Cognitive maps act as symbolic structures that encode spatial knowledge and assist individuals with blindness in making critical decisions while navigating spatial environment. The present study aimed to investigate the information (items) contained in the city center cognitive map of individuals with visual impairments, as well as to the classification of these items based on the sensory modality through which they are recognized, and their perceived usefulness for information, safety, and wayfinding/orientation support. Fourteen individuals with visual impairments were asked to present their cognitive map of the city center, and five of them were further involved in a focus group. The results gave prominence to those items (e.g., bus stations, cafe, pastry shops) the participants find more important to include in their cognitive maps, to the sensory modalities of these items (e.g., auditory and olfactory), as well as to the scope of using the specific items (information and orientation/wayfinding) during their environmental navigation within the city center.
Abd HamidN. N.EdwardsA. D. (2013). Facilitating route learning using interactive audio-tactile maps for blind and visually impaired people. In CHI ‘13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 37–42). https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468364
2.
AbreuD.CodinaB.ToledoJ.SuárezA. (2022). Validation of an eBAT as a mobility aid for blind people. Assistive Technology, 34(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2020.1743380
3.
AfonsoA.BlumA.KatzB. F. G.TarrouxP. (2010). Structural properties of spatial representations in blind people: Scanning images constructed from haptic exploration or from locomotion in a 3-D virtual environment. Memory & Cognition, 38, 591–604. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.5.591
4.
Afonso-JacoA.KatzB. F. (2022). Spatial knowledge via auditory information for blind individuals: Spatial cognition studies and the use of audio-VR. Sensors, 22(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134794
5.
BaninoA.BarryC.UriaB.BlundellC.LillicrapT.MirowskiP.KumaranD. (2018). Vector-based navigation using grid-like representations in artificial agents. Nature, 557(7705), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0102-6
6.
BanovicN.FranzR. L.TruongK. N.MankoffJ.DeyA. K. (2013). Uncovering information needs for independent spatial learning for users who are visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1–8). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513383.2513445
7.
BednyM.SaxeR. (2012). Insights into the origins of knowledge from the cognitive neuroscience of blindness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29(1–2), 56–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2012.713342
8.
BehrensT. E.MullerT. H.WhittingtonJ. C.MarkS.BaramA. B.StachenfeldK. L.Kurth-NelsonZ. (2018). What is a cognitive map? Organizing knowledge for flexible behavior. Neuron, 100(2), 490–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.002
9.
BellmundJ. L.GärdenforsP.MoserE. I.DoellerC. F. (2018). Navigating cognition: Spatial codes for human thinking. Science, 362, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat6766
10.
BrockA.JouffraisC. (2015). Interactive audio-tactile maps for visually impaired people. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 113, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2850440.2850441
11.
CarreirasM.CodinaB. (1992). Spatial cognition of the blind and sighted: Visual and amodal hypotheses. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 12(1), 1–20.
12.
CasasantoD. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: The body specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422058
13.
CaseyS. M. (1978). Cognitive mapping by the blind. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 72, 297–301.
14.
ChangK. Y. J.DillonL. L.DeverellL.BoonM. Y.KeayL. (2020). Orientation and mobility outcome measures. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 103(4), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.13004
15.
ChebatD. R. (2020). Introduction to the special issue on multisensory space – perception, neural representation and navigation. Multisensory Research, 33(4–5), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10004
16.
ChebatD. R.HarrarV.KupersR.MaidenbaumS.AmediA.PtitoM. (2018). Sensory substitution and the neural correlates of navigation in blindness. In PissalouxE.VelazquezR. (Eds.), Mobility of visually impaired people: Fundamentals and ICT assistive technologies (pp. 167–200). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54446-5_6
17.
CornoldiC.VecchiT. (2003). Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203641583
18.
CuturiL. F.Aggius-VellaE.CampusC.ParmiggianiA.GoriM. (2016). From science to technology: Orientation and mobility in blind children and adults. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.019
19.
DarinT.CoelhoB.BorgesB. (2019). Which instrument should I use? Supporting decision-making about the evaluation of user experience. In MarcusA. (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability. Practice and case studies: 8th International Conference, DUXU 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, July 26–31, 2019, Proceedings, Part IV (Vol. 21, pp. 49–67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_4
FaçanhaA. R.DarinT.VianaW.SánchezJ. (2020). O&M indoor virtual environments for people who are blind: A systematic literature review. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 13(2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386513
FoleyR. T.WhitwellR. L.GoodaleM. A. (2015). The two-visual-systems hypothesis and the perspectival features of visual experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.005
24.
GashawM.JanakiramanB.MinyihunA.JemberG.SanyK. (2020). Self-reported fall and associated factors among adult people with visual impairment in Gondar, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 498. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08628-2
25.
GiudiceN. A. (2018). Navigating without vision: Principles of blind spatial cognition. In GolledgeR. R. (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral and cognitive geography (pp. 260–288). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784717544.00024
26.
GolledgeR. G. (Ed.). (1999). Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
HegartyM.HeC.BooneA. P.YuS.JacobsE. G.ChrastilE. R. (2023). Understanding differences in wayfinding strategies. Topics in Cognitive Science, 15(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12668
28.
HershM. A.JohnsonM. A. (2008). Disability and assistive technology systems. In Assistive technology for visually impaired and blind people (pp. 1–50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-867-8_1
29.
JacobsonR. D. (1998). Cognitive mapping without sight: Four preliminary studies of spatial learning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0098
30.
JacobsonR. D.KitchinR. M. (1995). Assessing the configurational knowledge of people with visual impairments or blindness. Swansea Geographer, 32, 14–24.
31.
KitchinR. M.JacobsonR. D. (1997). Techniques to collect and analyze the cognitive map knowledge of persons with visual impairment or blindness: Issues of validity. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91(4), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X9709100405
32.
KoukourikosP.PapadopoulosK. (2015). Development of cognitive maps by individuals with blindness using a multisensory application. Procedia Computer Science, 67, 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.265
33.
KoutsoklenisA.PapadopoulosK. (2011a). Auditory cues used for wayfinding in urban environments by individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(10), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1110501016
34.
KoutsoklenisA.PapadopoulosK. (2011b). Olfactory cues used for wayfinding in urban environments by individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1110501015
35.
KoutsoklenisA.PapadopoulosK. (2014). Haptic cues used for outdoor wayfinding by individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1410800105
36.
KupersR.PtitoM. (2014). Compensatory plasticity and cross-modal reorganization following early visual deprivation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 41, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.001
37.
LahavO.MioduserD. (2008). Construction of cognitive maps of unknown spaces using a multi-sensory virtual environment for people who are blind. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1139–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.003
38.
LingD. K. X. (2018). A finger-mounted obstacle detector for people with visual impairment [Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.25916/sut.26279617.v1
39.
LongR. G.GiudiceN. A. (2010). Establishing and maintaining orientation for mobility. In BlaschB. B.WienerW. R.WelshR. W. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (3rd ed., pp. 45–62). American Foundation for the Blind.
40.
MartoliniC.CappagliG.LupariaA.SignoriniS.GoriM. (2020). The impact of vision loss on allocentric spatial coding. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, Article 565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00565
41.
PapadopoulosK.BaroutiM.KoustriavaE. (2018). Differences in spatial knowledge of individuals with blindness when using audiotactile maps, using tactile maps, and walking. Exceptional Children, 84(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918764300
42.
PapadopoulosK.CharitakisK.KoustriavaE.KouroupetroglouG.StylianidisE.MüllerK.Sakalli GumusS. (2020). Environmental information for inclusion in orientation and mobility maps, identified by travelers with blindness: The cases of city centers and neighborhoods/residential areas. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 38(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619620913895
43.
PapadopoulosK.KoustriavaE.BaroutiM. (2017). Cognitive maps of individuals with blindness for familiar and unfamiliar spaces: Construction through audio-tactile maps and walked experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 376–384. doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.057
44.
ParkerA. T.SwobodzinskiM.WrightJ. D.HansenK.MortonB.SchallerE. (2021). October). Wayfinding tools for people with visual impairments in real-world settings: A literature review of recent studies. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 723816. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.723816
45.
PasqualottoA.ProulxM. J. (2012). The role of visual experience for the neural basis of spatial cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.008
46.
PassiniR.ProulxG. (1988). Wayfinding without vision: An experiment with congenitally totally blind people. Environment and Behavior, 20(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916588202006
47.
QuinonesP. A.GreeneT.YangR.NewmanM. W. (2011, May). Supporting visually impaired navigation: A needs-finding study. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1645–1650). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979822
48.
SalomãoS. R.MitsuhiroM. R.BelfortRJr. (2009). Visual impairment and blindness: An overview of prevalence and causes in Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 81, 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652009000300017
49.
SanabriaL. B. (2007). Mapeo cognitivo y exploración háptica para comprender la disposición del espacio de videntes e invidentes [Cognitive mapping and haptic exploration to understand the layout of the space of sighted and blind people]. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED, 21(21), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num21-359
50.
SantosA. D. P. D.SuzukiA. H. G.MedolaF. O.VaezipourA. (2021). A systematic review of wearable devices for orientation and mobility of adults with visual impairment and blindness. IEEE Access, 9, 162306–162324. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3132887
51.
SchinaziV. R.ThrashT.ChebatD. R. (2016). Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1375
52.
SinghA. K.PhillipsF.MerabetL. B.SinhaP. (2018). Why does the cortex reorganize after sensory loss?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(7), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.004
53.
UngarS. (2000). Cognitive mapping without visual experience. In KitchinR.FreundschuhS. (Eds.), Cognitive mapping: Past, present and future (pp. 221–248). Routledge.
54.
UngarS.BladesM.SpencerC. (1996). The construction of cognitive maps by children with visual impairments. In PortugaliJ. (Ed.), The construction of cognitive maps (pp. 247–273). Kluwer Academic Publishing.
55.
ValenteD.BaraF.Afonso-JacoA.BaltenneckN.GentazÉ. (2021). La perception tactile des propriétés spatiales des objets chez les personnes aveugles [Tactile perception of spatial properties of objects in blind people]. Enfance, 1(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.3917/enf1.211.0069
56.
VasilyevaM.LourencoS. F. (2012). Development of spatial cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1171
57.
VikbladhO. M.MeagerM. R.KingJ.BlackmonK.DevinskyO.ShohamyD.DawN. D. (2019). Hippocampal contributions to model-based planning and spatial memory. Neuron, 102(3), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.014
58.
WangJ. X.Kurth-NelsonZ.KumaranD.TirumalaD.SoyerH.LeiboJ. Z.BotvinickM. (2018). Prefrontal cortex as a meta-reinforcement learning system. Nature Neuroscience, 21(6), 860–868. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0147-8
59.
WilliamsM. A.HurstA.KaneS. K. (2013, October). “Pray before you step out”: Describing personal and situational blind navigation behaviors. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1145/2513383.2513446
60.
ZengL.MiaoM.WeberG. (2015). Interactive audio-haptic map explorer on a tactile display. Interacting with Computers, 27(4), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu023
