The author argues that a major challenge of Maruna, Porter and Carvalho’s paper and other work detailing similar research, lies not only in its questioning of how probation work should be undertaken, but also of how it should actually be conceived. In particular, he considers that this body of work undermines the correctionalist paradigm which often dominates current interpretations of effective practice.
Barry, M. (2000) ‘The mentor/monitor debate in criminal justice: What works for offenders’ , in British Journal of Social Work30, pp. 575-595 .
2.
Batchelor, S. & McNeill, F. (forthcoming) ‘The Young Person-Worker Relationship’, in T. Bateman and J. Pitts (eds) The Russell House Companion to Youth Justice. London: Russell House Publishing .
3.
Bottoms, A. & McWilliams, W. (1979) ‘A non-treatment paradigm for probation practice’ , in British Journal of Social Work9, pp. 159-202 .
4.
Burnett, R. (2003) ‘ One-to-one ways of promoting desistance: in search of an evidence base’ . Unpublished paper presented to the Probation Studies Unit Colloquium, Oxford, July-August 2003.
5.
Farrall, S. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton: Willan Publishing .
6.
Holt, P. (2000) Case management: context for supervision, Community and CriminalJustice Monograph 2. Leicester: De Montfort University .
7.
Hopkinson, J. & Rex, S. (2003) ‘Essential Skills in Working with Offenders’, in W.H. Chui and M. Nellis (eds) Moving probation forward: evidence, arguments and practice. Harlow: Pearson Education .
8.
Maruna, S. (2001) Making Good. How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington DC: American Psychological Association .
9.
Maruna, S. , Immarigeon, I. & LeBel, T. (2004) ‘Ex-offender Reintegration: Theory and Practice’, in Maruna S. and Immarigeon, I. (2004) (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration. Cullompton: Willan Publishing .
10.
McNeill, F. (2003) ‘Desistance-Focused Probation Practice’, in W.H. Chui and M. Nellis (eds) Moving probation forward: evidence, arguments and practice. Harlow: Pearson Education .
11.
McNeill, F. (forthcoming) ‘Desistance, Rehabilitation and Correctionalism: Prospects and Developments in Scotland’ , in the Howard Journal of Criminal Justice.
12.
McNeill, F. & Batchelor, S. (2004), ‘Persistent Offending by Young People: Developing Practice’, Issues in Community and Criminal Justice. Monograph Number 3. London: NAPO .
13.
Rex, S. (1999) ‘Desistance from Offending: Experiences of Probation’Howard Journal of Criminal Justice38 (4), pp. 366-383 .
14.
Robinson, G. (2001) ‘Power, knowledge and “What Works” in Probation’ , in Howard Journal of Criminal Justice40 (3), pp. 235-254 .
15.
Sykes, G. & Matza, D. (1957) ‘Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency’ , in American Sociological Review22, pp. 664-670 .
16.
White, W. (2000) ‘ Toward a new recovery movement: historical reflections on recovery, treatment and advocacy.’ Paper presented at the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Recovery Community Support Program Conference, Alexandria, Virginia, April 2000.
