This study used latent change score models to examine how couples make progress toward resolution when they experience conflicts. It examined why negative conflict engagement might sometimes predict increased resolution, and how this process might be moderated by relationship satisfaction. A sample of 734 people in heterosexual marriages or cohabitation relationships were asked to identify an episode of relationship conflict and complete a questionnaire measuring types of negative behavior, attributions, anger, and soft emotion as well as measures of current discord, peak discord, positive behavior, and types of conflict disengagement. Negative engagement predicted peak levels of conflict discord, but for people in satisfying relationships, this effect was benign because large conflicts predicted large resolutions regardless of negative engagement levels.
BaucomD. H.HahlwegK.AtkinsD. C.EnglJ.ThurmaierF. (2006). Long-term prediction of marital quality following a relationship education program: Being positive in a constructive way. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 448–455. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.448
2.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.3
3.
CordovaJ. V.JacobsonN. S.ChristensenA. (1998). Acceptance versus change interventions in behavioral couple therapy: Impact on couples’ in-session communication. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 437–455. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1998.tb01099.x
4.
CramerD. (2003). A cautionary tale of two statistics: Partial correlation and standardized partial regression. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 137, 507–511. doi:10.1080/00223980309600632
5.
EidelsonR. J.EpsteinN. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 715–720. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.50.5.715
6.
EldridgeK. A.SevierM.JonesJ.AtkinsD. C.ChristensenA. (2007). Demand-withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: Rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 218–226. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.218
7.
FeeneyJ. A. (1999). Adult attachment, emotional control, and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 6, 169–185. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00185.x
8.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47–77. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.47
9.
FunkJ. L.RoggeR. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572–583. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
10.
GeiserC. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
GottmanJ. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
GottmanJ. M.KrokoffL. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.47
13.
HeaveyC. L.LayneC.ChristensenA. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16–27. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.16
14.
HeymanR. E. (2001). Observation of couple conflicts: Clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations. Psychological Assessment, 13, 5–35. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.1.5
15.
HoneycuttJ. M.BryanS. P. (2011). Scripts and communication for relationships. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
16.
JohnsonK. L.RoloffM. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25, 327–343. doi:10.1177/009365098025003004
17.
JohnsonS. M.GreenbergL. S. (1988). Relating process to outcome in marital therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14, 175–183. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1988.tb00733.x
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
20.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075–1092. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1075
21.
LavnerJ. A.BradburyT. N. (2012). Why do even satisfied newlyweds eventually go on to divorce?Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 1–10. doi:10.1037/a0025966
22.
MarkmanH. J.StanleyS. M.BlumbergS. L. (2001). Fighting for your marriage: PREP leader manual. Denver, CO: PREP Educational Products.
23.
MarkmanH. J.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.RaganE. P.WhittonS. W. (2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 289–298. doi:10.1037/a0019481
24.
McArdleJ. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analysis. In CudeckR.du ToitS.SorbomD. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 341–380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
25.
McArdleJ. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
26.
McNultyJ. K. (2010). When positive processes hurt relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 167–171. doi:10.1177/0963721410370298
27.
McNultyJ. K.O’MaraE. M.KarneyB. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: ‘don’t sweat the small stuff’… but it is not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 631–646. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.631
28.
McNultyJ. K.RussellV. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 587–604. doi:10.1037/a0017479
29.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.SibleyC. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639. doi:10.1037/a0012961
30.
SanfordK. (2007a). The couples emotion rating form: Psychometric properties and theoretical associations. Psychological Assessment, 19, 411–421. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.411
31.
SanfordK. (2007b). Hard and soft emotion during conflict: Investigating married couples and other relationships. Personal Relationships, 14, 65–90. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00142.x
32.
SanfordK. (2010a). Assessing conflict communication in couples: Comparing the validity of self-report, partner-report, and observer ratings. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 165–174. doi:10.1037/a0017953
33.
SanfordK. (2010b). Perceived threat and perceived neglect: Couples' underlying concerns during conflict. Psychological Assessment, 22, 288–297. doi:10.1037/a0018706
34.
SanfordK. (2012). The communication of emotion during conflict in married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 297–307. doi:10.1037/a0028139
35.
SchillingE. A.BaucomD. H.BurnettC. K.AllenE. S.RaglandL. (2003). Altering the course of marriage: The effect of PREP communication skills acquisition on couples’ risk of becoming maritally distressed. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 41–53. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.17.1.41
36.
WangQ.FinkE. L.CaiD. A. (2012). The effect of conflict goals on avoidance strategies: What does not communicating communicate?Human Communication Research, 38, 222–252. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01421.x
37.
WoodyE. Z.CostanzoP. R. (1990). Does marital agony precede marital ecstasy? A comment on Gottman and Krokoff’s ‘Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view’. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 499–501. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.58.4.499
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
