Research suggests that mentoring may facilitate offender rehabilitation. Less is known about the impact on mentors, especially those who are ex-offenders. This study uses in-depth interviews with eight ex-offender mentors to explore the processes through which such schemes can be effective. Four key categories emerged: self-satisfaction; mutual benefit; mechanisms underlying success; and negative aspects of mentoring. Mentoring was experienced as a rewarding and mutually beneficial career which may reduce the social stigma of being an ex-offender. Challenges for mentors included dealing with failure or frustration and managing risk. Findings suggest that participation in mentoring schemes should be voluntary rather than compulsory and future schemes should consider employing ex-offenders as mentors and role models, to benefit from their lived experience, despite the barriers and challenges involved.
AustinWWorchelS (2008) The Social Psychology of Inter-group Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
2.
BazemoreGMaloneyD (1994) Rehabilitating community service: Toward restorative service sanctions in a balanced justice system. Federal Probation Journal58: 24–35.
3.
BazemoreGStinchcombJ (2004) A civic engagement model of re-entry: Involving community through service and restorative justice. Federal Probation Journal68: 1–14.
4.
BrunsteinJMaierG (2005) Implicit and self-attributed motives to achieve: Two separate but interacting needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89: 205–222.
5.
CelinskaK (2000) Volunteering in ex-offenders’ readjustment: Reducing the stigma of imprisonment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation30: 90–116.
6.
FarrantFLevensonJ (2002) Barred Citizens: Volunteering and Active Citizenship by Prisoners. London: Prison Reform Trust.
7.
FarringtonDP (1992) Criminal career research in the United Kingdom. Journal of Crime & Justice Studies32: 531–536.
8.
FarringtonDPCoidJHarnettLJolliefDSoteriouNTurnerRWestD (2006) Criminal Careers up to Age 50 and Life Success up to Age 48 : New Findings From the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. London: Home Office.
9.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
10.
GrahamJBowlingB (1995) Young People and Crime, Home Office Research Study No 145. London: UK Home Office.
HolzerJHRaphaelSStollMA (2003) Employment Barriers facing Ex-Offenders. In: Employment Dimensions of Re-entry: Understanding the Nexus between Prisoner Re-entry and Work. New York, USA: University Law School.
13.
HunterG (2009) Preparing for employment: Prisoners' experience of participating in a prison training programme. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice48: 117–131.
KazemianL (2007) Desistance from crime: Theoretical, empirical, methodological, and policy considerations. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice23: 5–27.
17.
LaubJSampsonR (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
McCullochP (2005) Probation, social context and desistance: Retracing the relationship. Probation Journal52: 8–22.
19.
MartinAMarshH (2011) Fear of failure: Friend or foe?Australian Psychological Society38: 31–38.
20.
MarunaS (2001) Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
21.
Ministry of Justice (2010) Breaking the Negative Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders, Green Paper Evidence Report. London: Ministry of Justice.
22.
Philip K and Hendry LB (2000) Making sense of mentoring or mentoring making sense? Reflections on the mentoring process by adult mentors with young people. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology10: 211–223.
23.
RaginsBRCottonJLMillerJS (2000) Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal43: 1177–1194.
24.
SampsonRLaubJ (1996) Socioeconomic achievement in the life course of disadvantaged men: Military service as a turning point, circa 1940−1965. American Sociological Review61: 347–367.
25.
SuttonJ (1994) Learning to better predict the future: National Parole Board risk-assessment training. Forum on Corrections Research6: 20–22.
26.
TowlGJMcDougallC (1999) What do Forensic psychologists do? Current and Future Directions in the Prison and Probation Services, Issues in Forensic Psychology, No. 1. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
27.
TowlGJSnowLMcHughMJ (eds) (2000) Suicide in Prisons. Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
VargheseFHardinEBauerRMorganR (2009) Attitudes toward hiring offenders: The roles of criminal history, job qualifications, and race. Journal of Offender Therapy a Comparative Criminology5, 769–782.
29.
WhiteWL (2000) The history of recovered people as wounded healers: II. The era of professionalisation and specialization. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly18: 1–25.
