This article examines astropolitics beyond the realm of Big Science, focusing on three interconnected Mexican space initiatives from 1958 to 1977: the Mexican Delegation at the UN Commission on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space; the Empalme-Guaymas tracking station for Project Mercury; and the National Outer Space Commission. Employing a multi-archival and multi-linguistic approach, it explores how the Mexican state navigated the Cold War’s demands for technoscientific and legal expertise in the field of outer space. The analysis unfolds on three scales: Mexico’s assertion in international space governance; its collaborative yet uneven relationship with the U.S.; and the internal political dynamics that highlighted the need for specialized institutions. While these projects aimed to promote the Revolutionary principle of social justice through economic development, limited resources and a lack of technical expertise hindered their success. By focusing on how material conditions shape the grounds of possibility for technoscientific projects, this article offers a critical reappraisal of the category of astropolitics. It demonstrates that the absence of large-scale space projects does not indicate the absence of astropolitics, but rather the form astropolitics takes in under-resourced countries.
Adamson M and Lalli R (2021) Global perspectives on science diplomacy: Exploring the diplomacy knowledge nexus in contemporary histories of science. Centaurus 63(1): 1–16.
2.
ÁlvarezR (1986) La Estación Rastreadora de Guaymas. Las Actividades Espaciales en México: una revisión crítica. Gall, R (ed.) Mexico, D.F.: SEP/FCE/CONACYT, pp. 117–120.
3.
AronovaEBakerKOreskesN (2010)
Big science and big data in biology: From the international geophysical year through the international biological program to the long-term ecological research (LTER) Network, 1957–Present. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences40(2): 183–224.
4.
BarkerJ (2005)
Engineers and political dreams: Indonesia in the satellite age. Current Anthropology46(5): 703–727.
5.
BalbiGFickersA (2020) Introduction: The ITU as Actor, Arena and Antenna of Techno-Diplomacy. In: BalbiGFickerA (eds) History of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU): Transnational Techno-Diplomacy from the Telegraph to the Internet.
Berlin:
DeGruyter: 1–14.
6.
BartolucciJ (2000) La modernización de la ciencia en México: el caso de los astrónomos.
Mexico:
Plaza y Valdés.
7.
BeckermanF (2016)
El desarrollo de la investigación científica en Argentina desde 1950: entre las universidades nacionales y el Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Revista iberoamericana de educación superior7 (18): 3–23.
8.
BlinderD (2015)
El origen del misil Cóndor II (1976–1983). Dictadura, Guerra y disuasión. Saber y Tiempo1(1): 60–82.
9.
BobadillaL (2008)
The exclusion of Cuba from the Organization of American States: Diplomatic disagreements between Mexico and the United States in 1962. Istor: Revista de Historia internacional33: 58–76.
10.
Comité Organisateur des Jeux de la XIX Olympiade (1969) L’olympiade Culturelle. Vol.
4.
Mexico, D.F:
Comité organisateur des Jeux de la XIX Olympiade.
11.
CONEE (1970) Comisión Nacional del Espacio Exterior 1965–1970.
Mexico, D.F.:
Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes.
12.
CONEE (1975) Reunión sobre el Aprovechamiento de los Datos Derivados de los Satélites Tecnológicos para el Estudio de los Recursos Naturales.
México, D.F.:
CONEE.
Dolman, E (2001) Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age. London, Frank Cass.
15.
DomínguezR (2000) Historia de la física nuclear en México, 1933–1963,
México, D.F.:
CESU/Plaza y Valdés/UNAM.
16.
EdgertonD (2007)
The contradictions of techno-nationalism and techno-globalism: A historical perspective. New Global Studies1(1): 1–32.
17.
FroehlichADiego AlonsoASDe MarchiE (2020). Space Supporting Latin America: Latin America’s Emerging Space Middle Powers.
Cham:
ESPI/Springer.
18.
GalisonPHevlyB (eds.) (1992) Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research.
Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
19.
GallR (1987) Las Actividades Espaciales en México.
Mexico, D.F.:
SEP/FCE/CONACYT.
20.
GallRÁlvarezR (1986) La Comisión Nacional del Espacio Exterior en México. In: GallR (ed.) Evaluación de Sus Actividades. Las Actividades Espaciales en México.
Mexico, D.F.:
SEP/FCE/CONACYT, pp.108–116.
21.
GallO (2001)
Estado federal y grupos de poder regionales frente el indigenismo, el mestizaje y el discurso multiculturalista: pasado y presente del racismo en México. Debate Feminista24: 88–115.
22.
GarcíaRA (1966)
La Desnuclearización de la América Latina. Foro Internacional vi (2–3): 323–340.
23.
GeppertA (2012)
Rethinking the space age: Astroculture and technoscience, 1900–1975. History and Technology28(3): 219–223.
24.
GleijesesP (2021) Shattered Hope: The Guatemalan Revolution and the United States, 1944–1954.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
25.
Gómez-GalvarriatoA (2020)
La construcción del milagro mexicano: el Instituto Mexicano de Investigaciones Tecnológicas, el Banco de México y la Armour Research Foundation. Historia Mexicana69(3): 1247–1309.
26.
GonzálezC (2012) “¡Muy Buenas Noches, México!” Mexico, Television and the Cold War.
Nebraska:
University of Nebraska Press.
27.
GormanA (2019) Dr. Space Junk vs the Universe: Archaeology and the Future.
London:
MIT Press.
28.
GrimwoodJ (1963) Project Mercury: A Chronology.
Washington, DC:
NASA.
29.
HechtG (2011) Introduction. In: GabrielleH (ed.) Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War.
Cambridge:
MIT Press, pp.1–12.
30.
Hernández RodríguezR (2015) La política. Los desafíos al proyecto de nación. In: HernándezR (ed.) Adolfo López Mateos, Una Vida Dedicada a la Política.
México:
Colegio de México, pp.221–272.
31.
HuntleyW (2011) Moderate space powers. In: EdgarS (ed.) The Politics of Space. A Survey.
London:
Routledge, pp. 77–103.
32.
ItoKRentetziM (2021)
The material culture and politics of artifacts in nuclear diplomacy. Centaurus63: 233–243.
33.
JohnsonAW (2023a) Mexican Mars: Narrating spatial futures from the margins. In: FroehlichA (ed.) Outer Space and Popular Culture: Influences and Interrelations.
Cham:
Springer International Publishing, pp.1–15.
34.
KrigeJ (2007) Nasa as an instrument of U.S. foreign policy. In: DickSLauniusRD (eds) Societal Impact of Spaceflight.
Washington, DC:
NASA, pp.207–218.
35.
LajousR (2012) Historia Mínima de Las Relaciones Exteriores de México, 1821–2000.
Mexico:
El Colegio de México.
36.
LoaezaS (2005) La presidencia de Gustavo Díaz Ordaz y las insuficiencias de la presidencia autoritaria. In: FowlerW (ed.) Los Presidentes Mexicanos, Siglo XX,
Mexico:
INEHRM, pp.287–335.
37.
LoaezaS (2016)
La fractura mexicana y el golpe de 1954 en Guatemala. Historia Mexicana66(2): 725–791.
38.
L’olympiade Culturelle (1969) Comité organisateur des Jeux de la XIX Olympiade. México, D.F. Comité organisateur des Jeux de la XIX Olympiade.
39.
MacDonaldF (2007)
Anti-Astropolitik – Outer space and the orbit of geography. Progress in Human Geography31(5): 592–615.
40.
Masson-ZwaanTCassarR (2019) The peaceful uses of outer space. In: ChestermanSMaloneDVillalpandoS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Treaties.
New York:
Oxford University Press, pp.181–198.
41.
MateosGSuárezE (2014) Peaceful atoms in Mexico. In: MedinaEda Costa MarquesIHolmesC (eds) Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America.
Cambridge/London:
The MIT Press, pp.287–303.
42.
MateosGSuárez-DíazE (2015)
‘We are not a rich country to waste our resources on expensive toys’: Mexico’s version of Atoms for Peace. History and Technology31(3): 243–258.
43.
MateosGSuárez-DíazE (2019) Technical assistance in movement: Nuclear knowledge crosses Latin American borders. In: KrigeJ (ed.) How Knowledge Moves: Writing the Transnational History of Science and Technology.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 345–367.
44.
Mitchell ST. (2017) Constellations of inequality: space, race, and utopia in Brazil. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
NASA (1963) Mercury Project Summary.
NASA:
Washington, DC.
46.
Morán LópezJLMartínez MendozaJR (2020)
El desarrollo de la Física en San Luis Potosí Parte 2: de la fundación de la Escuela e Instituto de Física a la actualidad. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Física34(3): 145–157.
47.
RedfieldP (2000) Space in the Tropics: From Convicts to Rockets in French Guiana.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
48.
Nicolini GabrielJPCobaledaAS (2023)
Tlatelolco Treaty: The global south’s postcolonial contestation of the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Peace Review35(4): 749–761.
49.
RobinetR (2023) La Revolución Mexicana: una Historia Estudiantil.
México:
Bonilla Artigas.
50.
RobinsonSAdamsonMBarrettG, et al. (2023)
The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: A historical exploration. Science and Public Policy749–758.
51.
SharmaP (2022)
Satellite instructional television experiment (SITE): A case study in the triumphs and frustrations of state-sponsored science in India. Indian Journal of History of Science57: 37–48.
52.
SiddiqiA (2016)
Another global history of science: Making space for India and China. BJHS Themes
1: 115–143.
53.
Suárez DíazJ (1962)
Proyecto Mercurio. Revista Comunicaciones y Transportes▪: 47–74.
54.
TelloM (1961) México. Tracking stations. In: US Congress, United States Treaties and Other International Agreements, Volume II, Part 2. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp.1330–1338.
55.
TsiaoS (2008) “Read You Loud and Clear!”: The Story of NASA’s Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network.
Washington, DC:
NASA.
56.
United Nations (1958 to 1970) Yearbook of the United Nations.
New York:
Department of Public Information of the United Nations.
57.
United Nations (1964) Yearbook of the United Nations. New York: UN Dept. of Public Information.
58.
US Congress, 1961 is actually: Tello M (1961) México. Tracking Stations. US Congress, United States Treaties and Other International Agreements, Volume II, Part 2. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 1330–1338.
59.
US House of Representatives (1961) Project Mercury. Second Interim Report. US House of Representatives, Eighty-seventh Congress. First Session [serial h], 29 June 1961. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Press.
60.
Velázquez Flores R and Ochoa Bilbao L (2023) Alfonso García Robles: Architect of Disarmament. Latin American Thinkers of Peace. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 55–81.
61.
ZolovE (2004)
Showcasing the ‘Land of Tomorrow: Mexico and the 1968 Olympics. The Americas61(2): 159–188.
62.
ZolovE (2020) The Last Good Neighbor: Mexico in the Global Sixties.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
