Rapport-based supervision in probation is linked to positive behavioural change and reduced reoffending for probation service users. However, the process of rapport building is not well documented in probation practice. This study conducted focus groups and interviews with London-based probation practitioners to understand their views of rapport when supervising service users. Thematic analysis generated five themes related to how practitioners facilitated rapport building and maintenance, as well as several barriers that exist towards building and maintaining rapport – these were conceptualised as a rapport-building process. We provide recommendations to help alleviate barriers and further facilitate the rapport-building process.
AlexanderMVan BenschotenSWaltersS (2008) Motivational interviewing training in criminal justice: development of a model plan. Federal Probation72(2): 61–66.
2.
ArditoRBRabellinoD (2011) Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Frontiers in Psychology2(270): 1–11.
3.
BlaskoBLFriedmannPDRhodesAG, et al. (2015) The parolee–parole officer relationship as a mediator of criminal justice outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior42(7): 722–740.
4.
BordinES (1979) The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy Theory Research & Practice16(3): 252–260.
5.
BottomsAShaplandJ (2011) Steps towards desistance among male young adult recidivists. In: FarrallSHoughMMarunaSSparksR (eds) Escape routes: contemporary perspectives on life after punishment. London: Routledge, pp.43–80.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
7.
ChamberlainAWGriciusMWallaceDM, et al. (2018) Parolee–parole officer rapport: does it impact recidivism?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology62(11): 3581–3602.
8.
ClarkMDWaltersSGingerichR, et al. (2006) Motivational interviewing for probation officers: tipping the balance toward change. Federal Probation70(1): 38–45.
9.
CollinsKCarthyN (2019) No rapport, no comment: the relationship between rapport and communication during investigative interviews with suspects. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling16(1): 18–31.
10.
DomineyJ (2019) Probation supervision as a network of relationships: aiming to be thick, not thin. Probation Journal66(3): 283–302.
11.
FarrallS (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. London: Willan Publishing.
12.
GreenwaldAGBanajiMR (1995) Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review102(1): 4–27.
13.
HolmbergUChristiansonSÅ (2002) Murderers’ and sexual Offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law20(1–2): 31–45.
IrelandCBergB (2008) Women in parole: respect and rapport. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology52(4): 474–491.
16.
KitzingerJ (1995) Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. The BMJ311(7000): 299–302.
17.
LeibrichJ (1993) Straight to the point: angles on giving up crime. New-Zealand: Otago University Press.
18.
LewisKRLewisLSGarbyTM (2013) Surviving the trenches: the personal impact of the job on probation officers. American Journal of Criminal Justice38(1): 67–84.
19.
LustigDCStrauserDRDewaine RiceN, et al. (2002) The relationship between working alliance and rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin46(1): 24–32.
20.
MackenzieJMCartwrightTBeckA, et al. (2015) Probation staff experiences of managing suicidal and self-harming service users. Probation Journal62(2): 111–127.
21.
MartinDJGarskeJPDavisMK (2000) Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology68(3): 438–450.
22.
McMurranM (2009) Motivational interviewing with offenders: a systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology14(1): 83–100.
23.
McNeillF (2009) What works and what’s just?European Journal of Probation1(1): 21–40.
24.
MillerWRRollnickS (1991) Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
MoyersTBMartinTHouckJM, et al. (2009) From in-session behaviors to drinking outcomes: a causal chain for motivational interviewing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology77(6): 1113–1124.
27.
NewberryJJStubbsCA (1990) Advanced interviewing techniques. Georgia: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms National Academy.
28.
RaynorPUgwudikePVanstoneM (2014) The impact of skills in probation work: a reconviction study. Criminology and Criminal Justice14(2): 235–249.
29.
RobinsonZC (2014) Changing Probation Practice: Frontline Perspectives on a New Model for Supervising Offenders. PhD Thesis, University of Portsmouth, UK.
30.
ShaplandJBottomsAFarrallS, et al. (2012) The quality of probation supervision – a literature review. Report, Ministry of Justice, UK, March.
31.
SkeemJLLoudenJEPolaschekD, et al. (2007) Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: blending care with control. Psychological Assessment19(4): 397–410.
32.
SorsbyAShaplandJFarrallS, et al. (2013) Probation staff views of the Skills for Effective Engagement Development (SEED) project. Report, National Offender Management Service, UK, July.
33.
SturmAMengerADe VogelV, et al. (2020) Predictors of change of working alliance over the course of probation supervision: a prospective cohort study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology64(8): 753–773.
34.
Tickle-DegnenLRosenthalR (1990) The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry1(4): 285–293.
35.
TrotterC (2014) Working with involuntary clients: A guide to practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
36.
VallanoJPCompoNS (2015) Rapport-Building with cooperative witnesses and criminal suspects: a theoretical and empirical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law21(3): 85–99.
37.
VidalSOudekerkBAReppucciND, et al. (2013) Examining the link between perceptions of relationship quality with parole officers and recidivism among female youth parolees. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice13(1): 60–76.
