Orientation and mobility for children with visual impairments during COVID-19: Responses from O&M professionals to a disruption of traditional services

Abstract

After lockdowns and school closings associated with COVID-19 began throughout the United States and Canada in March 2020, this research was completed to explore how the pandemic affected access to orientation and mobility (O&M) services. Using qualititave responses from a mixed methodology study, this article reports the findings from 318 individuals, including both O&M specialists and dually certified teachers of students with visual impairments (TVIs) and O&M specialists. Four major themes emerged through data analysis, including (1) prioritization of O&M goals for students with visual impairments, (2) personal factors affecting access to O&M training, (3) access to O&M services through virtual learning, and (4) creative approaches to O&M instruction during the pandemic. Within these themes, professionals, students, and families alike were asked to assume roles that went beyond traditional expectations. Questions and concerns that professionals in the field need to consider when looking at the future of O&M services were raised as part of this research, including a number of ideas for future studies.

Keywords

Accessibility children COVID-19 orientation and mobility (O&M)virtual learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Behl

D. D.

Blaiser

Cook

Barrett

Callow-Heusser

Brooks

B. M.

Dawson

Quigley

White

K. R.

(2017). A multisite study evaluating the benefits of early intervention via telepractice. Infants & Young Children, 30, 147–161.

Blaiser

Behl

Callow-Heusser

White

(2013). Measuring costs and outcomes of tele-intervention when serving families of children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 5(2), 3–10.

Bowman

E. L.

Liu

(2017). Individuals with severely impaired vision can learn useful orientation and mobility in virtual streets and can use them to improve real street safety. PLOS ONE, 12(4), Article e0176534. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176534

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Capili

T. D.

Watson

J. L.

O’Connor Duffy

(2019). Increased accessibility for people with visual impairments in an online learning environment. OT Practice, American Occupational Therapy Association. https://www.aota.org/-/media/Corporate/Files/Publications/CE-Articles/CE-Article-August-2019.pdf

Dewald

H. B. P.

(2019). Teleintervention as a service delivery model for families of young children with visual impairments in early intervention. Visual Impairment and Deafblind Education Quarterly, 64(4), 32–39.

Dewald

H. B. P.

(2020). Providing orientation and mobility support via in-person and teleintervention home visits for children with visual impairment in early intervention [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Information & Learning. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1597&context=dissertations

Eichorn

J. R.

(1964). The three R’s plus P for children who are blind. The Elementary School Journal, 64(6), 301–303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/999673

Fast

Wild

(2018). Traveling with science. Science and Children, 55(5), 54–59.

10.

Hayton

Dimitriou

(2019). What’s in a word: Distinguishing between habilitation and rehabilitation. Vision Rehabilitation International, 10(1), 1–4.

11.

Kahn

Wild

Woolsey

Haegele

(2014). Let’s get physical. Science and Children, 51(5), 37–43.

12.

Kaiser

J. T.

Cmar

J. L.

Anderson

D. L.

(2019). What’s in a definition? Reflections on the scope of orientation and mobility. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 113(1), 89–92. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/10.1177/0145482X18825183

13.

Kaiser

J. T.

Cmar

J. L.

Rosen

Anderson

(2018). Scope of practice in orientation and mobility. Association for Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired.

14.

Peek

Stough

L. M.

(2010). Children with disabilities in the context of disaster: A social vulnerability perspective. Child Development, 81, 1260–1270.

15.

Rose

(2020). Collaborative consultation through videoconferencing: Appending the service delivery model in Texas. Journal of Visual Impairments & Blindness, 114(3), 212–217.

16.

Rosenblum

L. P.

Herzberg

T. S.

Wild

Botsford

K. D.

Fast

Kaiser

J. T.

Cook

L. K.

Hicks

M. A. C.

DeGrant

J. N.

McBride

C. R.

(2020). Access and engagement: Examining the impact of COVID-19 on students birth-21 with visual impairments, their families, and professionals in the United States and Canada. American Foundation for the Blind.

17.

Wagner

M. O.

Haibach

P. S.

Lieberman

L. J.

(2013). Gross motor skill performance in children with and without visual impairments: Research to practice. International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3246–3252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.030

18.

Welsh

R. L.

(2005). Inventing orientation and mobility techniques and teaching methods. RE:view, 37(2), 61–75. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/10.3200/REVU.37.2.61-75

19.

Wild

Hilson

Farrand

(2013). Conceptual understanding of geological concepts by students with visual impairments. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61, 222–230.