Most of the empirical analysis explores the relationship between fiscal decentralization and economic growth within an institutional void. This paper investigates the connection between fiscal decentralization and economic growth in different institutional settings in 21 OECD countries over the period 1970–2010. We find that the pro-growth effects of fiscal decentralization depend critically on the authority of sub-national governments: tax decentralization leads to higher (lower) rates of economic growth when coupled with high (low) administrative and political decentralization. Tax decentralization is more conducive for growth if sub-national taxes accrue mostly from autonomous revenues such as property taxes. Overall, this provides evidence of institutional complementarities at work among decentralization dimensions leading to relevant insights for policy implications.
Acosta Ormaechea S and Yoo J (2012) Tax composition and growth: A broad cross-country perspective, IMF Working Paper No. 12/257.
2.
AhmadEBrosioG (2008) Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
3.
AmableB (2000) Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production. Review of International Political Economy7: 645–687.
4.
AlesinaASpolaoreE (2003) The Size of Nations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
AllisonPD (1977) Testing for interaction in multiple regression. American Journal of Sociology83(1): 144–153.
6.
AltunbaşYThorntonJ (2012) Fiscal decentralization and governance. Public Finance Review40(1): 66–85.
7.
Arellano M and Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 277–297.
8.
ArellanoMBoverO (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics68: 29–51.
9.
ArnoldJMBrysBHeadyC (2011) Tax policy for economic recovery and growth. The Economic Journal121: 59–80.
10.
ArzaghiMHendersonJV (2005) Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics89: 1157–1189.
11.
AsatryanZFeldLP (2015) Revisiting the link between growth and federalism: A Bayesian model averaging approach. Journal of Comparative Economics43(3): 772–781.
12.
BalliHOSørensenBE (2013) Interaction effects in econometrics. Empirical Economics45: 583–603.
13.
BarroRJSala-I-MartinX (2004) Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
BarroRJLeeJW (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics104: 184–198.
15.
Baskaran T, Feld LP and Schnellenbach J (2014) Fiscal federalism, decentralization and economic growth: Survey and meta-analysis, CESIFO Working Paper No. 4985.
16.
BesleyT (2007) Principled agents?: The political economy of good government. OUP Catalogue.
17.
BirdRM (1993) Threading the fiscal labyrinth: Some issues in fiscal decentralization. National Tax Journal46(2): 207–227.
18.
Blanchard O and Shleifer A (2001). Federalism With and Without Political Centralization: China Versus Russia. IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan Journals 48(4): 171–179.
19.
BleaneyMGemmellNKnellerR (2001) Testing the endogenous growth model: Public expenditure, taxation, and growth over the long run. Canadian Journal of Economics34(1): 36–57.
20.
BlöchligerH (2013) Decentralisation and economic growth—Part 1: How fiscal federalism affects long-term development. OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism14.
21.
Blöchliger H and Égert B (2013) Decentralisation and Economic Growth – Part 2: The Impact on Economic Activity, Productivity and Investment, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, No. 15, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4559gp7pzw-en.
22.
BlundellRBondS (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics87: 115–143.
23.
BodmanP (2011) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the OECD. Applied Economics43: 3021–3035.
24.
BondSHoefflerATempleJ (2001) GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Economics Papers 2001-W21, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
BruecknerJK (2006) Fiscal federalism and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics90: 2107–2120.
27.
CohenDSotoM (2007) Growth and human capital: Good data, good results. Journal of Economic Growth12: 51–76.
28.
DavoodiHZouH (1998) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. Journal of Urban Economics43: 244–257.
29.
De MelloL (2011) Does fiscal decentralisation strengthen social capital? Cross-country evidence and the experiences of Brazil and Indonesia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 281–296. DOI 10.1007/s11002-014-9339-5.
30.
(2014) The multicollinearity illusion in moderated regression analysis. In: DisatnikDSivanL (eds) Marketing Letters, 1–6.
31.
Ebel R and Yilmaz S (2003) On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. In J. Martinez-Vazquez and Alm J. (eds) Public finance in developing and transitional countries: Essays in honor of Richard Bird, pp. 101–126. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
32.
EnikolopovRZhuravskayaE (2007) Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics91: 2261–2290.
33.
EzcurraRRodríguez-PoseA (2012) Political decentralization, economic growth and regional disparities in the OECD. Regional Studies47(3): 1–14.
34.
FaguetJ-P (2012) Decentralization and Popular Democracy: Governance from below in Bolivia, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
35.
FeldLPSchnellenbachJ (2011) Fiscal federalism and long-run macroeconomic performance: A survey of recent research. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 224–243.
FoxJ (1996) How does civil society thicken? The political construction of social capital in rural Mexico. World Development24: 1089–1103.
38.
Fredriksen K (2013) Decentralisation and Economic Growth – Part 3: Decentralisation, Infrastructure Investment and Educational Performance, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, No. 16, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4559gg7wlw-en.
39.
FriedrichRJ (1982) In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science26(4): 797–833.
40.
GemmellNKnellerRSanzI (2013) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: Spending versus revenue decentralization. Economic Inquiry51: 1915–1931.
41.
HallPASoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
HanushekEAWoessmannL (2012) Schooling, educational achievement, and the Latin American growth puzzle. Journal of Development Economics99: 497–512.
43.
HayekF (1945) The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review35: 519–530.
44.
IvanynaMShahA (2011) Decentralization and corruption: New cross-country evidence. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 344–362.
45.
KnellerRBleaneyMFGemmellN (1999) Fiscal policy and growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics74: 171–190.
46.
KyriacouARoca-SagalésO (2011) Fiscal and political decentralization and government quality. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 204–223.
47.
Lago-PeñasILago-PeñasSMartinez-VazquezJ (2011) Guest editorial: The political and economic consequences of decentralization. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 197–203.
48.
LevineRReneltD (1992) A sensitivity Analysis of cross-country growth regressions. The American Economic Review82: 942–963.
49.
LiberatiPSacchiA (2013) Tax decentralization and local government size. Public Choice157: 183–205.
50.
LibmanA (2010) Constitutions, regulations, and taxes: Contradictions of different aspects of decentralization. Journal of Comparative Economics38: 395–418.
51.
LockwoodB (2006) The political economy of decentralization. Handbook of Fiscal Federalism Cheltenham, 33–60.
52.
MadariagaNPoncetS (2007) FDI in Chinese cities: Spillovers and impact on growth. The World Economy30: 837–862.
53.
MarksGHoogheLSchakelAH (2008) Measuring regional authority. Regional and Federal Studies18: 111–121.
54.
Martinez-VazquezJ (2008) Revenue assignments in the practice of fiscal decentralization. Fiscal Federalism and Political Decentralization: Lessons from Spain, Germany and Canada, 27.
55.
Martinez-VazquezJMcNabRM (2003) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development31: 1597–1616.
56.
McLureCE (1998) The revenue assignment problem: Ends, means and constraints. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting and Financial Management9: 652–683.
57.
Musgrave R (1983) Who should tax, there, and what. In: Tax Assignment in Federal Countries. Canberra, Australian National University.
58.
NorregaardJ (2013) Taxing immovable property. Revenue Potential and Implementation Challenges. IMF Working Paper N. 129. Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund.
59.
OatesWE (1972) Fiscal Federalism New York, Cheltenham: Harcourt Brace Jonanovitch.
60.
OECD (1999) Taxing Powers of State and Local Government. OECD Tax Policy Studies 1.
61.
OatesWE (2005) Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance12: 349–373.
62.
O’DwyerCZiblattD (2006) Does decentralisation make government more efficient and effective?Commonwealth & Comparative Politics44: 326–343.
63.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009) The Fiscal Autonomy of Sub-Central Governments: An Update. Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
64.
OECD (2010) Tax Policy Reform and Economic Growth, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
65.
OECD (2012) Reforming Fiscal Federalism and Local Government, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
66.
PanizzaU (1999) On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics74: 97–139.
67.
PresbiteroAFSacchiAZazzaroA (2014) Property tax and fiscal discipline in OECD countries. Economics Letters124: 428–433.
68.
Prud’HommeR (1995) The dangers of decentralization. The World Bank Research Observer10: 201–220.
69.
RikerWH (1964) Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance, Boston, MA: Little Brown.
70.
RoddenJ (2004) Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics36(4): 481–500.
71.
RoddenJA (2005) Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
Rodiguez-PoseAGillN (2003) The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21: 333–351.
73.
Rodriguez-PoseASandallR (2008) From identity to the economy: Analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26: 54–72.
74.
RondinelliDA (2008) Decentralization, territorial power and the state: A critical response. Development and Change21: 491–500.
75.
RoodmanD (2009a) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics71: 135–158.
76.
RoodmanD (2009b) How to do xtabond2: An introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in Stata. Stata Journal9: 86–136.
77.
SalmonP (2013) Decentralization and growth: What if the cross-jurisdiction approach had met a dead end?Constitutional Political Economy24: 87–107.
78.
SchneiderA (2003) Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development38: 32–56.
79.
SeabrightP (1996) Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review40: 61–89.
80.
SeligsonMA (2005) Can social capital be constructed? Decentralization and social capital formation in Latin America. Developing Cultures: Essays on Cultural Change, 361–377.
81.
ShahA (1998) Fiscal Federalism and Macroeconomic Governance: For Better or for Worse?, Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
82.
StegarescuD (2005) Public sector decentralisation: Measurement concepts and recent international trends. Fiscal Studies26: 301–333.
83.
StrumpfKSOberholzer-GeeF (2002) Endogenous policy decentralization: Testing the central tenet of economic federalism. Journal of Political Economy110: 1–36.
84.
ThiebenU (2003) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in high-income OECD countries. Fiscal Studies24: 237–274.
85.
ThorntonJ (2007) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered. Journal of Urban Economics61: 64–70.
86.
TieboutCM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64: 416–424.
87.
WeingastBR (2009) Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics65: 279–293.
88.
WoolcockMNarayanD (2000) Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer15: 225–249.
