This article seeks to connect political geographic scholarship on institutions and policy more firmly to the experience of everyday life. Empirically, I foreground the ambiguous and indeterminate character of institutional decision-making and I underscore the need to closely consider the sensory texture of place and milieu in our analyses of it. My examples come from the study of diplomatic practice in Brussels, the capital of the European Union. Conceptually and methodologically, I use these examples to accentuate lived experience as an essential part of research, especially in the seemingly dry bureaucratic settings. I do so in particular through engaging with the work of Michel de Certeau, whose ideas enjoy considerable traction in cultural geography but are seldom used in political geography and policy studies. An accent on the texture and feel of policy practice necessarily highlights the role of place in that practice. This, in turn, may help us with communicating geographical research beyond our own discipline.
Adler-NissenR (2016)
Towards a practice turn in EU studies: The everyday of European integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies54(1): 87–103.
2.
AgnewJ (2007)
Know-where: Geographies of knowledge of world politics. International Political Sociology1(2): 138–148.
3.
AhearneJ (1995) Michel de Certeau: Interpretation and Its Other.
Palo Alto:
Stanford University Press.
4.
BachmannV (2016) European External Action: The Making of European Diplomacy in Kenya.
London:
Routledge.
5.
BarigazziJ (2015) Donald Tusk’s hard European education. Politico Europe, 22 October, 1, 11.
6.
BarryA (2013) Material Politics: Disputes along the Pipeline.
Chichester:
Wiley.
7.
BicchiFBrembergN (2016)
European diplomatic practices: Contemporary challenges and innovative approaches. European Security25(4): 391–406.
8.
BilloEMountzA (2015)
For institutional ethnography: Geographical approaches to institutions and the everyday. Progress in Human Geography40(2): 199–220.
9.
BoltanskiL (1987) The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
10.
BorgerJ (2013) How Iran nuclear deal was clinched to Johnny Cash's Ring of Fire. The Guardian, 25 November.
11.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
12.
BourdieuP (1996) The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
13.
BuegerCGadingerF (2015)
The play of international practice. International Studies Quarterly59: 449–460.
14.
CharbonneauLHafeziPMohammedA (2013) John Kerry says Iran talks far from over following nuclear deal. Huffington Post, 24 November.
15.
ConstantinouC (2015) Everyday diplomacy: Mission, spectacle and the remaking of diplomatic culture. In: DittmerJMcConnellF (eds) Diplomatic Cultures and International Politics: Translations, Spaces and Alternatives.
London:
Routledge, pp.23–40.
16.
ConstantinouC (2018)
Visual diplomacy: Reflections on diplomatic spectacle and cinematic thinking. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy13: 1–23.
17.
ConstantinouCCornagoNMcConnellF (2016)
Transprofessional diplomacy. Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy1(4): 1–66.
18.
CrangM (2000) Relics, places and unwritten geographies in the work of Michel de Certeau (1925–86). In: CrangMThriftN (eds) Thinking Space.
London:
Routledge, pp.136–158.
19.
D’AnconaM (2017) Sir Ivan Rogers’ sudden departure is a hit to Theresa May’s Brexit plans. The Guardian, 3 January.
20.
De CerteauM (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
21.
De CerteauMGiardMMayolP (1998) The Practice of Everyday Life. Vol. 2: Living and Cooking.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
22.
De la BaumeMVinocurN (2016) The last Sun King of French diplomacy. Politico Europe, 25 November.
23.
De WicquefortA (1681/1716) The Embassador and his Functions. Reprinted by the Centre for the Study of Diplomacy, Leicester: University of Leicester (1997).
24.
DittmerJ (2017) Diplomatic Material: Affect, Assemblage, and Foreign Policy.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
25.
DittmerJMcConnellF (eds) (2015) Diplomatic Cultures and International Politics: Translations, Spaces and Alternatives.
London:
Routledge.
26.
DowlingRLloydKSuchet-PearsonS (2016)
Qualitative methods 1: Enriching the interview. Progress in Human Geography40(5): 679–686.
27.
DriscollK (2001)
The moving ground: Locating everyday life. South Atlantic Quarterly100(2): 381–398.
28.
European Voice (2014) EV Insider (electronic newsletter), 7 June.
29.
FeldmanM (2009) Opera and Sovereignty: Transforming Myths in Eighteenth-Century Italy.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
30.
GeorgakakisD (2017) European Civil Service in (Times of) Crisis.
London:
Palgrave.
31.
GoldhammerA (1987) Translator’s introduction. In: BoltanskiL (ed) The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press, pp.xiii–xiv.
32.
IngoldT (2014)
That's enough about ethnography!HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory4 (1): 383–395.
33.
JeffreyA (2012) The Improvised State: Sovereignty, Performance and Agency in Dayton Bosnia.
Chichester:
Wiley-Blackwell.
34.
JohnsonHRobinsonJ (2013) The World Atlas of Wine. 7th ed.
London:
Mitchell Beazley.
35.
JonesAClarkJ (2015)
Mundane diplomacies for the practice of European geopolitics. Geoforum62: 1–12.
36.
KlapperRLeeM (2015) Food on floor, catnaps as diplomats sealed Iran nuclear deal. Talking Points Memo (news site), 4 April.
37.
KuusM (2014) Geopolitics and Expertise: Knowledge and Authority in European Diplomacy.
Chichester:
Wiley.
38.
KuusM (2015)
Transnational bureaucracies: How do we know what they know?Progress in Human Geography39(4): 432–448.
39.
KuusM (2018a)
Transnational bureaucratic fields: Positionality and generalization in the study of diplomacy. Political Geography. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.02.008
40.
KuusM (2018b)
Political economies of transnational fields: Harmonization and differentiation in European diplomacy. Territory, Politics, Governance6(2): 222–239.
41.
LaurensS (2017) Lobbyists and Bureaucrats in Brussels: Capitalism’s Brokers.
London:
Palgrave.
42.
MajdH (2013) Inching ahead on a deal with Iran. The New Yorker, 9 November.
43.
McConnellF (2016) Rehearsing the State: The Political Practices of the Tibetan Government-In-Exile.
Chichester:
Wiley.
44.
McConnellF (2017)
Liminal geopolitics: The subjectivity and spatiality of diplomacy at the margins. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42: 139–152.
45.
MitchellA (2015) Waltzing with Kerry in Vienna. Politico (news site), 30 June.
46.
MüllerM (2012)
Opening the black box of the organization: Socio-material practices of geopolitical ordering. Political Geography31: 379–388.
47.
NeumannIB (2012) At Home with the Diplomats: Inside a European Foreign Ministry.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
PouliotV (2016) International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
53.
PouliotVCornutJ (2015)
Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict50(3): 297–315.
54.
SayerAR (2001) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. 2nd ed.London, UK:
Routledge.
55.
ShimazuN (2014)
Diplomacy as theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955. Modern Asian Studies48(1): 225–252.
56.
SturdeeS (2016) Iran nuclear talks: The day the story died. AFP, 22 January.
57.
The Economist (2013) Anatomy of a failure, 9 March.
58.
The Economist (2014) Dance of the powers, 6 September.
59.
TomasikT (1998) Translator’s note. In: de CerteauMGiardLMayolP (eds) The Practice of Everyday Life. Vol. 2: Living and Cooking.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, pp.ix–xi.
60.
TomasikT (2001)
Certeau à la carte: Translating discursive terroir in the practice of everyday life: Living and cooking.The South Atlantic Quarterly100(2): 519–542.
61.
WedelJ (2017)
From power elites to influence elites: Resetting elite studies for the 21st century. Theory Culture and Society354(5–6): 153–178.
