Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Drawing upon the implementation of the Intensive Alternative to Custody in Greater Manchester, this article explores the key concerns voiced by sentencers when presented with a Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) proposing an ‘alternative to custody’. It is argued that the crucial element for effective implementation lies in the gatekeeping provided by PSR authors (probation staff), the dissemination of timely and relevant information to sentencers, and the reassurance that the order fulfils the requisite ‘penal punch’ to avoid accusations of ‘soft options’.

Keywords

alternatives to custody confidence pre-sentence reports probation sentencing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albertson

Ellingworth

Fox

(2010) Break Even Analysis of Intensive Alternatives to Custody Programme. On behalf of the Hallam Centre for Community Justice, Sheffield Hallam University.

Aos

Drake

(2010) Examining policy options in sentencing and corrections. Available at: http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/pub.asp?docid=10-08-1201 (accessed 29 May 2012).

Ashworth

(2002) European sentencing traditions. In: Tata

Hutton

(eds) Sentencing and Society. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Berman

(2012) Prison Population Statistics (24 May 2012). House of Commons Library.

Bishop

(1988) Non-Custodial Alternatives in Europe, Publication No. 14. Helsinki: HEUNI.

Brownlee

(1998) Community Punishment: A Critical Introduction. London: Longman.

Clear

Austin

(2009) Reducing mass incarceration: Implications of the iron law of prison populations. Harvard Law and Policy Review 3: 307−324.

Drakeford

(1993) The Probation Service, Breach and the Criminal Justice Act 1991. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 32(4): 291−303.

Economist (2012) Smart on crime, 5 May. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/21554207 (accessed 31 May 2012).

10.

Esmeé Fairbairn Foundation (2004) Crime, Courts & Confidence: Report of an Independent Inquiry into Alternatives to Prison. London: Esmeé Fairbairn Foundation. Available at: http://esmeefairbairn.org.uk/news-and-learning/publications/crime-courts-and-confidence---report-of-an-independent-inquiry-into-alterna

11.

Fox

(2010) Could economics solve the prison crisis? Probation Journal 57(3): 263−280.

12.

Gelb

(2006) Myths and Misconceptions: Public Opinion versus Public Judgement about Sentencing. Melbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council.

13.

Gelsthorpe

Raynor

(1995) Quality and effectiveness in probation officers reports to sentencers. British Journal of Criminology 35(2): 188−200.

14.

GMPT (2009) Intensive Alternative to Custody (IAC). Available at: http://www.gm-probation.org.uk/what-we-do/intensive-alternative-to-custody.php

15.

Hearndon

Millie

(2004) Does tougher enforcement lead to lower reconviction? Probation Journal 51(1): 48−58.

16.

Hough

Jacobson

Millie

(2003) The Decision to Imprison: Sentencing and the Prison Population. London: Prison Reform Trust.

17.

Lappi-Seppala

(2001) Reducing the prison population in Finland. VISTA 6(3): 256−279.

18.

Mackenzie

Spiranovic

Warner

Stobbs

Indermaur

Roberts

Broadhurst

Bouhours

Gelb

(2012) Sentencing and public confidence: Results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 45(1): 45−65.

19.

Mair

(2004) Diversionary and non-supervisory approaches to dealing with offenders. In: Bottoms

Rex

Robinson

, Alternatives to Prison; Options for an Insecure Society. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

20.

Mair

Cross

Taylor

(2007) The Use and Impact of the Community Order and the Suspended Sentence Order. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

21.

Mair

Cross

Taylor

(2008) The Community Order and the Suspended Sentence Order: The Views and Attitudes of Sentencers. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

22.

Marsh

Fox

Sarmah

(2009) Is custody an effective sentencing option for the UK? Evidence from a meta-analysis of existing studies. Probation Journal 56(2): 129−151.

23.

Matrix Knowledge Group (2007) The Economic Case for and Against Prison. London: Matrix Knowledge Group. Available at: http://www.matrixknowledge.com/Documents/economic-case-for-and-against-prison.pdf

24.

Millie

Jacobson

Hough

(2003) Understanding the growth in the prison population in England and Wales. Criminal Justice 3(4): 369−387.

25.

Millie

Tombs

Hough

(2007) Borderline Sentencing: A Comparison of Sentencers’ Decision Making in England and Wales, and Scotland. London: SAGE.

26.

Mills

(2011) The ‘alternative to custody’ Myth. Criminal Justice Matters 83(1): 34−36.

27.

Ministry of Justice (2010a) Probation statistics quarterly brief October to December 2009 statistical tables. Available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/probationquarterly.htm

28.

Ministry of Justice (2010b) Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders, December 2010. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20111121205348/http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/consultations/breaking-the-cycle.pdf

29.

Ministry of Justice (2011) Research Summary: Evaluation of the Intensive Alternative to Custody Pilots. London: Ministry of Justice.

30.

Ministry of Justice (2012) Punishment and Reform: Effective Community Sentences. London: Ministry of Justice.

31.

Morgan

(2003) Thinking about the demand for probation services. Probation Journal 50(1): 7–19.

32.

Nellis

(1995) Probation values for the 1990s. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 34: 19−44.

33.

Padfield

(2011) Time to bury the custody ‘threshold’? Criminal Law Review 8: 593−612.

34.

Prison Reform Trust (2009) Bromley Prison Briefing. London: Prison Reform Trust.

35.

Raine

(2005) Courts, sentencing and justice in a changing political and managerial context. Public Money & Management 25(5): 290−298.

36.

Roberts

Gabor

(2004) Living in the shadow of prison: Lessons from the Canadian experience in decarceration. British Journal of Criminology 44(1): 92−112.

37.

Robinson

McNeill

(2008) Exploring the dynamics of compliance with community penalties. Theoretical Criminology 12(4): 431−449.

38.

Rush

Robertson

(1987) Pre-sentence reports: The utility of information to the sentencing decision. Law and Human Behaviour 11(2): 147−155.

39.

Stern

(2002) Developing Alternatives to Prison in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A Guidance Handbook. London: International Centre for Prison Studies.

40.

Tata

Burns

Halliday

Hutton

McNeill

(2008) Assisting and advising in the sentencing decision process. British Journal of Criminology 48: 835−845.

41.

Taylor

(2009) Magistrates survey findings. GMPT (Unpublished).

42.

Trebilcock

(2011) No Winners: The Reality of Short Term Prison Sentences. London: The Howard League for Penal Reform.

43.

Walmsley

(2003) Global incarceration and prison trends. Forum on Crime and Society 3(1/2): 65−78.

44.

Walters

(2004) Building alternatives to custody: Lessons from the Czech Republic and other European states. VISTA 9(3): 100−103.

45.

Whitehead

(2010) Exploring Modern Probation: Social Theory and Organisational Complexity. Bristol: The Policy Press.

46.

Williams

Clarke

(2008) A perpetual sense of crisis… how to spend the £40 million. Safer Communities 7(3): 9−13.

47.

Worrall

Mawby

(2004) Intensive projects for prolific/persistent offenders. In: Bottoms

Rex

Robinson

(eds) Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

The Intensive Alternative to Custody

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References