Drawing on recent research conducted in Scottish criminal courts, this article discusses the evidencing of sexual crimes through victim testimony. Despite significant reforms, complainers in sexual offence trials still find the process traumatic; the amount of sexual evidence introduced into the trial has increased; and the nature of such evidence draws on pervasive and outmoded rape myths.
Adler, Z. ( 1987) Rape on Trial. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2.
Association of Chief Police Officers Scotland (ACPOS) ( 2008) Scottish Investigators’ Guide to Serious Sexual Offences. Glasgow: ACPOS .
3.
Baird, V. ( 1999) ‘Changes to Section 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 1976’, Medicine, Science and the Law39(3): 198-208.
4.
BBC (2009a) Judge locked up rape case witness, BBC News Online, 7 February 2009. URL (accessed 10 March 2009): http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/7876649.stm
5.
BBC (2009b) Rape witness in cell ordeal anger, BBC News Online, 23 February 2009. URL (accessed 10 March 2009): http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/7906389.
6.
Birch, D. ( 2002) Rethinking sexual history evidence: proposals for fairer trialsCriminal Law Review, 531.
7.
Brown, B., M. Burman and L. Jamieson ( 1992) Sexual History and Sexual Character Evidence in Scottish Sexual Offence Trials. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit.
8.
Brown, B., M. Burman, and L. Jamieson ( 1993) Sex Crimes on Trial: Sexual Evidence in the Scottish Courts . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
9.
Burman, M., L. Jamieson, J. Nicholson with F. Cartmel ( 2005) The Law of Evidence in Sexual Offence Trials: Base Line Study, Crime and Criminal Justice Research Series. Edinburgh : Scottish Executive.
10.
Burman, M., L. Jamieson, J. Nicholson and O. Brooks ( 2007) Impact of Aspects of the Law of Evidence in Sexual Offence Trials: An Evaluation Study. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
11.
Campbell, R. and S. Raja ( 1999) ‘The Secondary Victimization of Rape Victims: Insights from Mental Health Professionals who Treat Survivors of Violence’ , Violence and Victims14: 261-75.
12.
Chambers, G. and A. Millar ( 1986) Prosecuting Sexual Assault. Edinburgh : Scottish Office Central Research Unit .
13.
Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) ( 2006) Review of the Investigation and Prosecution of Sexual Offences. Edinburgh: COPFS .
14.
Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) ( 2008) Lord Advocate’s Guidelines - Investigation and Reporting of Sexual Offences. Edinburgh: COPFS. URL (accessed 20 March 2009): http://www.copfs.gov.uk/Publications/2008/11/LAGuidelinesSexOffences
15.
Ellison, L. and V.E. Munro ( 2009) ‘Reacting to Rape: Exploring Mock Jurors’ Assessments of Complainant Credibility’, British Journal of Criminology49: 202-19.
16.
Field, D. ( 1988) The Law of Evidence. Edinburgh : W Green & Son.
17.
Frazier, P.A. and B. Haney ( 1996) ‘Sexual Assault Cases in the Legal System: Police, Prosecutor and Victim Perspectives’, Law and Human Behavior20: 607-28.
18.
Gordon, T. ( 2009) ‘Rape Case Judge Criticised for Previous Role in Jailing Witnesses’, The Sunday Herald, 1 March 2009
19.
Hamilton, T. ( 2009) ‘Fury as Sheriff has Traumatised Alleged Rape Victim Locked in Cells Overnight’, The Daily Record , 7 February 2009.
20.
Harris, J. and S. Grace ( 1999) A Question of Evidence: Prosecuting Rape in the 1990s, Home Office Research Study 196. London: Home Office.
21.
HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) (2002) A Report on the Joint Inspection into the Investigation and Prosecution of Cases involving Allegations of Rape. London: HMCPSI and HMIC.
22.
HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) (2007) Without Consent: A Report on the Joint Review of the Investigation and Prosecution of Rape Offences. London: HMCPSI and HMIC .
23.
ICM (2005) Sexual Assault Research Summary Report for Amnesty International. URL (accessed 19 March 2009): http://amnesty.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_16619.doc
24.
Jamieson, L. and M. Burman ( 2001) Sharpening the Focus on Relevance? SCOLAG, Legal Journal Issue287, September 2001.
25.
Justice 2 Committee (2001a) Stage 1 Report on the Sexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Bill. URL (accessed 9 March 2009): http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/historic/justice2/reports-01/j2r01-13-01.htm
26.
Justice 2 Committee (2001b) Stage 2 Report on the Sexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Bill.
27.
Kalven, H. and H. Zeisel ( 1996) The American Jury. Boston: Little, Brown.
28.
Kebbell, M.R., S. Deperez and G.F. Wagstaff ( 2003) ‘The Examination and Cross-examination of Alleged Rape-victims and Defendants in Court’, Psychology Crime and Law9: 49-59.
29.
Kelly, L. ( 2002) A Research Review on the Reporting, Investigation and Prosecution of Rape Cases. London: HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary .
30.
Kelly, L. and L. Regan ( 2001) Rape: The Forgotten Issue?London: Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, University of North London
31.
Kelly, L., J. Temkin and S. Griffiths ( 2006) Section 41: An Evaluation of New Legislation Limiting Sexual History Evidence in Rape Trials, Home Office Online Report 20/06. London: Home Office.
32.
Kennedy, H. ( 1992) Eve was Framed. London: Chatto & Windus.
33.
Kibble, N. ( 2001) ‘The Relevance and Admissibility of Prior Sexual History with the Defendant in Sexual Offence Cases’, Cambrian Law Review32: 27-63.
34.
Kibble, N. ( 2005) ‘Judicial Discretion, and the Admissibility of Prior Sexual History under Section 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999: Sometimes Sticking to your Guns means Shooting yourself in the Foot’ , Criminal Law Review April2005: 263-74.
35.
Konradi, A. ( 1996) ‘Preparing to Testify: Rape Survivors Negotiating the Criminal Justice Process’, Gender and Society10: 404-32.
36.
Lea, S.J., U. Lanvers and S. Shaw ( 2003) ‘Attrition in Rape Cases: Developing a Profile and Identifying Relevant Factors’, British Journal of Criminology43: 583-99.
37.
Lees, S. ( 1996) Carnal Knowledge: Rape on Trial. London : Hamish Hamilton.
38.
Lees, S. and J. Gregory ( 1996) ‘Attrition in Rape and Sexual Assault Cases’ , British Journal of Criminology36(1): 1-17.
39.
McColgan, A. ( 1996) ‘Common Law and the Relevance of Sexual History Evidence’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies16: 275-30.
40.
Raitt, F. ( 2001) ‘Balancing Rights of Complainer and Accused’ , The Law Society of Scotland Journal OnLine. URL (accessed 18 June 2008): http://www.journalonline.co.uk/article/1000776.aspx
41.
Regan, L. and L. Kelly ( 2003) Rape: Still a Forgotten Issue. Briefing Document
42.
for Strengthening the Linkages - Consolidating the European Network Project?London: Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, University of North London.
43.
Rook, P. ( 2004) ‘Restrictions on Evidence or Questions about the Complainant’s Sexual History’, The Barrister22 (July). URL (accessed 11 March 2009): http://www.baristermagazine.com/articles/issue22/rook.htm
44.
Scottish Executive (2000) Redressing the Balance: Cross-Examination in Rape and Sexual Offence Trials. URL (accessed 12 March 2009): http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations/justice/rtb-00.asp
45.
Scottish Executive (2001a) Redressing the Balance: Cross-Examination in Rape and Sexual Offence Trials, Report on Responses to Consultation. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. URL (accessed 12 March 2009): http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library3/justice/rtb-00.asp
46.
Scottish Executive (2001b) Sexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Bill Policy Memorandum. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.
47.
Scottish Executive (2001c) Preventing Violence Against Women: Action across the Scottish Executive. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. URL (accessed 12 March 2009): http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2001/10/10130/File-1
48.
Scottish Government (2008) Information Pack for Women and Men (Over 16) who have been Raped or Sexually Assaulted . Edinburgh: Scottish Government . URL (accessed 3 March 2009): http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/04/16112631/0
49.
Smith, L.J.F. ( 1989) Concerns About Rape, Home Office Research Study No. 106. London: HMSO .
50.
Sweeney, C. ( 2009) ‘Enquiry into jailing of rape victim’ , The Times, 24 February 2009.
51.
Temkin, J. ( 1993) ‘Sexual History Evidence: The Ravishment of Section 2’, Criminal Law Review January: 3-20.
52.
Temkin, J. ( 2000) ‘Prosecuting and Defending Rape: Perspectives from the Bar’Journal of Law and Society27(2): 219-48.
53.
Temkin, J. ( 2002) Rape and the Legal Process, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
TNS System Three (2007) Findings from the Wave 10 Post-campaign Evaluation of the Domestic Abuse Campaign 2006/07 . Edinburgh: Scottish Government. URL (accessed 4 March 2009): http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2007/08/01142941/0
55.
Westmarland, N. ( 2004) Rape Law Reform in England and Wales, School for Policy Studies Working Paper. Bristol: University of Bristol.
