Policies aimed at supporting small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are now standard in public procurement. Interest in these policies has yet to be matched by evidence on their implementation. Using an institutional perspective, we examine public buyers compliance with SME-friendly policy recommendations. The results, which are based on the self-reported behaviours of 436 respondents, show that public buyers are complying with some but not all policy measures. Compliance is high on measures including open tendering, provision of feedback and self-declaring financial capacity, but low on measures that impose higher transaction costs, such as dividing contracts into lots and encouraging consortium bidding. Further analysis reveals that involvement in procurement, policy familiarity and perceived importance of SME access act as positive predictors of compliance; being part of a semi-state/utility company, local authority or education institution has the opposite effect. Possibilities to increase compliance and bring about a more SME-friendly tendering system are discussed.
AnglundS (1999) “Policy feedback: the comparison effect and small business procurement policy”. Policy Studies Journal27: 11–27
2.
ArmstrongJ SOvertonT S (1977) “Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys”. Journal of Marketing Research14: 396–402
3.
ArrowsmithA (2010) “Horizontal policies in public procurement: a taxonomy”. Journal of Public Procurement10: 149–186
4.
BarleyS R (1986) “Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments”. Administrative Science Quarterly31: 78–108
5.
BennettR (2008) “SME policy support in Britain since the 1990s: what have we learnt?”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26: 375–397
6.
Bennett R, 2014, “A British SBA? What do other SBAs tell us about entrepreneurship and small business support successes and failures?”, paper for the ISBE Conference, Manchester 5–6 November; copy from R Bennett, University of Cambridge
7.
BergerPLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, New York: Irvington Publishers
8.
BeyerJStevensJHarrisonT (1983) “The implementing organization: exploring the black box in research on public policy”. In: HallRQuinnR (eds) Organisational Theory and Public Policy, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 227–243
9.
BovisC (1996) Public Procurement and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, London: Chartered Association of Certified Accountants
10.
BovisC (1998) “The regulation of public procurement as a key element of European economic Law”. European Law Journal4: 220–242
11.
CabrasI (2011) “Mapping the spatial patterns of public procurement: a case study from a peripheral local authority in northern England”. International Journal of Public Sector Management24: 187–205
12.
CaldwellNWalkerHHarlandCKnightLZhengJWakeleyT (2005) “Promoting competitive markets: the role of public procurement”. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management11: 242–251
13.
ClarkMMoutrayC (2004) “The future of small businesses in the U.S. federal Government marketplace”. Journal of Public Procurement4: 450–470
14.
CoggburnJRahmD (2005) “Environmentally preferable purchasing: who is doing what in the United States?”. Journal of Public Procurement5: 23–53
15.
D'aunnoTSuttonRPriceR (1991) “Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: a study of drug abuse treatment units”. Academy of Management Journal34: 636–661
16.
de BoerLTelgenJ (1998) “Purchasing practice in Dutch municipalities”. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management34: 31–37
DillmanD (2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
19.
Di MaggioP (1988) “Interest and agency in institutional theory”. In: ZuckerL (eds) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, MA: Ballinger, pp. 3–22
20.
DowlingJPfefferJ (1975) “Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behaviour”. The Pacific Sociological Review18: 122–136
21.
EIM (2011) Do SMEs Create More and Better Jobs?, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: EIM Business and Policy Research
22.
ErridgeA (2007) “Public procurement, public value and the Northern Ireland unemployment pilot project”. Public Administration85: 1023–1043
23.
European Commission (2008a) Small Business Act for Europe, Brussels: European Commission
24.
European Commission (2008b) European Code of Best Practices Facilitating Access by SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts, Brussels: European Commission
25.
European Commission (2013) Small Business Fact Sheet Ireland 2012/2013, Brussels: European Commission
26.
FeeRErridgeAHenniganS (2002) “SMEs and government purchasing in Northern Ireland”. European Business Review14: 326–334
27.
FlynnADavisPMcKevittDMcEvoyE (2012) “Sustainable public procurement in practice: case study evidence from Ireland”. In: AlbanoG LSniderK FThaiK V (eds) Charting a Course in Public Procurement Innovation and Knowledge Sharing, FL: PrAcademic Press, pp. 150–173
28.
FlynnADavisPMcKevittDMcEvoyE (2013) “Mapping public procurement in Ireland”. Public Procurement Law Review2: 74–95
29.
FlynnAMcKevittDDavisP (2015) “The impact of size on SME public sector tendering”. International Small Business Journal33: 443–461
30.
GeldermanC JGhijsenP WBrugmanJ (2006) “Public procurement and EU tendering directives – explaining non-compliance”. International Journal of Public Sector Management19: 702–714
31.
GHK (2010) Evaluation of SMEs' Access to Public Procurement Markets in the EU, Brussels: European Commission
32.
GilgA WKellyM P (1997) “The delivery of planning policy in Great Britain: explaining the implementation gap. New evidence from a case study in rural England”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy15: 19–36
33.
GloverA (2008) Accelerating the SME Economic Engine through Transparent, Simple and Strategic Procurement, London: HM Treasury
34.
GreerH (1999) Small Firms and Public Procurement in Ireland: A Study for the Department Of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, London: Network Resources Limited
35.
HM Government (2014) The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012: One Year On, London: Cabinet Office
36.
HsuAJohnsonL ALloydA (2013) Measuring Progress: A Practical Guide from the Developers of the Environmental Performance Index (EPI), New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy
37.
JeppersonR L (1991) “Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalism”. In: PowellW WDiMaggioP J (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 143–163
38.
JordanA (1999) “The implementation of EU environmental policy: a policy problem without a political solution?”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy17(1): 69–90
39.
KarjalainenKKemppainenK (2008) “The involvement of small and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement: impact of resource perceptions, electronic systems and enterprise size”. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management14: 230–240
40.
KarjalainenKKemppainenKvan RaaijE M (2009) “Non-compliant work behaviour in purchasing: an exploration of reasons behind maverick buying”. Journal of Business Ethics85: 245–261
41.
KidalovMSniderK (2011) “U.S. and European public procurement policies for small and medium sized enterprises (SME): a comparative perspective”. Business and Politics13: 1–41
42.
KrauseR M (2011) “Symbolic or substantive policy? Measuring the extent of local commitment to climate protection”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 46–62
43.
Labour Party (2013) An Enterprising Nation: The Final Report of the Small Business Taskforce, London: Labour Party
44.
LoaderK (2005) “Supporting SMEs through government purchasing activity”. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation6: 17–26
45.
LoaderK (2007) “The challenge of competitive procurement: value for money versus small business support”. Public Money and Management27: 307–314
46.
LoaderK (2013) “Is public procurement a successful small business policy support? A review of the evidence”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31: 39–55
47.
MacManusS (1991) “Why businesses are reluctant to sell to government”. Public Administration Review51: 328–344
48.
MartinSHartleyKCoxA (1999) “Public procurement directives in the European Union: a study of local authority purchasing”. Public Administration77: 387–406
49.
MasonC (2009) “Policy as a focus for small business research”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27: 191–194
50.
McCruddenC (2007) Buying Social Justice: Equality, Government, and Legal Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press
51.
McCueC PGianakisG A (2001) “Public purchasing: who's minding the store?”. Journal of Public Procurement1: 71–95
52.
MeyerJ (1979) “Organizational structure as signaling”. The Pacific Sociological Review22: 481–500
53.
MeyerJRowanB (1977) “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”. American Journal of Sociology83: 340–363
54.
MorganK (2008) “Greening the realm: sustainable food chains and the public plate”. Regional Studies42: 1237–1250
55.
MurrayG (2009) “Improving the validity of public procurement research”. International Journal of Public Sector Management22: 91–103
56.
MurrayG (2011) “Third sector commissioning and English local government procurement”. Public Money and Management31: 279–286
57.
MurrayG (2012) “Revolutionizing or recycling public procurement policy in the UK?”. Public Money and Management32(3): 165–167
58.
MwakibingaF ABuvikA (2013) “An empirical analysis of coercive means of enforcing compliance in public procurement”. Journal of Public Procurement13: 243–273
59.
National Institute of Government Purchasing (NIGP) (2001) NIGP Survey of Green Procurement Initiatives, VA, Herndon, Virginia: NIGP
60.
NilssonMEklundMTyskengS (2009) “Environmental integration and policy implementation: competing governance modes in waste management decision making”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27: 1–18
61.
OliverC (1991) “Strategic responses to institutional processes”. Academy of Management Review16: 145–179
62.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2013) Government at a Glance 2013: Procurement Data, Paris: OECD
63.
PickernellDKayAPackhamGMillerC (2011) “Competing agendas in public procurement: an empirical analysis of opportunities and limits in the UK for SMEs”. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy29: 641–658
64.
PittD (2010) “The impact of internal and external characteristics on the adoption of climate mitigation policies by US municipalities”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28: 851–871
65.
PreussL (2007) “Buying into our future: sustainability initiatives in local government procurement”. Business Strategy and the Environment16: 354–365
66.
PreussL (2011) “On the contribution of public procurement to entrepreneurship and small business policy”. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal23: 787–814
67.
PurchaseSGohTDooleyK (2009) “Supplier perceived value: differences between business-to-business and business-to-government relationships”. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management15: 3–11
68.
QiaoYThaiK VCummingsG (2009) “State and local procurement preferences: a survey”. Journal of Public Procurement9: 371–410
69.
RandhawaPMarshallF (2014) “Policy transformations and translations: lessons for sustainable water management in peri-urban Delhi, India”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32: 93–107
70.
RowanB (1982) “Organizational structure and the institutional environment: the case of public schools”. Administrative Science Quarterly27: 259–279
71.
SchapperPVeiga MaltaJGilbertD (2006) “An analytical framework for the management and reform of public procurement”. Journal of Public Procurement6: 1–26
72.
SmallboneDBaldockRBurgessS (2002) “Targeted support for high-growth start-ups: some policy issues”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20: 195–209
73.
SmithPHobbsA (2002) SMEs and Public Sector Procurement, London, UK: Shreeveport Management Consultancy
74.
SuchmanM (1995) “Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches”. Academy of Management Review20: 571–610
75.
ThomsonJJacksonT (2007) “Sustainable procurement in practice: lessons from local government”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management50: 421–444
76.
Van de VenA (1983) “Three Rs of administrative behaviour”. In: HallRQuinnR (eds) Organisational Theory and Public Policy, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 36–53
77.
VegaAChiassonMBrownD (2013) “Understanding the causes of informal and formal discretion in the delivery of enterprise policies: a multiple case study”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31: 102–118
78.
WalkerHBrammerS (2009) “Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector”. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal14: 128–137
79.
WilliamsN (2013) “Entrepreneurship and the role of policy”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31: 1–4
80.
WitheyJ (2011) “Small manufacturing businesses: their interest in securing contracts from public agencies”. Journal of Public Procurement11: 388–402
81.
WoldesenbetKRamMJonesT (2011) “Supplying large firms: the role of entrepreneurial and dynamic capabilities in small businesses”. International Small Business Journal30: 493–512
