Counter-forensics emerged in order to deploy scientific investigative techniques usually wielded by the state against the state. In this article, we theorize how a counter-forensic approach can inform geographical approaches to the study of images. Our counter-forensic approach centers the material and semantic instability of images and highlights the indeterminacy of meaning and thus, the importance of the discursive activity of articulating the relationship between images and political claims. The article offers two case studies that deploy this approach. The first engages with cell phone images made by migrants at sea, showing how they can be read as evidence of the broader spatial politics of Europe’s external borders. The second case study examines the materiality of ultrasound technologies in relation to the changing legal terrain of abortion politics in the United States. Both studies use images as openings to intervene in contested politics that are part of the production of uneven geographies of state domination and control.
Abu HamdanL (2014) Aural contract: Forensic listening and the reorganizaton of the speaking subject. In: FrankeAWeizmanEHaus der Kulturen derWelt (eds) Forensis: The Architecture of Public Truth.
Berlin:
Sternberg Press, pp. 65–82.
2.
AzoulayA (2008) The Civil Contract of Photography.
New York/Cambridge, MA:
Zone Books ; Distributed by The MIT Press.
3.
AzoulayA (2010)
What is a photograph? What is photography?Philosophy of Photography1(1): 9–13.
4.
BaradK (1998)
Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences10(2): 87.
5.
BaradKM (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
6.
BestARamírezMM (2021)
Urban specters. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space39(6): 1043–1054.
7.
ButlerJ (2013) Endangered/endangering: Schematic racism and white paranoia. In: Gooding-Williams R (ed) Reading Rodney King/Reading Urban Uprising.
London:
Routledge, pp. 15–22.
8.
CamptT (2017) Listening to Images.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
9.
CobarrubiasS (2019)
Mapping illegality: The i‐map and the cartopolitics of “migration management” at a distance. Antipode51(3): 770–794.
10.
CollsRFanninM (2013)
Placental surfaces and the geographies of bodily interiors. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space45(5): 1087–1104.
11.
CrawleyHDüvellFJones K, , McMahon S and Sigona N.(2015) Destination Europe? Understanding the dynamics and drivers of Mediterranean migration in 2015. Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations at Coventry University, Coventry
12.
De LeónJ (2015) The Land of Open Graves: Living and Dying on the Migrant Trail.
Oakland, CA:
University of California Press.
13.
della DoraV (2009)
Travelling landscape-objects. Progress in Human Geography33(3): 334–354.
14.
DenbowJM (2015) Governed through Choice: Autonomy, Technology, and the Politics of Reproduction.
New York:
New York University Press.
15.
DotyRL (2011)
Bare life: Border-crossing deaths and spaces of Moral Alibi. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29(4): 599–612.
16.
EngelmannS (2020)
The forensics of form. Dialogues in Human Geography10(3): 362–365.
17.
GordonA (2008) Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
18.
GordonELarsenHK (2022)
‘Sea of blood’: The intended and unintended effects of criminalising humanitarian volunteers assisting migrants in distress at sea. Disasters46(1): 3–26.
19.
HallS (2016) Cultural Studies 1983: A Theoretical History (Slack JD and Grossberg L, eds). Durham: Duke University Press.
20.
HaylesNK (1993)
Virtual bodies and flickering signifiers. October66: 69–91.
21.
HellerC (2014) Fractured chains of custody. In: FrankeAWeizmanE, et al. (eds) Forensic Architecture (Project)Forensis: The Architecture of Public Truth.
Berlin:
Sternberg Press, pp. 693–699.
22.
HellerCPezzaniLStierlM (2017)
Disobedient sensing and border struggles at the maritime frontier of Europe. Spheres Journal for Digital Cultures (
#4 Media and Migration): 1–15.
23.
JeffreyA (2021)
Legal geography III: Evidence. Progress in Human Geography45(4): 902–913.
24.
JoyceK (2005)
Appealing images: Magnetic resonance imaging and the production of authoritative knowledge. Social Studies of Science35(3): 437–462.
25.
KeatingTP (2023)
On the technological unconscious: Thinking the (a)signifying production of subjects and bodies with sonographic imaging. Social & Cultural Geography24(9): 1481–1500.
26.
KeenanT (2002)
Publicity and indifference (sarajevo on television). Publications of the Modern Language Association of America117(1): 104–116.
27.
KeenanT (2014a)
Counter-forensics and photography. Grey Room55: 58–77.
28.
KeenanT (2014b) Getting the dead to tell me what happened: Justice, prosopopoeia, and forensic afterlives. In: Forensic Architecture (ed.) Forensis: The Architecture of Public Truth.
London:
Sternberg Press and Forensic Architecture, pp. 35–55.
29.
KeenanTWeizmanE (2012) Mengele’s Skull: The Advent of a Forensic Aesthetics.
Berlin:
Sternberg Press/Portikus.
Laing EbbensgaardC (2024)
Light violence at the threshold of acceptability. Urban Studies61(4): 669–686.
32.
LatourB (2005) From realpolitik to dingpolitik or how to make things public. In: LatourBWeibelP (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy.
Cambridge, MA/London, England:
ZKM Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe and MIT Press, pp. 4–31.
MirankerMGiordanoA (2020)
Text mining and semantic triples: Spatial analyses of text in applied humanitarian forensic research. Digital Geography and Society1: 100005.
37.
MountzA (2010) Seeking Asylum: Human Smuggling and Bureaucracy at the Border.
Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
38.
No More Deaths, La Coalición de Derechos Humanos and The Abuse Documentation Working Group (2015) Disappeared: How the US Border Enforcement Agencies Are Fueling a Missing Persons Crisis. Available at: www.thedisappearedreport.org/ (accessed 4 April 2022).
39.
PalmerJ (2009)
the placental body in 4D: Everyday practices of non-diagnostic sonography. Feminist Review93(1): 64–80.
40.
PetcheskyRP (1987)
Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies13(2): 263.
PezzaniLHellerC (2013)
A disobedient gaze: Strategic interventions in the knowledge(s) of maritime borders. Postcolonial Studies16(3): 289–298.
43.
RancièreJ (2006) The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible.
London/New York:
Continuum.
44.
RobertsE (2013)
Geography and the visual image: A hauntological approach. Progress in Human Geography37(3): 386–402.
45.
RomanillosJL (2015)
Mortal questions: Geographies on the other side of life. Progress in Human Geography39(5): 560–579.
46.
RoseG (2003)
Family photographs and domestic spacings: A case study. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers28(1): 5–18.
47.
SakrLS (2021) Reframing the Arab spring: On data mining and the field of Arab Internet studies. In: Strohmaier A and Krewani A (eds) Media and Mapping Practices in the Middle East and North Africa: Producing Space. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Available at: www.aup.nl/en/book/9789462989092 (accessed 14 September 2022).
48.
ScheptJ (2014)
(Un) seeing like a prison: Counter-visual ethnography of the carceral state. Theoretical Criminology18(2): 198–223.
49.
SchuppliS (2020) Material Witness: Media, Forensics, Evidence.
Leonardo. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press.
50.
SekulaA (2014)
Photography and the limits of national identity. Grey Room55: 28–33.
51.
SharpJ (2021)
Materials, forensics and feminist geopolitics. Progress in Human Geography45(5): 990–1002.
52.
SoniNJArntfieldRKoryP (2020) Point-of-Care Ultrasound. Second edition.
Philadelphia, PA:
Elsevier.
53.
SteinbergPE (2009)
Sovereignty, territory, and the mapping of mobility: A view from the outside. Annals of the Association of American Geographers99(3): 467–495.
StoverE (2007) The Witnesses: War Crimes and the Promise of Justice in The Hague.
Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia:
Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
van HoutumHBueno LacyR (2020)
The migration map trap. On the invasion arrows in the cartography of migration. Mobilities15(2): 196–219.
58.
WeizmanE (2011) The Least of All Possible Evils: A Short History of Humanitarian Violence. Paperback edition.
London/New York:
Verso.
59.
WeizmanE (2014) Introduction: Forensis. In: Forensis: The Architecture of Public Truth. Berlin: Sternberg Press and Forensic Architecture, pp. 9–32.
60.
WeizmanEFullerM (2021) Investigative aesthetics: Conflicts and commons in the politics of truth.
London:
Verso Books.
61.
WieviorkaA (2006) The Era of the Witness.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
62.
WolbarstAB (1999) Looking within: How X-Ray, CT, MRI, Ultrasound, and Other Medical Images Are Created, and How They Help Physicians Save Lives.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
63.
ZagzebskiJA (1996) Essentials of Ultrasound Physics.
St. Louis:
Mosby.
