The opening of a post-genomic age and the possibility of patenting life itself have changed the relationship between biopolitics and capitalism and contributed to the emergence of a new phase of capitalist accumulation, currently known as biocapitalism, the full integration of life and capital into complex architectures of control and ownership. In this paper, we combine Giorgio Agamben’s concepts of the threshold and bios/zoē with Nicole Shukin’s idea of rendering to address the connection between life and death in biocapitalism, through a specific focus on the commercialisation of the semen of the Piedmontese bulls. We show how death, rather than merely life, is productive in biocapitalism. Further, in proposing an analysis of some of the ways in which, social and biological, animal life gets incorporated (i.e. owned and sold), we contribute to recent debates in geography on more-than-human understanding of capital accumulation.
AgambenG (1998) Homo Sacer, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AgambenG (1999) Potentialities, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
AgambenG (2004) The Open: Man and Animal, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
AgambenG (2005) State of Exception, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Anaborapi (2013) Relazione Tecnica e Statistica, Carrù: Anaborapi.
6.
ArthurPF (1995) Double muscling in cattle: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research46(8): 1493–1515.
7.
AsdalKDruglitrøTHinchliffeS (forthcoming) Humans, Animals and Biopolitics, The More than Human Condition. London: Routledge.
8.
BaruaM (2014a) Bio-geo-graphy: landscape, dwelling and the political ecology of human–elephant relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32: 915–934.
9.
BaruaM (2014b) Volatile ecologies: towards a material politics of human-animal relations. Environment and Planning A46(6): 1462–1478.
10.
BaruaM (2016) Lively commodities and encounter value. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 34(4): 725–744.
11.
BearC (2011) Being Angelica? Exploring individual animal geographies. Area43(3): 297–304.
12.
BiermannCMansfieldB (2014) Biodiversity, purity, and death: conservation biology as biopolitics. Environment and Planning D32: 257–273.
13.
BirchKTyfieldD (2013) Theorizing the bioeconomy: Biovalue, biocapital, bioeconomics or … What?Science, Technology and Human Values38(3): 299–327.
14.
BraunB (2007) Biopolitics and the molecularization of life. Cultural Geographies14: 6–28.
15.
BullerH (2013) Individuation, the mass and farm animals. Theory, Culture Society30(7/8): 155–175.
16.
CalarcoM (2008) Zoographies, New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
ColeM (2011) From ‘Animal Machines’ to ‘Happy Meat’? Foucault’s Ideas of Disciplinary and Pastoral Power Applied to ‘Animal-Centred’ Welfare Discourse. Animals1(1): 83–101.
18.
CollardRC (2014) Putting animals back together, taking commodities apart. Annals of the Association of American Geographers104(1): 151–165.
19.
CollardRCDempseyJ (2013) Life for sale? The politics of lively commodities. Environment and Planning A45: 2682–2699.
20.
ColombinoAGiaccariaP (2015) Breed contra Beef: the making of Piedmontese cattle. In: EmelJNeoH (eds) Political Ecologies of Meat, New York: Routledge, pp. 161–177.
21.
CookIet al. (2006) Geographies of food: following. Progress in Human Geography30: 655–666.
22.
CooperM (2008) Life as Surplus, Seattle: University of Washington Press.
23.
FedericiS (2004) Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation, Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.
24.
FlowerMJHeathD (1993) Micro-anatomo politics: mapping the human genome project. Culture, Medicine and Phsychiatry17: 27–41.
25.
FoucaultM (2003) Society Must Be Defended, London: Macmillan.
26.
GinnF (2014) Death, absence and afterlife in the garden. Cultural Geographies21(2): 229–245.
27.
GreenhoughBRoeE (2006) Towards a geography of bodily biotechnologies. Environment and Planning A38(3): 416–422.
28.
Guthman J and DuPuis M (2006) Embodying neoliberalism: economy, culture, and the politics of fat. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24(3): 427–448.
29.
HarawayDJ (2008) When species meet, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
HelmreichS (2008) Species of biocapital. Science as Culture17: 463–478.
31.
HigginMEvansAMieleM (2011) A good kill: Socio-technical organisations of farm animal slaughter. In: CharlesNCarterR (eds) Human and Other Animals: Critical Perspectives, London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 173–194.
32.
HodgettsTLorimerJ (2014) Methodologies for animals’ geographies: cultures, communication and genomics. Cultural Geographies22(2): 285–295.
33.
HollowayL (2015) Biopower and an ecology of genes: seeing livestock as meat via genetics. In: EmelJNeoH (eds) Political Ecologies of Meat, London: Earthscan, pp. 178–194.
34.
HollowayLMorrisC (2008) Boosted bodies: Genetic techniques, domestic livestock bodies and complex representations of life. Geoforum39(5): 1709–1720.
35.
HollowayLMorrisC (2012) Contesting genetic knowledge-practices in livestock breeding: Biopower, biosocial collectivities, and heterogeneous resistances. Environment and Planning D30(1): 60.
36.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
LopezPGillespieKA (2015) Economies of Death. Economic logics of killable life and grievable death, New York: Routledge.
38.
LorimerJDriessenC (2013) Bovine biopolitics and the promise of monsters in the rewilding of Heck cattle. Geoforum48: 249–259.
39.
MansfieldB (2003) Spatializing globalization: a ‘geography of quality’ in the seafood industry. Economic Geography79(1): 1–16.
40.
MansfieldB (2012) Gendered biopolitics of public health: regulation and discipline in seafood consumption advisories. Environment and Planning D30(4): 588–602.
41.
McDowellL (2015) Roepke lecture in economic geography – the lives of others: body work, the production of difference, and labor geographies. Economic Geography91(1): 1–23.
42.
MieleM (2011) The taste of happiness: free-range chicken. Environment and Planning A43(9): 2076–2090.
43.
Morini C and Fumagalli A (2010) Life put to work: Towards a life theory of value. Ephemera: theory & politics in organization 10(3/4): 234–252.
44.
MorrisCHollowayL (2014) Genetics and livestock breeding in the UK: co-constructing technologies and heterogeneous biosocial collectivities. Journal of Rural Studies33: 150–160.
45.
NegriA (2013) Biocapitalismo y constitución política del presente. In: CerbinoMGiuntaI (eds) Biocapitalismo, procesos de gobierno y movimientos sociales. 19–41.
46.
ParrE (2002) New body-geographies: the embodied spaces of health and medical information on the internet. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20(1): 73–95.
47.
ParryB (2008) Entangled exchange: reconceptualising the characterisation and practice of bodily commodification. Geoforum39(3): 1133–1144.
48.
ParryB (2015) A bull market? Devices of qualification and singularisation in the international marketing of US sperm. In: ParryBGreenhoughBBrownTDyckI (eds) Bodies across borders: the global circulation of body parts, medical tourists and professionals, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 53–72.
49.
ParryBGreenhoughBBrownTet al. (2015) Bodies Across Borders: The Global Circulation of Body Parts, Medical Tourists and Professionals, Farnham: Ashgate.
50.
RajanSK (2006) Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life, Durham: Duke University Press.
51.
RitvoH (2010) Noble Cows and Hybrid Zebras. Essays on Animals and History, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
52.
RobbinsP (1998) Shrines and butchers: animals as deities, capital, and meat in contemporary North India. In: WolchJEmelJ (eds) Animal Geographies. Place, Politics, and Identity in Nature-Culture Borderlands, London: Verso, pp. 218–240.
53.
Romanillos JL (2015) Mortal questions: Geographies on the other side of life. Progress in Human Geography 39(5): 560–579.
54.
RoseN (2006) The Politics of Life Itself, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
55.
RutherfordSRutherfordP (2013) Geography and biopolitics. Geography Compass7(6): 423–434.
56.
Schurr C (forthcoming) From biopolitics to bioeconomies: the A.R.T. of (re)producing white futures in Mexico’s surrogacy market.
57.
ShieldsR (2003) The Virtual, London: Routledge.
58.
ShukinN (2009) Animal Capital, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
59.
StraussJ (2012) Human Remains, New York: Fordham University Press.
60.
StyhreASundgrenM (2011) Venturing into the Bioeconomy: Professions, Innovation, Identity, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
TwineR (2010) Animals as Biotechnology, London: Routledge.
62.
VeltenH (2007) Cow, London: Reaktion.
63.
ViallesN (1994) Animal to Edible, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
WolfeC (2014) Before the Law, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
