Drawing on interviews with halfway house staff, this article provides insight into how these workers conceive of their work and occupational identities within the specific context of the halfway house. Specifically, I examine how halfway house workers seek to differentiate their work and approach to governing former prisoners from that of parole officers. I demonstrate how halfway house workers in this study capitalized on their intermediary position as quasi-state agents, using meso-level complications and struggle to carve out a space in which they felt empowered to carry out multiple, and sometimes conflicting, agendas in their everyday work with halfway house residents.
BakerKM (2013) Decision making in a hybrid organization: a case study of a southwestern drug court treatment program. Law & Social Inquiry38(1): 27–54.
2.
BaresKJMowenTJ (2020) Examining the parole officer as a mechanism of social support during re-entry from prison. Crime & Delinquency66(6-7): 1023–1051. DOI: 10.1177/0011128719881599
3.
BeckettKMurakawaN (2012) Mapping the shadow carceral state: toward an institutionally capacious approach to punishment. Theoretical Criminology16(2): 221–244.
4.
BellATrevethanS (2004) Community Residential Facilities in Canada: A Descriptive Profile of Residents and Facilities(NR-157). Research Branch Correctional Service of Canada. Available at: https://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/research/r157-eng.shtml (accessed 30 September 2020).
5.
CarrN (2018) Space, place and supervision. Probation Journal65(2): 131–134.
6.
ChamberlainAWGriciusMWallaceDM, et al. (2018) Parolee–parole officer rapport: does it impact recidivism?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology62(11): 3581–3602.
7.
CherrySChestonL (2006) Towards a model regime for approved premises. Probation Journal53(3): 248–264.
DoobAWebsterCMansonA (2014) Zombie parole: the withering of conditional release in Canada. Criminal Law Quarterly61(3): 301–328.
10.
GiordanoPCCernkovichSARudolphJL (2002) Gender, Crime, and Desistance: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Transformation. American Journal of Sociology107(4): 990–1064.
11.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co.
12.
GottschalkM (2011) The past, present, and future of mass incarceration in the United States. Criminology & Public Policy10(3): 483–504.
13.
GowanTWhethstoneS (2014) Making the criminal addict: subjectivity and social control in a strong-arm rehab. Punishment & Society14(1): 69–93.
14.
HalushkaJ (2016) Work wisdom: teaching former prisoners how to negotiate workplace interactions and perform a rehabilitated self. Ethnography17(1): 72–91.
15.
Hannah-MoffatKMauruttoP (2012) Shifting and targeted forms of penal governance: bail, punishment and specialized courts. Theoretical Criminology16(2): 201–219.
16.
Irwin-RogersK (2017) Staff-resident relationships in approved premises: what a difference a door makes. Probation Journal64(4): 388–404.
17.
KaufmanN (2015) Prisoner incorporation: the work of state and non-governmental organizations. Theoretical Criminology19(4): 534–553.
18.
KaufmanN (2018) Nongovernmental organizations and postprison life: examining the role of religion. Punishment & Society21(4): 393–416.
19.
KaufmanNKaiserJRumpfC (2018) Beyond punishment: the penal state’s interventionist, covert and negligent modalities of control. Law & Social Inquiry43(2): 468–495.
20.
LamontM (2000) The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
MaierK (2020a) ‘Mobilizing’ prisoner re-entry research: Halfway houses and the spatial-temporal dynamics of prison release. Theoretical Criminology. Epub ahead of Print 11 January 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1362480619896371
22.
MaierK (2020b) Canada’s ‘Open Prisons’: Hybridisation and the Role of Halfway Houses in Penal Scholarship and Practice. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice. Epub ahead of Print 5 May 2020. DOI: 10.1111/hojo.12365
23.
McKimA (2014) Roxanne’s dress: governing gender and marginality through addiction treatment. Journal of Women in Culture and Society39(21): 433–458.
24.
McKimA (2017) Addicted to Rehab: Race, Gender, and Drugs in the Era of Mass Incarceration. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
25.
MijsJ (2016) The missing organizational dimension of prisoner re-entry: an ethnography of the road to re-entry at a nonprofit service provider. Sociological Forum31(2): 291–309.
26.
MillerR (2014) Devolving the carceral state: race, prisoner re-entry, and the micro-politics of urban poverty management. Punishment & Society16(3): 305–335.
27.
MooreD (2011) The benevolent watch: therapeutic surveillance in drug treatment court. Theoretical Criminology15(3): 255–268.
28.
MorahMKashyDASmithSW, et al. (2018) Is the nature of communication relevant to the supportiveness of women’s relationships with probation and parole agents?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology62(2): 1629–1647.
29.
QuirouetteMHannah-MoffatKMauruttoP (2016) ‘A precarious place’: housing and clients of specialized courts. British Journal of Criminology56(2): 370–388.
30.
SinghR (2011) When punishment and philanthropy mix: voluntary organizations and the governance of the domestic offender. Theoretical Criminology16(3): 269–287.
31.
TrudeauD (2008) Junior partner or empowered community? The role of non-profit social service providers amidst state restructuring in the US. Urban Studies45(3): 2805–2827.
32.
TurnbullSHannah-MoffatK (2009) Under these conditions: gender, parole, and the governance of reintegration. British Journal of Criminology49: 1–20.
33.
VisherCTravisJ (2003) Transitions from prison to community: understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology29: 89–113.
34.
WerthR (2012) I do what I’m told to, sort of: reformed subjects, unruly citizens, and parole. Theoretical Criminology16(3): 329–346.
35.
WerthR (2013) The construction and stewardship of responsible yet precarious subjects: punitive ideology, rehabilitation, and ‘tough’ love among parole personnel. Punishment & Society15(3): 219–246.
36.
WorrallAMawbyRC (2014) Probation worker cultures and relationships with offenders. Probation Journal61(4): 346–357.
