This article examines the link between government decentralization and domestic terrorism in 65 countries over the period 1976–2009. The results show the existence of a U-shaped relationship between fiscal devolution and the number of domestic terror attacks. This implies that fiscal decentralization first contributes to reducing domestic terrorist activity. However, beyond a certain threshold level, the relationship becomes positive, indicating that the transfer of fiscal power to subnational governments increases the incidence of domestic terrorism. Furthermore, our findings also reveal that the number of domestic terror attacks is higher in those countries in which subnational governments are characterized by greater levels of political autonomy. These results are obtained after controlling for a number of factors that could plausibly be correlated with both the incidence of domestic terrorism and government decentralization, such as the level of economic development, country size, the extent of civil liberties and democracy, the degree of trade openness, or geographical features.
BahlRWLinnJF (1992) Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries, New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BeckTClarkeGGroffA (2001) New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review15(1): 165–176.
8.
BlombergSBHessGDWeerapanaA (2004) Economic conditions and terrorism. European Journal of Political Economy20(2): 463–478.
9.
BraithwaiteALiQ (2007) Transnational terrorism hot spots: Identification and impact evaluation. Conflict Management and Peace Science24(4): 281–296.
10.
BrancatiD (2006) Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism?International Organization60(3): 651–685.
11.
BrennanGBuchananJM (1980) The Power to Tax. Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BurgoonB (2006) On welfare and terror: Social welfare policies and political–economic roots of terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(2): 176–203.
13.
CameronACTrivediPK (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CamposNFGassebnerM (2013) International terrorism, domestic political instability, and the escalation effect. Economics and Politics25(1): 27–47.
15.
Canavire-Bacarreza G and Martinez-Vazquez J (2012) Reexamining the determinants of fiscal decentralization: What is the role of geography? Working Paper 12-11, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Atlanta, GA.
16.
ChoiSW (2010) Fighting terrorism through the rule of law?Journal of Conflict Resolution54(6): 940–966.
17.
ChuaA (2003) World On Fire. How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability, New York: Anchor Books.
18.
DavoodiHZouH (1998) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross country study. Journal of Urban Economics43(2): 244–257.
19.
DreherAFischerJAV (2010) Government decentralization as a disincentive for transnational terror? An empirical analysis. International Economic Review51(4): 981–1002.
20.
DreherAFischerJAV (2011) Does government decentralization reduce domestic terror? An empirical test. Economics Letters111(3): 223–225.
21.
DreherAGassebnerM (2008) Does political proximity to the U.S. cause terror?Economics Letters99(1): 27–29.
22.
DreherAGassebnerMSiemersLHR (2010) Does terrorism threaten human rights? Evidence from panel data. Journal of Law and Economics53(1): 65–93.
23.
DreherAKreibaumM (2016) Weapons of choice: The effect of natural resources on terror and insurgencies. Journal of Peace Research53(4): 539–553.
24.
DreherASturmJE (2012) Do the IMF and world bank influence voting in the UN general assembly?Public Choice151(1): 363–397.
25.
EndersWHooverGA (2012) The nonlinear relationship between terrorism and poverty. American Economic Review102(3): 267–272.
26.
EndersWSandlerT (1995) Terrorism theory and applications. In: HartleyKSandersT (eds) Handbook of Defense EconomicsVol 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 213–249.
27.
EndersWSandlerTGaibulloevK (2011) Domestic versus transnational terrorism: Data, decomposition, and dynamics. Journal of Peace Research48(3): 319–337.
28.
EndersWSandlerTPariseGF (1992) An econometric analysis of the impact of terrorism on tourism. Kyklos45(4): 531–554.
29.
EnikolopovRZhuravskayaE (2007) Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics91(11–12): 2261–2290.
30.
EstebanJMayoralLRayD (2012) Ethnicity and conflict: An empirical study. American Economic Review102(4): 1302–1342.
31.
EzcurraR (2015) Fiscal decentralization and internal conflict: An empirical investigation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy33(3): 580–600.
32.
EzcurraRPalaciosD (2016) Terrorism and spatial disparities: Does interregional inequality matter?European Journal of Political Economy42: 60–74.
33.
EzcurraRPascualP (2008) Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: Evidence from several European Union countries. Environment and Planning A40(5): 1185–1201.
34.
FearonJLaitinD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
35.
FismanRGattiR (2002) Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics83(3): 325–345.
36.
FreyBSLuechingerS (2003) How to fight terrorism: Alternatives to deterrence. Defence and Peace Economics14(4): 237–249.
37.
FreyBSLuechingerS (2004) Decentralization as a disincentive for terror. European Journal of Political Economy20(2): 509–515.
38.
FreytagAKrügerJMeierrieksD (2011) The origins of terrorism: Cross-country estimates on socio-economic determinants of terrorism. European Journal of Political Economy27(Suppl. 1): S5–S16.
39.
GassebnerMJong-A-PinRMierauJO (2008) Terrorism and electoral accountability: One strike, you're out!. Economics Letters100(1): 126–129.
40.
GassebnerMJong-A-PinRMierauJO (2011) Terrorism and cabinet duration. International Economic Review52(4): 1253–1270.
41.
GassebnerMLuechingerS (2011) Lock, stock, and barrel: A comprehensive assessment of the determinants of terror. Public Choice149(3): 235–261.
42.
GuimaraesP (2008) The fixed effects negative binomial model revisited. Economics Letters99(1): 63–66.
43.
HausmanJAHallBHGrilichesZ (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica52(4): 909–938.
44.
HechterM (2000) Containing Nationalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Heston A, Summers R and Aten B (2012) Penn world table version 7.1. Technical report, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.
46.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelAH (2016) Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of GovernanceVol 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
HorowitzDL (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
48.
Institute for Economics and Peace (2015) Global terrorism index 2015. Available at: www.economicsandpeace.org (accessed 16 August 2016).
49.
KemanH (2000) Federalism and policy performance. A conceptual and empirical inquiry. In: Wachendorfer-SchmidtU (ed.) Federalism and Political Performance, London: Routledge, pp. 196–227.
50.
Kis-KatosKLiebertHSchulzeGG (2011) On the origin of domestic and international terrorism. European Journal of Political Economy27(Suppl. 1): S17–S36.
51.
Kis-KatosKLiebertHSchulzeGG (2014) On the heterogeneity of terror. European Economic Review68: 116–136.
52.
KriegerTMeierrieksD (2011) What causes terrorism?Public Choice147(1–2): 3–27.
53.
Kurrild-KlitgaardPJustesenMKKlemmensenR (2006) The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism. Public Choice128(1–2): 289–315.
54.
KyriacouAP (2000) An ethnically based federal and bicameral system: The case of cyprus. International Review of Law and Economics20(2): 261–268.
55.
LaFreeGDuganL (2007) Introducing the global terrorism database. Terrorism and Political Violence19(2): 181–204.
56.
LaiB (2007) Draining the swamp: An empirical examination of the production of international terrorism, 1968–1998. Conflict Management and Peace Science24(4): 297–310.
57.
LetelierL (2005) Explaining fiscal decentralization. Public Finance Review33(2): 155–183.
58.
LiQ (2005) Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents?Journal of Conflict Resolution49(2): 278–297.
59.
LichbachMI (1987) Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution31(2): 266–297.
60.
LijphartA (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
61.
LongJ (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
62.
Martinez-VazquezJMcNabRM (2003) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development31(9): 1597–1616.
63.
Martinez-VazquezJTimofeevA (2009) A fiscal perspective of state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society2(1): 85–105.
64.
MerariA (1993) Terrorism as a strategy of insurgency. Terrorism and Political Violence5(4): 213–251.
65.
MontalvoJG (2011) Voting after the bombings: A natural experiment on the effect of terrorist attacks on democratic elections. Review of Economics and Statistics93(4): 1146–1154.
66.
NitschVSchumacherD (2004) Terrorism and international trade: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Political Economy20(2): 423–433.
67.
OatesW (1972) Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
68.
ObingerHLeibfriedSCastlesF (2005) Introduction. In: ObingerHLeibfriedSCastlesFG (eds) Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–50.
69.
PanizzaU (1999) On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics74(1): 97–139.
70.
PiazzaJA (2006) Rooted in poverty? Terrorism, poor economic development, and social cleavages. Terrorism and Political Violence18(1): 159–177.
71.
PiazzaJA (2008) Incubators of terror: Do failed and failing states promote transnational terrorism?International Studies Quarterly52(3): 469–488.
72.
Prud'homme R (1995) On the dangers of decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper 1252, World Bank, Washington DC.
73.
QianYWeingastB (1997) Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives11(4): 83–92.
74.
RobisonKKCrenshawEMJenkinsJC (2006) Ideologies of violence: The social origins of islamist and leftist transnational terrorism. Social Forces84(4): 2009–2026.
75.
Rodríguez-PoseAEzcurraR (2010) Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Economic Geography10(5): 619–644.
76.
Rodríguez-PoseAGillN (2003) The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21(3): 333–351.
77.
Rodríguez-PoseATijmstraSBwireA (2009) Fiscal decentralisation, efficiency, and growth. Environment and Planning A41(9): 2041–2062.
78.
RohnerDFreyBS (2007) Blood and ink! The common-interest-game between terrorists and the media. Public Choice133(1): 129–145.
79.
SambanisNMilanovicB (2014) Explaining regional autonomy differences in decentralized countries. Comparative Political Studies47(13): 1830–1855.
80.
START (2015) Global terrorism database [data file]. Technical report, National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START). Available at: http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd (accessed 11 August 2016).
81.
StegarescuD (2009) The effects of economic and political integration on fiscal decentralization: Evidence from OECD countries. Canadian Journal of Economics42(2): 694–718.
82.
TieboutCM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64(5): 416–424.
WeingastB (1995) The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic growth. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization11(1): 1–31.
85.
WooldridgeJM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86.
Zakaria F (2003) The arrogant empire. Newsweek, 23 March.
