Physical and psychological health,social trust,and financial situation for persons with Usher syndrome type 1

Abstract

The article describes physical health, psychological health, social trust, and financial situation in persons with deafblindness due to Usher syndrome type 1 (USH1) in comparison with a cross-section of the Swedish population. Persons with USH1 were recruited through the Swedish Usher database. Totally, 87 adults received the Health on Equal Terms (HET) questionnaire. The HET was adjusted, thus the questions were translated into Swedish sign language, and a large font size, better contrast, and a structure compatible with the Braille script reader were also provided. The questionnaire comprises a wide range of domains related to health and wellbeing. In all, 60 persons responded (60% women, mean age: 49 years, range: 21–79 years). The persons with USH1 were compared to a cross section of the Swedish population that included 5738 individuals (56% women, mean age: 49 years, range: 16–84 years). Significant differences in physical health, psychological health, social trust, and financial situation as well as the odds ratio adjusted for sex and age, and its 95% confidence interval are reported. The psychological health, social trust, and financial situation of persons with USH1 were significantly poorer compared to the reference group although this was not the case for physical health. Persons with USH1 only expressed significantly more problems with headache compared to the cross section of the Swedish population. The respondents revealed major problems with fatigue, loss of confidence, and suicide thoughts and attempts. Major social trust and financial problems were reported in terms of refraining going out alone, not receiving help, having no one with whom to share thoughts, and confide in and being unable to obtain 15.000 SEK (approximately US$1.724 or €1.544) in the case of an unforeseen situation. To identify factors associated with physical health, psychological health, social trust, and financial situation is important in the design of future rehabilitation strategies for persons with USH1. The high level of psychological distress and lack of social trust reported could be related to ontological insecurity, as well as lack of recognition from others. Special attention must be devoted to suicide behavior.

Keywords

Deafblindness health physical health psychological health social trust Usher syndrome Usher syndrome type 1

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bodsworth

S. M.

Clare

I. C. H.

Simblett

S. K.

(2011). Deafblindness and mental health: Psychological distress and unmet need among adults with dual sensory impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 29, 6–26.

Boström

Nyqvist

(2010). Objective and background of the questions in the national public health survey. Stockholm, Sweden: Statens folkhälsoinstitut.

Brennan

Bally

S. J.

(2007). Psychosocial adaptations to dual sensory loss in middle and late adulthood. Trends in Amplification, 11, 281–300. doi:10.1177/1084713807308210

Damen

G. W. J.

Krabbe

P. F. M.

Kilsby

Mylanus

E. A. M.

(2005). The Usher lifestyle survey: Maintaining independence: A multi-centre study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 28, 309–320.

Danermark

B. D.

Möller

(2008). Deafblindness, ontological security, and social recognition. International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl.), S119–S123. doi:10.1080/14992020802307388

El-Amraoui

Petit

(2014). The retinal phenotype of Usher syndrome: Pathophysiological insights from animal models. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 337, 167–177. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2013.12.004

Ellis

Hodges

(2013). Life and change with Usher: The experiences of diagnosis for people with Usher syndrome. Birmingham, UK: School of Education, University of Birmingham.

Giddens

(1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the Late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Goldberg

D. P.

(1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire: A technique for the identification and assessment of non-psychotic psychiatric illness. London, England: Oxford University Press.

10.

Goldberg

D. P.

Gater

Sartorius

Ustun

Piccinelli

Gureje

Rutter

(1997). The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine, 27, 191–197.

11.

Grover

Fishman

G. A.

Anderson

R. J.

Alexander

K. R.

Derlacki

D. J.

(1997). Rate of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology, 104, 460–465.

12.

Hersh

(2013). Deafblind people, communication, independence, and isolation. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18, 446–463. doi:10.1093/deafed/ent022

13.

Jones

(2002). Deafness as culture: A psychosocial perspective. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(2), 51–60.

14.

Jylhä

(2009). What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 307–316. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013

15.

Kimberling

W. J.

Möller

(1995). Clinical and molecular genetics of Usher syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 6, 63–72.

16.

Mathur

Yang

(2015). Usher syndrome: Hearing loss, retinal degeneration and associated abnormalities. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA): Molecular Basis of Disease, 1852, 406–420. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.11.020

17.

Miilunpalo

Vuori

Oja

Pasanen

Urponen

(1997). Self-rated health status as a health measure: The predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 517–528.

18.

Miner

I. D.

(1995). Psychosocial implications of Usher syndrome, Type-I, throughout the life-cycle. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 287–296.

19.

Miner

I. D.

(1997). People with Usher syndrome Type II: Issues and adaptations. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91, 579–589.

20.

Möller

(2003). Deafblindness: Living with sensory deprivation. The Lancet, 362(Suppl.), s46–s47. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15074-X

21.

Möller

(2003). Deafblindness: A challenge for assessment – Is the ICF a useful tool? International Journal of Audiology, 42(Suppl.), S140–S142.

22.

Möller

Danermark

(2007). Social recognition, participation, and the dynamic between the environment and personal factors of students with deafblindness. American Annals of the Deaf, 152(1), 42–55.

23.

Moore

Wright

Moore

Ogden

Rogers

(2013). Overcoming the challenges of translating mental health instruments into sign languages. International Journal on Mental Health and Deafness, 3, 20–29.

24.

Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues. (2014). Definition of deafblindness. Retrieved from http://www.nordicwelfare.org/PageFiles/992/Nordic%20Definition%20of%20Deafblindness.pdf

25.

Public Health Agency of Sweden. (2007). Health on equal terms? A survey of living conditions in Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/documents/statistik-uppfoljning/enkater-undersokningar/nationella-folkhalsoenkaten/frageformular/questionnaire-survey-public-health-2007.pdf

26.

Sadeghi

Cohn

E. S.

Kimberling

W. J.

Tranebjaerg

Möller

(2005). Audiological and vestibular features in affected subjects with USH3: A genotype/phenotype correlation. International Journal of Audiology, 44, 307–316.

27.

Schneider

(2006). Becoming deaf-blind: Negotiating a place in a hostile world. Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=21869941&site=ehost-live

28.

Statens Folkhälsoinstitut & Boström

(2008). Hälsa på lika villkor? Hälsa och livsvillkor bland personer med funktionsnedsättning [Health on equal terms? Health and living conditions among people with impairments]. Stockholm, Sweden: Statens folkhälsoinstitut. Retrieved from http://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/pagefiles/21539/R200817_Halsa_pa_lika_villkor0807.pdf

29.

Statistiska Centralbyrån [Statistic Sweden]. (2007). “Hälsa på lika villkor.” Enkätundersökning 2007. Det nationella urvalet [“Health on equal terms.” Survey 2007. The selection of the Swedish population]. Stockholm, Sweden: Author.

30.

Stephens

(2001) Audiometric investigation of first- degree relatives. In Martini

Mazzoli

Stephens D.

Read (Eds.), Definitions, protocols and guidelines in genetic hearing impairment. London: Whurr Publishers.

31.

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml#top

32.

Wahlqvist

Möller

Danermark

(2013). Physical and psychological health in persons with deafblindness that is due to Usher syndrome Type II. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 107, 207–220.