There is ample evidence that young people are using social media in grooming and bullying to abuse and exploit others sexually with enough frequency to make those behaviours important concerns for both society and care providers. This article provides a critical overview of the conceptual and theoretical foundations for ‘grooming’ among peers and use of social media within harmful sexual behaviour. It introduces a model for intervention based on the literature on memory bundles, thinking and problem solving and highlights how the suggested model may be applied in practice.
AllenMEmmersTGenhardtLGieryMA (2006) Exposure to pornography and acceptance of rape myths. Journal of Communication45(1): 5–26.
2.
AshurstL (2011) Emotional intelligence and the practitioner working with sexually harmful behavior. In: CalderMC (ed.) Contemporary Practice With Young People Who Sexually Abuse: Evidence-based Developments. Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.
3.
AshurstE (2012) Developing and testing a general training model for improving professional practice of case managers: Using practitioners working with young people displaying sexually harmful behaviour for an exemplar. Unpublished PhD thesis, Queen’s University Belfast.
CarrollJSPadilla-WalkerLMNelsonLJOlsonCDBarryCMMadsenSD (2008) Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research23(1): 6–30.
ChooKKR (2009) Online Child Grooming: A Literature Review on the Misuse of Social Networking Sites for Grooming Children for Sexual Offences, AIC Reports Research and Public Policy Series 103. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
8.
EdwardsAL (1957) The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. University of Michigan, New York: Dryden Press.
9.
EpsteinMWardLM (2008) ‘Always use protection’: Communication boys receive about sex from parents, peers, and the media. Journal of Youth and Adolescence37(2): 113–126.
10.
FernandezYM (2006) Focusing on the positive and avoiding negativity in sexual offender treatment. In: MarshallWLFernandezYMMarshallLESerranGA (eds.) Sexual Offender Treatment: Controversial Issues. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
11.
FinkelhorDMitchellKJWolakJ (2000) Online Vicimization: A Report on the Nation’s Youth. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Available at <http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC62.pdf> (accessed 29 March 2011).
12.
FloodFHamiltonC (2003) Regulating Youth Access to Pornography. Discussion Paper Number 53. Canberra: The Australia Institute.
13.
FloodM (2007) Exposure to pornography among youth in Australia. Journal of Sociology43(1): 45–60.
14.
GallagherB (2000) The extent and nature of known cases of institutional child sexual abuse. British Journal of Social Work30(6): 795–817.
15.
GillespieA (2013) Adolescents, sexting and human rights. Human Rights Law Review13(4): 623–643.
HorvathMAHAlysLMasseyKPinaAAdlerJ.R. (2013) ‘Basically … Porn is Everywhere’ – A Rapid Evidence Assessment on the Effects that Access and Exposure to Pornography has on Children and Young People. London: Office for the Children’s Commissioner.
18.
JohnsonJHonnoldJStevensFP (2010) Using social network analysis to enhance nonprofit organizational research capacity: A case study. Journal of Community Practice18(4): 493–512.
19.
KahnemanD (2011) Thinking, Fast And Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
20.
KandelER (2006) In Search of Memory. The Emergence of a New Science of Mind. New York: WW Norton & Company.
21.
KaufmanKLHillikerDRDaleidenEL (1996) Sub group differences in the modus operandi of adolescent sexual offenders. Child Maltreatment1(1): 17–24.
22.
KaufmanKLHolmbergJKOrtsKAMcCradyFERotzienALDaleidenELHillikerDR (1998) Factors influencing sexual offenders’ modus operandi: An Examination of victim–offender relatedness and age. Child Maltreatment3(4): 349–361.
23.
LeclercBBeauregardEProulxJ (2008) Modus operandi and situational aspects in adolescent sexual offenses against children: A further examination. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology52(1): 46–61.
24.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2007) Taking risks when communicating on the internet: The role of offline social-psychological factors in young people’s vulnerability to online risks. Information, Communication and Society10(5): 619–643.
25.
McAlindenA (2012) ‘Grooming’ and The Sexual Abuse Of Children: Institutional, Internet And Familial Dimensions. Clarendon Studies of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
McCroryEWalker-RhymesP (2011) A Treatment Manual for Adolescents Displaying Sexually Harmful Behaviour: Change for Good. NSPCC/Jessica Kingsley.
27.
MalamuthN (2001) Pornography. In SchudsonM (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences17:11816–11821. New York: Elsevier Science.
28.
Ministry of Justice (2013) An Overview of Sexual Offending in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice, Home Office and Office for National Statistics.
29.
Montgomery-DevlinJ (2008) The sexual exploitation of children and young people in Northern Ireland: Overview from the Barnardo’s Beyond the Shadows Service. Child Care in Practice14(4): 381–400.
30.
NCH (1992) The Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Children and Young People Who Sexually Abuse Other Children. London: NCH.
31.
OstSMooneyJ-L (2013) Group localised grooming: What is it and what challenges does it pose for society and law?Child and Family Law Quarterly25(4): 425–450.
32.
PaulP (2005) Pornified: How Pornography is Transforming Our Lives, Our Relationships, and Our Families. New York: Henry Holy & Company.
33.
PhippenA (2012) Sexting: An Exploration of Practices, Attitudes and Influences. London: NSPCC.
34.
RingroseJEriksson BarajasK (2011) Gendered risks and opportunities? Exploring teen girls’ digital sexual identity in postfeminist media contexts. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics7(2): 121–138 , Special Issue: Postfeminism and the Mediation of Sex.
RingroseJHarveyLGillRLivingstoneS (2013) Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digitial image exchange. Feminist Theory14(3): 305–323.
37.
RiversINoretN (2010) ‘I h 8 u’: Findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal36(4): 643–671.
38.
SunCBridgesAJohnasonJEzzellM (2014) Pornography and the male sexual script: An analysis of consumption and sexual relations. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, e-publication ahead of print, 3 December.
39.
TaylorMHollandGQuayleE (2001) Typology of paedophile picture collections. The Police Journal74(2): 97–107.
40.
VizardEHickeyNFrenchLMcCroryE (2007) Children and adolescents who present with sexually abusive behaviour: A UK descriptive study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology18(1): 59–73.
41.
WolakJFinklehorD (2011) Sexting: A Typology. University of New Hampshire, USA: Crimes Against Children Research Centre.
42.
WortleyRSmallboneS (2006) (eds) Situational Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse, Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press, and Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
