The use of guide dogs by people with visual impairment is relatively new in many Asian societies. The case study research explores the mobility experience of a guide dog team (a person with visual impairment and a guide dog) in Singapore. Emergent themes of adaptation, knowledge, symbiosis, advocacy, and agency, with overarching themes of functional-instrumental and symbolic-expressive were identified. The study identified themes and issues surrounding the use of guide dogs in the Singapore context.
AsmussenK. J.CreswellJ. W. (1995). Campus response to a student gunman. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 575–591.
2.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
3.
CampM. M. (2000). The use of service dogs as an adaptive strategy: A qualitative study. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 509–517.
4.
Clark-CarterD. D.HeyesA. D.HowarthC. I. (1986). The efficiency and walking speed of visually impaired people. Ergonomics, 29, 779–789.
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
FallaniG.PrevideE. P.ValsecchiP. (2005). Do disrupted early attachments affect the relationship between guide dogs and blind owners?Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100, 241–257.
7.
FuhrP. S.LiuL.KyukT. K. (2006). Relationships between search and mobility performance in persons with severe visual impairment. Optometry and Vision Science, 84, 393–400.
8.
GitlinL. N.MountJ.LucasW.WeirichL. C.GrambergL. (1997). The physical costs and psychosocial benefits of travel aids for persons who are visually impaired or blind. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 91, 347–359.
9.
HockenS. (2011). Emma and I. The beautiful Labrador who saved my life. London, England: Ebury Press.
10.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. London, England: Routledge.
11.
KohT. (2012, January15). Opening eyes for guide dogs for the blind. The Straits Times, p. 37.
12.
LaneD. R.McNicholasJ.CollisG. M. (1998). Dogs for the disabled: Benefits to recipients and welfare of the dog. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 59, 1–3.
13.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
14.
MatsunakaK.KodaN. (2008). Acceptance of guide dogs and daily stress levels of guide dog users and nonusers. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 102, 295–304.
15.
MertensD. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd Edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
MinerR. J. (2001). The experience of living with and using a dog guide. RE:view, 32, 183–190.
18.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
NicholsonJ. (1993). The end of a partnership: The reactions of guide dog owners to the end of a working partnership with their guide dog. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 1, 29–30.
20.
NicholsonJ.Kemp-WheelerS.GriffithsD. (1995). Distress arising from the end of a guide dog partnership. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 8, 100–110.
21.
OstermeierM. (2010). History of guide dog use by veterans. Military Medicine, 175, 587–593.
22.
PeelB. W. (1975). The training of guide dogs for the blind. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 23, 269–272.
23.
QuekC. (2010, September6). Still difficult getting around with his guide dog. The Straits Times, pp. B4–B5.
24.
RefsonK.JacksonA. J.DusoirA. E.ArcherD. B. (1999). The health and social status of guide dog owners and other visually impaired adults in Scotland. Visual Impairment Research, 1, 95–109.
25.
Reid-CunninghamA. R. (2009). Anthropological theories of disability. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19, 99–111.
26.
Sachs-EricssonN.HansenN. K.FitzgeraldS. (2002). Benefits of assistance dogs: A review. Rehabilitation Psychology, 47, 251–277.
27.
ScotchR. K. (1988). Disability as the basis for social movement: Advocacy and politics of definition. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 159–172.
28.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
SteffansM. C.BerglerR. (1998). Blind people and their dogs: An empirical study on changes in everyday life, in self-experience and in community participation. In WilsonC. C.TurnerD. C. (Eds.), Companions animals in human health (pp. 149–157). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
StevensonA. (2013). Dog team walking: Inter-corporal identities, blindness and reciprocal guiding. Disability and Society, 28, 1162–1167.
31.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
32.
SwenorB. K.MunozB.WestS. K. (2014). A longitudinal study of the association between visual impairment and mobility performance in older adults: The Salisbury eye evaluation study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 179, 313–322.
33.
ValentineD.KiddooM.LaFleurB. (1993). Psychosocial implications of service dog ownership for people who have mobility or hearing impairments. Social Work in Health Care, 19, 109–125.
34.
WhitmarshL. (2005). The benefits of guide dog ownership. Visual Impairment Research, 7, 27–42.
35.
Wiggett-BarnardC.SteelH. (2008). The experience of owning a guide dog. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 1014–1026.
36.
WinkleM.CroweT. K.HendrixI. (2011). Service dogs and people with physical disabilities partnerships: A systematic review. Occupational Therapy International, 19, 54–66.
37.
ZijlstraG. A. R.BallemansJ.KempenG. I. J. M. (2013). Orientation and mobility for adults with low vision: A new standardized approach. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27, 3–18.
