Urban water sectors in industrialised countries are increasingly facing a diverse range of challenges. Aging assets, environmental concerns and economic issues put pressure on the current governance and organisation of these sectors. In recent years, a plethora of neoliberal reforms have been initiated in various countries as efforts to counteract these developments. While rather successful in infrastructure sectors, such as energy or telecommunication, neoliberal reforms have proven difficult in many industrialised, urban water sectors. The article argues that this is related to distinct characteristics of the water sectors. Specificities include large-scale technologies, high externalities and the nature of the good. This article analyses these key characteristics of urban water sectors and shows their implications and challenges for neoliberal reforms by drawing on the privatisation of the English water sectors. The results show key trade-offs between economic and environmental issues, and less with social goals.
AlloucheJLuis-MansoPFingerM (2007) Introduction liberalisation, privatisation and network industries: a similar path for water? In: FingerMAlloucheJLuis-MansoP (eds) Water and Liberalisation: European Water Scenarios, London: IWA, pp. 1–10.
2.
AraralE (2009) The failure of water utilities privatisation: Synthesis of evidence, analysis and implications. Policy and Society27: 221–228.
3.
AraralEWangY (2015) Does water governance matter to water sector performance? Evidence from ten provinces in China. Water Policy17(2): 268–282.
4.
AraralEWangY (2013) Water Governance 2.0: a review and second generation research agenda. Water Resources Management27(11): 3945–3957.
5.
AubinDVaroneF (2007) Chapter II policies regulating the water supply and sanitation sector in nine European countries. In: FingerMAlloucheJLuis-MansoP (eds) Water and Liberalisation: European Scenarios, London: IWA, pp. 34–53.
6.
BakkerK (2000) Privatising water, producing scarcity: The Yorkshire Drought of 1995. Economic Geography76(1): 4–27.
7.
BakkerK (2001) Paying for water: water pricing and equity in England and Wales. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers26(2): 143–164.
8.
BakkerK (2003) From public to private to… mutual? Restructuring water supply governance in England and Wales. Geoforum34: 359–374.
9.
BelGWarnerM (2008) Does privatisation of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling52: 1337–1348.
10.
BennettA (2004) Case study methods: Design, use, and comparative advantages. In: SprinzDWolinskyY (eds) Cases, Numbers, Models: International Relations Research Methods, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 27–64.
11.
CashmanAAshleyR (2008) Costing the long-term demand for water sector infrastructure. Foresight10(3): 9–26.
12.
ConsidineMLewisJ (2003) Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review63(2): 131–140.
13.
DasslerTParkerDSaalD (2006) Methods and trends of performance benchmarking in UK utility regulation. Utilities Policy14: 166–174.
14.
de la MotteR (2005) WaterTime case studies – Cardiff, UK and Leeds, UK, London: European Commission, pp. 1–47.
15.
Defra (2008) Future Water: The Government's Water Strategy for England, Norwich: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
16.
EspelandW (1998) The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality and Identity in the American Southwest, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
EversHBenedikterS (2009) Hydraulic bureaucracy in a modern hydraulic society – Strategic group formation in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Water Alternatives2(3): 416–439.
18.
Farsi M, Fetz A and Filippini M (2007) Economies of scale and scope in the Swiss multi-utilities sector. Centre for Energy Policy and Economics. CEPE Working Paper No. 59, Zurich Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology, pp.1–29.
19.
FingerMAlloucheJ (2002) Water Privatisation. Transnational Corporations and the Re-Regulation of the Water Industry, London: Francis and Taylor.
20.
Fitch M and Price H (2002) Water Poverty in England and Wales. Newcastle upon Tyne: Public Utilities Access Forum, the Centre for Utility Consumer Law and Chartered Institute of Environmental Health.
21.
FuenfschillingLTrufferB (2014) The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy43(4): 772–791.
22.
Fuenfschilling L (2014) A dynamic model of socio-technical change. Institutions, actors and technology in interaction. PhD thesis, University of Lucerne, Switzerland.
23.
GarciaSGuerin-SchneiderLBreuilL (2007) Chapter III analysis of the European Union explicit and implicit policies and approaches in the water supply and sanitation sectors. In: FingerMAlloucheJLuis-MansoP (eds) Water and Liberalisation: European Water Scenarios, London: IWA, pp. 54–81.
24.
GleickP (2012) The World's Water, USA: Island Press.
25.
GottliebR (1988) A Life of its Own. The Politics and Power of Water, USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
26.
GrahamSMarvinS (1994) Cherry picking and social dumping: Utilities in the 1990s. Utilities Policy4(2): 113–119.
27.
GrayAJenkinsB (1995) From public administration to public management: Reassessing a revolution?Public Administration73: 75–99.
28.
GrayD (2011) Review of Ofwat and consumer representation in the water sector, London: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs and Welsh Government.
29.
GuthrieG (2006) Regulatory Infrastructure: The impact on risk and investment. Journal of Economic Literature44(4): 925–972.
30.
HirstP (2000) Democracy and governance. In: PierreJ (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–35.
31.
KiparskyMSedlakDThompsonBH (2013) The innovation deficit in urban water: the need for an integrated perspective on institutions, organizations, and technology. Environmental Engineering Science30(8): 395–408.
32.
KuhlmannS (2008) Reforming local public services. Public Management Review10(5): 574–593.
33.
Lieberherr E (2012) Transformation of water governance and legitimacy: Comparing Swiss, German and English water supply and sanitation service providers. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
34.
Lieberherr E and Truffer B (2015) The impact of privatisation on sustainabilitytransitions: A comparative analysis of dynamic capabilities in three water utilities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 15: 101–122. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.12.002.
35.
Luis-MansoPFingerM (2009) Reforms in the urban water sector: A vulnerability analysis of the main elements at risk. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries2: 115–138.
36.
Luis-MansoPFingerMAlloucheJ (2007) Chapter IV analysis of the strategies of the water supply and sanitation operators in Europe. In: FingerMAlloucheJLuis-MansoP (eds) Water and Liberalisation: European Water Scenarios, London: IWA, pp. 82–103.
37.
MassaruttoALinaresEPaccagnanV (2007) Liberalisation and private sector involvement in WSS: the European experience. In: FingerMAlloucheJLuis-MansoP (eds) Water and Liberalisation: European Water Scenarios, London: IWA, pp. 196–216.
38.
MarkardJ (2011) Transformation of infrastructures: Sector characteristics and implications for fundamental change. Journal of Infrastructure Systems17(3): 107–117.
39.
MenardC (2009) From technical integrity to institutional coherence: regulatory challenges in the water sector. In: MenardCGhertmanM (eds) Regulation, Deregulation, Reregulation: Institutional Perspectives, Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 83–108.
40.
MolleFMollingaPPWesterP (2009) Hydraulic bureaucracies and the hydraulic mission: Flows of water, flows of power. Water Alternatives2(3): 328–349.
41.
OECD (2009) Managing Water for All: An OECD Perspective on Pricing and Financing, Paris: OECD Publishing.
42.
OECD (2011) Water Governance in OECD Countries: A multi-level approach. In: OECD Studies on Water. Paris: OECD Publishing.
43.
Ofwat (2009) Water Industry Facts and Figures, Birmingham: Office for Water Services.
44.
Ofwat (2010) Financial performance and expenditure of the water companies in England and Wales 2009–10. In: Ofwat Water Today, Water Tomorrow. Birmingham: Office for Water Services.
45.
Ofwat (2011) Financeability and financing the asset base. In: Water Today, Water Tomorrow. Birmingham: Office for Water Services.
46.
Pahl-WostlC (2015) Water Governance in the Face of Global Change. From Understanding to Transformation, London: Springer.
47.
Palaniappan M, Cooley H, Gleick PH, et al. (2007) Water infrastructure and water-related services: Trends and challenges affecting future development. In: OECD: Infrastructure to 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
48.
PerardE (2009) Water Supply: Public or private? An approach based on cost of funds, transaction costs, efficiency and political costs. Policy and Society27: 193–219.
49.
PetersonTKlauerBManstettenR (2009) The environment as a challenge for governmental responsibility – The case of the European Water Framework Directive. Ecological Economics68: 2058–2065.
50.
ProsserT (2005) The Limits of Competition Law: Markets and Public Services, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
RenzettiSDupontD (2004) The performance of municipal water utilities: Evidence on the role of ownership. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A67: 1861–1878.
52.
RogersPde SilvaRBhatiaR (2002) Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency and sustainability. Water Policy4: 1–17.
53.
RothenbergerDTrufferB (2004) The limits of production efficiency analysis: New institutional economics and PSP contracts. Greener Management International42: 21–34.
54.
RugemalilaRGibbsL (2015) Urban water governance failure and local strategies for overcoming water shortages in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy33: 412–427.
55.
SchoutenM (2009) Strategy and Performance of Water Supply and Sanitation Providers: Effects of Two Decades of Neo-liberalism, Leiden: CRC Press/Balkema.
56.
SchoutenMPieter van DijkM (2007) The European Water Supply and Sanitation Markets, London: IWA.
57.
ShaoulJ (1997) A critical financial analysis of the performance of privatised industry: the case of the UK water industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting8: 479–505.
58.
ShirleyM (2002) Thirsting for Efficiency: The Economics and Politics of Urban Water System Reform, Oxford: Elsevier.
59.
SwyngedouwEPageBKaikaM (2002) Sustainability and policy innovation in a multi-level context: Crosscutting issues in the water sector. In: HeineltHGetimisPKafkalasG (eds) Participatory Governance in Multi-Level Context: Concepts and Experience, Opladen: Leske and Budrich, pp. 107–129.
60.
TrufferBBinzCGebauerH (2012) Market success of on-site treatment: a systemic innovation problem. In: LarsenTUdertKLienertL (eds) Wastewater Treatment: Source Separation and Decentralisation, London: IWA Publishing, pp. 209–223.
61.
von WeizsackerEUYoungOFingerM (2005) Limits to Privatisation How to Avoid too Much of a Good Thing, London: Earthscan.
