1995). Relationship conflict. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Counts, D. A. , Brown, J., & Campbell, J. (1992). Sanctions and sanctuary. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
9.
Cohen, S. , & Willis, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
10.
Crohan, S. E. , & Antonucci, T. C. (1989). Friends as a source of social support in old age. In R. Adams & R. Blieszner (Eds.), Older adult friendship (pp. 129-146). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Driscoll, R. , Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 1-10.
12.
Gottman, J. (1994). Why marriages succeed or fail. New York: Simon & Schuster.
13.
Harrison, K. (1998). Rich friendships, affluent friends: Middle-class practices of friendship. In R. Adams & G. Allan (Eds.), Placing friendship in context (pp. 92-116). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Healey, J. G. , & Bell, R. A. (1990). Effects of social networks on individuals' responses to conflicts in friendship. In D. D. Cahn (Ed.), Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 121-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Helms-Erikson, H. (1999, November). Marriage and friendship: Marital quality and spouses' marriage work with close friends and each other. Paper presented at the 61st annual conference of the National Council on Family Relations, Irvine, CA.
16.
Johnson, M. P. , & Milardo, R. M. (1984). Network interference in pair relationships: A social psychological recasting of Slater's theory of social regression. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 893-900.
17.
Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving abusive partners. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Klein, R. C. A. , & Johnson, M. P. (1997). Conffict in family relationships. In S. Duck, K. Dindia, B. Ickes, R. Milardo, R. Mills, & B. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd. ed., pp. 469-486). Chichester: Wiley.
19.
Klein, R. C. A. , & Lamm, H. (1996). Legitimate interest in couple conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 619-626.
20.
Klein, R. C. A. , & Milardo, R. M. (1993). Third-party influence on the management of personal relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Social context and relationships (pp. 55-77). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
LaGaipa, J. J. (1982). Rules and rituals in disengagement from relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships. Vol. 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 189-210). London: Academic Press.
22.
Laireiter, A. , Baumann, U., Reisenzein, E., & Untner, A. (1997). A diary method for assessment of interactive networks: The interval-contingent diary SONET-T. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 56, 217-238.
23.
Lakey, B. , & Drew, J. B. (1997). A social-cognitive perspective on social support. In G. Pierce, B. Lakey, I. Sarason, & B. Sarason (Eds.), Sourcebook of social support and personality (pp. 107-140). New York: Plenum Press.
24.
Levinger, G. , & Pietromonaco, P. (1989). A measure of perceived conflict resolution styles in relationships. Unpublished manuscript. University of Massachusetts.
25.
Maguire, M. C. (1999). Treating the dyad as the unit of analysis: A primer on three analytic approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 213-223.
26.
McCall, G. J. (1988). The organizational life cycle of relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 467-484). Chichester: Wiley.
27.
Milardo, R. M. (1989). Theoretical and methodological issues in identifying the social networks of spouses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 165-174.
28.
Milardo, R. M. , & Helms-Erikson, H. (2000). Network overlap and third-party influence in close relationships. In S. S. Hendrick & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 33-45). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Milardo, R. M. , Johnson, M. P., & Huston, T. L. (1983). Developing close relationships: Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 964-976.
30.
Miller, R. L. , & Suls, J. M. (1977). Affiliation preferences as a function of attitude and ability similarity. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 103-124). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
31.
Morgan, D. L. , Neal, M. B., & Carder, P. (1997). The stability of core and peripheral networks over time. Social Networks, 19, 9-25.
32.
O'Connor, P. (1992). Friendships between women. New York: Guilford Press.
33.
Oliker, S. J. (1989). Best friends and marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Parks, M. R. (1997). Communication networks and relationship life-cycles. In S. Duck, K. Dindia, B. Ickes, R. Milardo, R. Mills, & B. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 351-372). Chichester: Wiley.
35.
Procidano, M. E. , & Smith, W. W. (1997). Assessing perceived social support: The importance of context. In G. Pierce, B. Lakey, I. Sarason, & B. Sarason (Eds.), Sourcebook of social support and personality (pp. 93-106). New York: Plenum Press.
36.
Pruitt, D. G. , & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks & Cole.
37.
Rubin, J. Z. , Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Salzinger, L. L. (1982). The ties that bind: The effects of clustering on dyadic relationships. Social Networks, 4, 117-145.
39.
Sheppard, B. H. , Blumenfeld-Jones, K., & Roth, J. (1989). Informal thirdpartyship: Studies of everyday conflict intervention. In K. Kressel, D. G. Pruitt, and associates (Eds.), Mediation research (pp. 166-189). San FrancisCO:Jossey-Bass.
40.
Spanier, G. , & Thompson, L. (1984). Parting: The aftermath of separation and divorce. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Stein, C. H. (1993). Felt obligation in adult family relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Social context and relationships (pp. 78-99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Wellman, B. , Yuk-Lin Wong, R., Tindall, D., & Nazer, N. (1997). A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities. Social Networks, 19, 27-50.
43.
Wellman, B. , & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558-588.
44.
Wright, P. H. (1989). Gender differences in adults: Same-and cross-sex friendships. In R. Adams & R. Blieszner (Eds.), Older adult friendship (pp. 197-221). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Zanna, M. D. , Goethals, G., & Hill, J. (1975). Evaluating a sex-related ability: Social comparison with similar others and standard setters. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 86-93.
