This paper examines the neoliberal ideals that underpin participation and citizenship in the smart city and their replication mechanisms at the European level, particularly focusing on the work of the European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities. The research consisted of three levels of data generation and analysis: a discourse analysis of policy documents and project descriptions of the 61 Commitments in the European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities ‘citizen-focus’ cluster; interviews with a dozen stakeholders working on citizen engagement in a small sample of European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities flagship projects; and twenty interviews with city officers and corporate exhibitors at the 2017 Smart City Expo and World Congress. We contend that smart cities as currently conceived enact a blueprint of neoliberal urbanism and promote a form of neoliberal citizenship. Supra-national institutions like the European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities act at a multi-scalar level, connecting diverse forms of neoliberal urbanism whilst promoting policy agendas and projects that perform neoliberal citizenship in the spaces of the everyday. Despite attempts to recast the smart city as ‘citizen-focused’, smart urbanism remains rooted in pragmatic, instrumental and paternalistic discourses and practices rather than those of social rights, political citizenship, and the common good. In our view, if smart cities are to become truly ‘citizen-focused’, an alternative conception of smart citizenship needs to be deployed, one that enables an effective shift of power and is rooted in the right to the city, entitlements, community, participation, commons, and ideals beyond the market.
ArnsteinSR (1969)
A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35(4): 216–224.
2.
AttohKA (2011)
What kind of right is the right to the city?Progress in Human Geography35(5): 669–684.
3.
BarandiaranXCallejaAMonterdeAet al. (2017)
Decidim: Redes políticas y tecnopolíticas para la democracia participativa. RECERCA. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi21: 137–150.
4.
BrennerNSchmidC (2015)
Towards a new epistemology of the urban?City19(2–3): 151–182.
5.
BrennerNTheodoreN (2002)
Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode34(3): 349–379.
6.
BrennerNPeckJTheodoreN (2010)
Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks10(2): 182–222.
BrownW (2016)
Sacrificial citizenship: Neoliberalism, human capital, and austerity politics. Constellations23(1): 3–14.
9.
Burke WoodP (2017) Citizenship, Activism and the City.
London:
Routledge.
10.
CardulloPKitchinR (2019)
Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84(1): 1–13.
11.
CardulloPKitchinRDi FeliciantonioC (2018)
Living labs and vacancy in the neoliberal city. Cities73: 44–50.
ColauAAlemanyA (2012) Mortgaged lives: From the housing bubble to the right to housing. Los Angeles: Journal of Aesthetics and Protest Press. Available at: http://www.joaap.org/press/pah/mortgagedlives.pdf (accessed 18 February 2018).
14.
ColettaCHeaphyLKitchinR (2018) From the accidental to articulated smart city: The creation and work of ‘Smart Dublin’. European Urban and Regional Studies, pp. 1–16. Epub ahead of print. 13 July 2018. DOI: 10.1177/096977641878521.
15.
CowleyRJossSDayotY (2018)
The smart city and its publics: Insights from across six UK cities. Urban Research & Practice18(1): 53–77.
16.
DattaA (2018)
The digital turn in postcolonial urbanism: Smart citizenship in the making of India’s 100 smart cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43(3): 405–419.
EngelbertJvan ZoonenL and Hirzalla F (2019) Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142: 347–353.
FothMBrynskovMOjalaT (2015) Citizen’s Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking.
Singapore:
Springer.
23.
FullerM (ed) (2017) How to Be a Geek: Essays on the Culture of Software. Cambridge: Polity.
24.
GabrysJ (2014)
Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32(1): 30–48.
HollandsRG (2008)
Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?City12(3): 303–320.
29.
IsinEF (2000b) Introduction. In: IsinEF (ed) Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City.
London:
Routledge, pp.1–21.
30.
IsinEF (ed) (2000a) Democracy, Citizenship, and the Global City. London: Routledge.
31.
IsinEFRuppertE (2015) Being Digital Citizens.
London:
Rowman & Littlefield.
32.
IsinEFWoodPK (1999) Citizenship and Identity.
London:
SAGE.
33.
KitchinR (2014)
The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal79(1): 1–14.
34.
KitchinR (2015)
Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8(1): 131–136.
35.
KitchinRDodgeM (2011) Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
36.
KitchinRColettaCMcArdleG (2017a) Urban informatics, governmentality and the logics of urban control. Programmable City Working Paper 25. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/27hz8/ (accessed 7 June 2018).
37.
KitchinRColettaCEvansLet al. (2017b)
Smart cities, epistemic communities, advocacy coalitions and the ‘last mile’ problem. IT – Information Technology59(6): 275–284.
38.
KitchinRO’CallaghanCBoyleMet al. (2012)
Placing neoliberalism: The rise and fall of Ireland’s Celtic Tiger. Environment and Planning A44(6): 1302–1326.
39.
LazonickWMazzucatoM (2013)
The risk-reward nexus in the innovation–inequality relationship: Who takes the risks? Who gets the rewards?Industrial and Corporate Change22(4): 1093–1128.
40.
LefebvreH (1996) Writings on Cities.
Cambridge, Mass:
Blackwell.
41.
LombardiPVanoloA (2015) Smart city as a mobile technology: Critical perspectives on urban development policies. In: Rodríguez-BolívarMP (ed) Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities.
Amsterdam:
Springer, pp.147–161.
42.
MacLaranAKellyS (2014) Irish neoliberalism and neoliberal urban policy. In: MacLaranAKellyS (eds) Neoliberal Urban Policy and the Transformation of the City.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp.20–36.
MarchHRibera-FumazR (2016)
Smart contradictions: The politics of making Barcelona a self-sufficient city. European Urban and Regional Studies23(4): 816–830.
45.
MarchHRibera-FumazR (2018) Barcelona: From corporate smart city to technological sovereignty. In: Karvonen A, Cugurullo F and Caprotti F (eds) Inside Smart Cities: Place, Politics and Urban Innovation. London: Routledge, pp.229–243.
46.
MarshallTH (1950) Citizenship and Social Class.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
47.
McCannEWardK (2011) Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
48.
McCannEWardK (2013)
A multi-disciplinary approach to policy transfer research: Geographies, assemblages, mobilities and mutations. Policy Studies34(1): 2–18.
49.
McLarenDAgyemanJ (2015) Sharing Cities: A Case for Truly Smart and Sustainable Cities.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
50.
MorozovE (2013) To save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don’t Exist.
London:
Penguin.
51.
MouffeC (1999)
Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?Social Research66(3): 745–758.
52.
O’CallaghanCKellySBoyleMet al. (2015)
Topologies and topographies of Ireland’s neoliberal crisis. Space and Polity19(1): 31–46.
53.
OngA (2006)
Mutations in citizenship. Theory, Culture & Society23(2–3): 499–505.
54.
PeckJ (2012)
Austerity urbanism: American cities under extreme economy. City16(6): 626–655.
PeckJTheodoreNBrennerN (2013)
Neoliberal urbanism redux? Debates.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(3): 1091–1099.
57.
PerngS-YKitchinRMacDonnchaD (2018) Hackathons, entrepreneurship and the making of smart cities. Geoforum, pp. 1–9. Epub ahead of print September 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.024.
58.
PurcellM (2002)
Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal58(2): 99–108.
59.
RossiU (2017) Cities in Global Capitalism.
Chichester:
John Wiley & Sons.
60.
ShawJGrahamM (2017)
An informational right to the city? Code, content, control and the urbanization of information. Antipode49(4): 907–927.
61.
SheltonTLodatoT (2019) Actually existing smart citizens: Expertise and (non)participation in the making of the smart city. City. pp. 1–8. Epub ahead of print 5 February 2019. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2019.1575115.
Shelton T, Zook M and Wi
62.
SheltonTZookMWiigA (2015)
The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8(1): 13–25.
63.
SmithPSMcQuarrieM (eds) (2012) Remaking Urban Citizenship: Organizations, Institutions and the Right to the City. London: Routledge.
64.
SpringerS (2012)
Neoliberalism as discourse: Between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies9(2): 133–147.
65.
SwyngedouwE (2011)
Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography30(7): 370–380.
66.
SwyngedouwE (2016) The mirage of the sustainable ‘smart’ city. Planetary urbanization and the spectre of combined and uneven apocalypse. In: Nel-LoOMeleR (eds) Cities in the 21st Century.
London:
Routledge, pp.134–143.
67.
VanoloA (2014)
Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies51(5): 883–899.
68.
VanoloA (2016)
Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow’s smart cities. Futures82: 26–36.
69.
VanoloA (2018) Cities and the politics of gamification. Cities 74: 320–326.
70.
Ward K (2010) Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities. Progress in Human Geography 34(4): 471–487.
71.
WiigA (2016)
The empty rhetoric of the smart city: From digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia. Urban Geography37(4): 535–553.
