The layout of Braille magazines is often overlooked, yet it can significantly affect the reading experience and Braille literacy. This study addresses three key questions: (1) What reading formats do individuals with visual impairments prefer? (2) How important are layout and design for Braille readers? (3) How do readers respond to proposed methods for designing headlines, paragraphs, navigation tools, images, and illustrations in Braille magazines? Interviews with 13 experienced Braille readers revealed a preference for concise, portable magazines and resistance to changes seen as wasting space or resources. Suggestions like raised print headlines, paragraph markers, and tactile illustrations were largely rejected. The findings emphasize the need for user-centered design in Braille magazines, prioritizing clarity, simplicity, and functionality. Key considerations include avoiding unnecessary print elements, improving written descriptions, and using digital formats to enhance navigation. These insights suggest that Braille publications should focus on the preferences and challenges of readers, ensuring design choices support accessibility and engagement without unnecessary complexity.
AdetoroN. (2010). Reading interest and information needs of persons with visual impairment in Nigeria. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 76(1), 49–56.
2.
AdornoT. W. (1997). Aesthetic theory. A&C Black.
3.
AllbanS. D.EmaraI. (2017). Analysis of tactile elements of Braille magazines in Egypt. Journal of Global Communication, 10(1), 10–17.
4.
AppiahD. K. (2017). Information seeking behavior of visually challenged students in public universities: A study of University of Ghana, Legon and University of Education, Winneba. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2017(1), 1–23.
5.
BatterhamP. J. (2014). Recruitment of mental health survey participants using Internet advertising: Content, characteristics and cost effectiveness. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1421
6.
BellE. C.MinoN. M. (2015). Employment outcomes for blind and visually impaired adults. Journal of Blindness Innovation and Research, 5(2), 1–24.
7.
BennettsS. K.HokkeS.CrawfordS.HackworthN. J.LeachL. S.NguyenC.. . .CooklinA. R. (2019). Using paid and free Facebook methods to recruit Australian parents to an online survey: An evaluation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), Article e11206.
8.
BeverleyC. A.BathP. A.BarberR. (2007). Can two established information models explain the information behaviour of visually impaired people seeking health and social care information?Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 9–32.
9.
BeverleyC. A.BathP. A.BarberR. (2011, March). Health and social care information for visually-impaired people. In Aslib proceedings (Vol. 63, No. 2/3, pp. 256–274). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
10.
BhardwajR. K. (2018). Information access mechanism for visually impaired students in higher educational institutions: A study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 38(6), 387–395.
11.
BodaghiN. B.ZainabA. N.ZainabA. N. (2013). My carrel, my second home: Inclusion and the sense of belonging among visually impaired students in an academic library. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 18(1), 39–54.
BrightonC. Z. (2014). Letter to the Editor. Braille Forum, 53(3), 41–42.
14.
BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Sage.
15.
CalvertP.CreaserC.PigottC. (2019). Information access preferences and behavior of blind foundation library clients. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(1), 162–170.
ChoJ. D. (2021). A study of multi-sensory experience and color recognition in visual arts appreciation of people with visual impairment. Electronics, 10(4), 470.
D’AndreaF. M. (2010). Practices and preferences among students who read Braille and use assistive technology (doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).
Del TufoB. (2006). Visual impairment: Its impact upon and implications for aesthetic experience [Doctoral dissertation]. Middlesex University.
22.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
23.
Emara HelmyI. (2022). The publishing of Braille magazines in Egypt: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Magazine Media, 23(1), 41–64.
24.
EmaraI. (2023). Evaluation of qualitative data analysis software by a visually impaired researcher: An autoethnographic study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, Article 16094069231214390. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231214390
25.
EmaraI. (2024). Teaching journalism by a visually impaired instructor: Positive attitudes, assistive technologies, and melting strategies. Media Practice and Education, 25, 309–325.
26.
EmaraI. (2025). “Talking the same language”: The influence of sharing a visual impairment identity between researchers and participants on enhancing participant recruitment and fostering rapport during interviews with blind individuals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069251320858.
GannerJ.Mrva-MontoyaA.ParkM.DuncanK. (2023). Books without barriers: A practical guide to inclusive publishing. IPEd.
29.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A.MarvastiA. B.McKinneyK. D. (Eds.). (2012). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Sage.
30.
GuestG.MacQueenK. M.NameyE. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.
31.
HerndonJ.MartinT.ParisH. (1993). The National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped, Library of Congress, United States of America and the sharing of special-media materials among libraries: Sale, loan, exchange, and gift. Resource Sharing & Information Networks, 8(2), 37–44.
32.
JohnsonL. (1996). The Braille literacy crisis for children. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90(3), 276.
33.
KaiserK. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1632–1641.
34.
Kamei-HannanC. (2009). Innovative solutions for words with emphasis: Alternative methods of Braille transcription. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(10).
35.
KeruboM. (2018). The role of librarians in meeting the information needs of visually and hearing impaired students at the University of Nairobi Library, Kenya [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Nairobi.
36.
KingL.CoetzeeA. (2018). The everyday life information behaviour of visually impaired students at Stellenbosch University. Innovation: Journal of Appropriate Librarianship and Information Work in Southern Africa, 2018(56), 140–162.
37.
LevyJ. (2020). Multi-sensory design for people with visual impairments [Bachelor’s thesis]. University of Arkansas.
38.
LiW.LiY. (2014). A survey of the information needs of visually impaired library users. Journal of Data and Information Science, 7(1), 57–68.
39.
MarshallL.MoysJ. L. (2020). Readers’ experiences of Braille in an evolving technological world. Visible Language, 54(1–2).
40.
MillarS. (1997). Reading by touch. Routledge.
41.
MooreN. (2000). The information needs of visually impaired people. A review of research for the RNIB (pp. 1–63).
42.
NamugenyiA.WameaP. (2021). Effects of information seeking behaviour on accessibility of library services by students with visual impairment in Uganda Christian University, Mukono. International Journal of Current Aspects, 5(2), 1–20.
43.
OliphantJ. (2006). Empowerment and debilitation in the educational experience of the blind in nineteenth-century England and Scotland. History of Education, 35(1), 47–68.
44.
PaepenP.EngelenJ. (2005). Braillekrant and DiGiKrant: A daily newspaper for visually disabled readers. In From author to reader, challenges for the digital content chain: Proceedings of the 9th ICCC international conference on electronic publishing (pp. 197–202). Peeters Publishing. http://elpub.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?188elpub2005
45.
PlimmerB.CrossanA.BrewsterS. A.BlagojevicR. (2008, April). Multimodal collaborative handwriting training for visually-impaired people. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 393–402).
46.
PlimmerB.ReidP.BlagojevicR.CrossanA.BrewsterS. (2011). Signing on the tactile line: A multimodal system for teaching handwriting to blind children. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 18(3), 1–29.
47.
PrattM. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862.
RosenblumL. P.HerzbergT. S. (2015). Braille and tactile graphics: Youths with visual impairments share their experiences. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1510900302
50.
RossiP. H.WrightJ. D.AndersonA. B. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of survey research. Academic Press.
51.
RoulstonK. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. Sage.
52.
RylesR. (1996). The impact of Braille reading skills on employment, income, education, and reading habits. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 219–226.
53.
SalmonsJ. (2014). Qualitative online interviews: Strategies, design, and skills. Sage.
SeyamaL.MorrisC. D.StilwellC. (2014). Information seeking behaviour of blind and visually impaired students: A case study of the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg Campus. Mousaion, 32(1), 1–22.
56.
SheffieldR. M.D’AndreaF. M.MorashV.ChatfieldS. (2022). How many Braille readers? Policy, politics, and perception. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 116(1), 14–25.
57.
SimonC.HuertasJ. A. (1998). How blind readers perceive and gather information written in Braille. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92(5), 322–330.
58.
SinghK. P.MoirangthemE. (2010). Are Indian libraries VIP-friendly? Information use and information seeking behaviour of visually impaired people in Delhi libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2010, 374.
59.
SpunginS. J. (1996). Braille and beyond: Braille literacy in a larger context. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90(3), 271–274.
60.
Stepien-BernabeN. N.LeiD.McKerracherA.Orel-BixlerD. (2019). The impact of presentation mode and technology on reading comprehension among blind and sighted individuals. Optometry and Vision Science, 96(5), 354–361.
61.
SullivanJ. (2014). Pressing on: Amid decline in Braille literacy and shifts in technology, Boston nonprofit remains a top publisher for the blind. Boston Globe.
62.
WiazowskiJ. (2014). Can Braille be revived? A possible impact of high-end Braille and mainstream technology on the revival of tactile literacy medium. Assistive Technology, 26(4), 227–230.
63.
WilliamsonK. (1995). Older adults: Information, communication and telecommunications [doctoral thesis]. Monash University.
64.
WilliamsonK. (1998). Discovered by chance: The role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library and Information Science Research, 20(1), 23–40.
65.
WilliamsonK.SchauderD.BowA. (2000). Information seeking by blind and sight impaired citizens: An ecological study. Information Research, 5(4), 5–4.
66.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). The Marrakesh Treaty: Improving access to books for persons with visual impairments and print disabilities. https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/marrakesh/
67.
ZaidY. A. (2017). Information provision for students with visual impairments in Nigerian universities: Charting a course from project to service delivery. Journal of Applied Information Science and Technology, 10(1), 1–11.
