Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigated the free movement of individuals with visual impairments compared to sighted individuals within an urban city center. Twelve participants with visual impairments and 10 sighted participants completed 4 non-predefined routes, using paths of their choice between fixed start and end points. GPS tracking devices recorded movement every 2 s to map each participant’s route. Participants with visual impairments navigated independently, although they could request assistance when needed. Researchers ensured participant safety by discreetly following them and intervening only in hazardous situations. Movement characteristics such as route length, directional changes, and use of roads and pedestrian streets were analyzed. The data showed that individuals with visual impairments followed significantly longer routes and used pedestrian streets more frequently than sighted participants. This suggests different navigation strategies and highlights the influence of visual impairments on urban mobility. These findings can be valuable for inclusive urban planning that considers the specific mobility patterns and challenges faced by people with visual impairments, helping to create more accessible and safer urban environments.

Keywords

City center free movement routes visual impairments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afonso

Blum

Katz

B. F.

Tarroux

Borst

Denis

(2010). Structural properties of spatial representations in blind people: Scanning images constructed from haptic exploration or from locomotion in a 3-D audio virtual environment. Memory & Cognition, 38(5), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.5.591

Amilon

Larsen

L. B.

Østergaard

S. V.

Rasmussen

A. H.

(2017). Blinde og stærkt svagsynedes levevilkår–Muligheder og barrierer for Samfundsdeltagelse. [Living conditions for blind and severely visually impaired people – Opportunities and barriers to participation in society]. VIVE—Det Nationale Forsknings- og Analysecenter for Velfærd. https://www.vive.dk/media/pure/6837/1046661

Baum

Dibbelt

Pajor

Wagner

(2016). Dynamic time-dependent route planning in road networks with user preferences. In International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (pp. 33–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38851-9_3

Bredmose

Grangaard

Lygum

V. L.

Hansen

A. R.

(2023). Mapping the importance of specific physical elements in urban space for blind and visually impaired people. Journal of Urban Design, 28(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2022.2097862

Burgess

Maguire

E. A.

O’Keefe

(2002). The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron, 35(4), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00830-9

Cao

Zhu

Zhou

Wang

Chen

Zhao

(2021). Risk factors related balance disorder for patients with dizziness/vertigo. BMC Neurology, 21, Article 186. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02188-7

Cereceda Otárola

Sánchez Criado

. (2021). Pedestrian assemblages: Blind people’s walks as techno-sensory practices. AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 16(1), 47–72. http://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.160108e

Chiesa

Schmidt

Tinti

Cornoldi

(2017). Allocentric and contra-aligned spatial representations of a town environment in blind people. Acta Psychologica, 180, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.001

Cushley

Galway

Peto

(2023). The unseen barriers of the built environment: Navigation for people with visual impairment. Town Planning Review, 94(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2022.4

10.

Due

Lange

(2018). Semiotic resources for navigation: A video ethnographic study of blind people’s uses of the white cane and a guide dog for navigating in urban areas. Semiotica, 2018(222), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0196

11.

Gagnon

Schneider

F. C.

Siebner

H. R.

Paulson

O. B.

Kupers

Ptito

(2012). Activation of the hippocampal complex during tactile maze solving in congenitally blind subjects. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1663–1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.0

12.

Gamache

Routhier

Morales

Vandersmissen

M. H.

Boucher

(2019). Mapping review of accessible pedestrian infrastructures for individuals with physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(4), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1449018

13.

Havik

E. M.

Steyvers

F. J.

Kooijman

A. C.

Melis-Dankers

B. J.

(2015). Accessibility of shared space for visually impaired persons: A comparative field study. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 33(2), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619615575793

14.

Heylighen

Van der Linden

Van Steenwinkel

(2017). Ten questions concerning inclusive design of the built environment. Building and Environment, 114, 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.008

15.

Hill

M. R.

(1984). Walking, crossing streets and choosing pedestrian routes: A survey of recent insights from the social/behavioral sciences [PhD thesis], University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/462/

16.

Iachini

Ruggiero

Ruotolo

(2014). Does blindness affect egocentric and allocentric frames of reference in small and large scale spaces? Behavioural Brain Research, 273, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.032

17.

Jeffries

J. M.

Gilroy

Townshend

(2021). Challenging the visual: Learning from the mobility narratives of visually impaired persons. In Townshend

T. G.

(Ed.), Urban Design and Human Flourishing (pp. 74–94). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003158790

18.

Kitchin

R. M.

Jacobson

R. D.

Golledge

R. G.

Blades

(1998). Belfast without sight: Exploring geographies of blindness. Irish Geography, 31(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00750779809478630

19.

Lid

I. M.

Solvang

P. K.

(2016). (Dis)ability and the experience of accessibility in the urban environment. Alter, 10(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2015.11.003

20.

Liebig

Piatkowski

Bockermann

Morik

(2014). Predictive trip planning – Smart routing in smart cities. In EDBT/ICDT Workshops (pp. 331–338). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1133/paper-45.pdf

21.

Marston

J. R.

Bentzen

B. L.

(2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of assistive travel and wayfinding devices for persons who are blind or visually impaired. In Hersh

A. A.

Johnson

M. A.

(Eds.), Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision (pp. 151–178). CRC Press.

22.

Mattsson

Johansson

Almén

Laike

Marcheschi

Ståhl

(2020). Improved usability of pedestrian environments after dark for people with vision impairment: An intervention study. Sustainability, 12(3), 1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031096

23.

McAllister

McBeth

Galway

(2022). Autism spectrum condition and the built environment. Cities & Health, 6(6), 1164–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2022.2139210

24.

Miao

Zeng

Weber

(2017). Externalizing cognitive maps via map reconstruction and verbal description. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16, 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0497-5

25.

Nandini

Seeja

K. R.

(2019). A novel path planning algorithm for visually impaired people. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 31(3), 385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.03.005

26.

Norgate

S. H.

(2012). Accessibility of urban spaces for visually impaired pedestrians. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Municipal Engineer, 165(4), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.12.00019

27.

Ottink

Buimer

van Raalte

Doeller

C. F.

van der Geest

T. M.

van Wezel

R. J.

(2022). Cognitive map formation supported by auditory, haptic, and multimodal information in persons with blindness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 140, 104797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104797

28.

Parkin

Smithies

(2012). Accounting for the needs of blind and visually impaired people in public realm design. Journal of Urban Design, 17(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2012.646139

29.

Pecchini

Giuliani

(2015). Street-crossing behavior of people with disabilities. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 141(10), 04015022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000782

30.

Quiñones

P. A.

Greene

Yang

Newman

(2011). Supporting visually impaired navigation: A needs-finding study. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1645–1650). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979822

31.

Schinazi

V. R.

Thrash

Chebat

D. R.

(2016). Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1375

32.

Stafford

Baldwin

(2018). Planning walkable neighborhoods: Are we overlooking diversity in abilities and ages? Journal of Planning Literature, 33(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217704649

33.

Thomas

(2005). To walk as we listen to the city [Conference session]. Annual Conference: Urban Sustainability – rethinking Senses of Place, Londres.

34.

Valente

Bara

Afonso-Jaco

Baltenneck

Gentaz

. (2021). La perception tactile des propriétés spatiales des objets chez les personnes aveugles. [Tactile perception of spatial properties of objects in blind people]. Enfance, 1(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.3917/enf1.211.0069

35.

van den Brink

Janzen

. (2013). Visual spatial cue use for guiding orientation in two-to-three-year-old children. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00904

36.

Wachaja

Agarwal

Zink

Adame

M. R.

Möller

Burgard

(2017). Navigating blind people with walking impairments using a smart walker. Autonomous Robots, 41, 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-016-9595-8

37.

World Health Organization. (2014). Facts about blindness and visual impairment. https://www.who.int/blindness/en/

Study of the free movement of individuals with visual impairments in a city center: Comparison with the free movement of sighted individuals

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References