This paper explores the ways in which European Union Regional Policy, particularly the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), operates in a multi-level governance framework in which stakeholders at sub-national, national and European levels work together in partnership to deliver the European funding. Focusing upon the case of the Highlands and Islands region of Scotland, the paper analyses the ways in which partnership and governance structures have evolved over successive ERDF programming periods between 2000–2006 and 2007–2013. In particular, the paper illustrates the ways in which the Highlands and Islands’ ERDF governance structures were built upon a ‘broad’ and ‘deep’ level of partnership amongst key stakeholders, especially in the 2000–2006 programme. For various reasons, including a significant reduction in its ERDF funding allocation, the level of partnership working was streamlined during the 2007–2013 programme. Importantly, however, the durability of the governance structures has been maintained.
Adshead M, 2013, “EU cohesion policy and multi-level governance outcomes in Ireland: how sustainable is Europeanization?” European Urban and Regional Studies published online 3 July 2013
2.
AllenD (1996) “Cohesion and structural adjustment”. In: WallaceHWallaceW (eds) Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–233
3.
ArmstrongHGiordanoBKizosTMacleodCSmed OlsenLSpilanisS (2012) “The European Regional Development Fund and Island Regions: an evaluation of the 2000-06 and 2007-13 programs”. Island Studies Journal7: 177–198
4.
Bache I, 1998, The Politics of European Union Regional Policy: Multi-Level Governance or Flexible Gatekeeping? Contemporary European Studies Series (UACES/Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield)
5.
BacheI (2008) Europeanization and Multi-level Governance: Cohesion Policy in the European Union and Britain, Lanham (US) and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield
6.
BacheI (2010) “Partnership as an EU policy instrument: a political history”. West European Politics33: 58–74
7.
BacheIFlandersM (2004) Multi-level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press
8.
BachtlerJMcMasterI (2008) “EU Cohesion Policy and the role of the regions: investigating the influence of Structural Funds in the new member states”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26: 398–427
9.
BachtlerJTurokI (1997) The Coherence of EU Regional Policy, London: Jessica Kingsley
10.
BährC (2008) “How does sub-national autonomy affect the effectiveness of structural funds?”. Kyklos61: 3–18
11.
Barca F, 2009, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent Report, prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, Brussels, Belgium
12.
BatterburyS (2006) “Principles and purposes of European Union Cohesion policy evaluation”. Regional Studies40: 179–188
13.
BauerM (2002) “The EU ‘partnership principle’ revisited: a critical appraisal of its integrationist potential as a governance device interconnecting multiple administrative arenas”. Public Administration80: 769–789
14.
BenzAEeberleinB (1999) “The Europeanization of regional policies: patterns of multi-level governance”. Journal of European Public Policy6: 329–348
15.
Blake Stevenson, 2011, “European Structural Funds Programmes in Scotland (2007-2013): Evaluation of the Contribution of European Structural Funds to Community Planning Partnerships”, Report to the Scottish Government, Edinburgh
16.
BöhmeKWaterhoutB (2007) “The Europeanization of planning”. In: CarbonellAFaludiA (eds) Gathering the Evidence – The Way Forward for European Planning?, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 1–27
17.
BörzelTRisseT (2003) “Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe”. In: FeatherstoneKRadaelliC (eds) The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–82
18.
BristowGBlewittN (2001) “The Structural Funds and additionality in Wales: devolution and multilevel governance”. Environment and Planning A33: 1083–1099
19.
Comhairle nan Eilean Siar, 2003, Western Isles Structure Plan 2003, Stornoway
Comhairle nan Eilean Siar, 2008, Western Isles Local Plan 2008, Stornoway
22.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1989) Guide to the Reform of the Community's Structural Funds, Brussels: CEC
23.
Copus A, 1999, A New Peripherality Index for the NUTSIII Regions of the European Union, ERDF Study 98/00/27/130, Aberdeen and Brussels
24.
Chardas A, 2012, “Multi-level governance and the application of the partnership principle in times of economic crisis in Greece” Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe56
25.
DąbrowskiM (2012) “Shallow or deep Europeanisation? The uneven impact of EU cohesion policy on the regional and local authorities in Poland”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30: 730–745
26.
Danson M W, Fairley J, Lloyd M G, Turok I, 1999, “The European Structural Funds Partnerships in Scotland: new forms of governance for regional developments?” Scottish Affairs Spring 27
27.
DansonMDe SouzaP (2012) Regional Development in Northern Europe Peripherality, Marginality and Border Issues, Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge
28.
Davies S, Bachtler J, Gross F, Michie R, Vironen H, Yuill D, 2007, “The Impact of Structural Funds Programmes in Scotland 1994-2006” European Policy Research Paper, 60 European Policies Research Centre, July
29.
EC, 2009, “Sixth progress report on economic and social cohesion - Creative and innovative regions” European Commission COM (2009) 295, 25 June 2009
30.
EC, 2010, Investing in Europe's Future: 5th Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion, Publications Office of the European Union, DOI: 10.2776/29620 (European Commission, Luxembourg)
31.
EC, 2013 Europe 2020: Europe's Growth Strategy, Publications Office of the European Union, DOI: 10.2775/39976, (European Commission, Luxembourg)
32.
EmberyJ (2004) “A theoretical evaluation of the validity of Objective 1 funding in the Western Isles economy”. International Journal of Applied Management4: 100–112
33.
EvansR (2002) “The Merseyside Objective One Programme: exemplar of coherent city-regional planning and governance or cautionary tale?”. European Planning Studies10: 495–517
34.
FaroleTRodríguez-PoseAStorperM (2011) “Cohesion policy in the European Union: growth, geography, institutions”. Journal of Common Market Studies49: 1089–1111
35.
FitjarR DLeknesEThygesenJ (2013) “Europeanisation of regional policy making: a Boolean analysis of Norwegian counties' participation in the EU's Interreg programme”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31: 381–400
36.
Fraser Associates, 2003, “Mid-Term Evaluation of the Highlands and Islands Special Transitional Programme: Main Report (Final)”, Report for Scottish Executive, Edinburgh
37.
GilCPascualPRapúnM (2002) “Regional allocation of Structural Funds in the European Union”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20: 655–677
38.
GrahamBHartM (1999) “Cohesion and diversity in the European Union: irreconcilable forces?”. Regional Studies33: 259–268
39.
GrazianoPVinkM P (2007) Europeanization: New Research Agendas, Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan
40.
GripaiosPBishopPHartTMcVittieE (2008) “Analysing the impact of Objective 1 funding in Europe: a review”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26: 499–524
41.
HallR (2005) “The future of European Regional Policy: issues surrounding an agenda for a growing Europe”. Regional Studies39: 966–971
42.
Hall Aitken, 2007, Outer Hebrides Migration Study: Final Report, Study for Comhairle nan Eilean Siar, (Western Isles Enterprise and Communities Scotland, Stornoway)
43.
HanfKO'TooleLJJr (1992) “Revisiting old friends: networks, implementation structures and the management of inter-organizational relations”. European Journal of Political Research22: 163–180
44.
HjernBHullC (1982) “Implementation research as empirical constitutionalism”. European Journal of Political Research10: 105–115
45.
HjernBPorterD (1981) “Implementation structures: a new unit of administrative analysis”. Organization Studies2: 211–227
46.
HoogheL (1996) Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press
47.
HoogheLMarksG (1995) “Channels of subnational representations in the European Union”. In: DehousseRChristiansenT (eds) What Model for the Committee of the Regions? Past Experiences and Future Perspectives, Florence: European University Institute, pp. 6–33
48.
HoogheLMarksG (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration, London: Rowman and Littlefield
49.
HoogheLMarksG (2003) “Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance”. American Political Science Review97: 233–243
50.
Hope S, Murray L, Martin C, 2004, “In-migration to the Highlands and Islands”, Study by NFO Social Research for Highlands and Islands Enterprise, Edinburgh
51.
JeffreyC (2000) “Sub-National Mobilization and European Integration: Does it make any difference?”. Journal of Common Market Studies1(38): 1–23
52.
KingA (1975) “Overload: problems of Governing in the 1970s”. Political Studies23: 284–296
53.
KnillC (1998) “European policies: the impact of national administrative traditions”. Journal of Public Policy18: 1–28
54.
KyriacouA PRoca-SagalésO (2012) “The impact of EU structural funds on regional disparities within member states”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30: 267–281
55.
Monfort P, 2009, “Territories with specific geographical features, Series of short term papers on regional research and indicators”, European Union Working Paper 2, Directorate General for Regional Policy, European Commission
56.
MolleW (2008) European Cohesion Policy, Milton Park: Routledge
57.
OECD (2009) Regions Matter: Economic Recovery, Innovation and Sustainable Growth, Paris: OECD
58.
PercocoMGioveM (2009) “Multilevel governance at work: evidence from Structural Funds management in Lombardia”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27: 381–398
59.
Roberts D, 2005, The Western Isles Regional Accounts 2003, Study for Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Enterprise and Communities Scotland, Stornoway)
60.
RoseNMillerP (1992) “Political power beyond the state: problematics of government”. The British Journal of Sociology43: 173–205
61.
Scottish Executive (2005) Mid-Term Evaluation Update: Highlands and Islands Special Transitional Programme, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive
62.
Scottish Government (2009a) Scottish Sea Fisheries Statistics, 2009, Edinburgh: National Statistics for Scotland
63.
Scottish Government, 2009b, Scottish Fish Farm Production Survey 2009 Report (Scottish Government, Edinburgh)
Snedden Economics, 2007, “Outer Hebrides tourism facts and figures update”, Report for HIE Innse Gall, VisitScotland (Outer Hebrides) and Comhairle nan Eilean Siar, Stornoway
66.
Spilanis I, Giordano B, Thanasis K, 2014, “The effectiveness of European Regional Development Fund projects in Greece: views from planners, management staff and beneficiaries” European Urban and Regional Studies (forthcoming)
67.
StokerG (1998) “Governance as theory: five propositions”. International Social Science Journal9: 17–28
68.
SutcliffeJ B (2002) “Subnational influence on the structural funds: the case of the Highlands and Islands of Scotland”. Regional & Federal Studies12: 102–127
69.
Taylor WA, Bryden DB, Westbrook SR, Anderson S, 2010, “Nature based tourism in the outer Hebrides”, Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 353 (Tender 29007), Stornoway
70.
TömmelI (1997) “The EU and the regions: towards a three-tier system or new modes of regulation?”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy15: 413–436
71.
Tyler P, 2010, “Task 2 country report on achievement of cohesion policy: United Kingdom”, Expert Evaluation Network Delivering Policy Analysis on the Performance of Cohesion Policy 2007-13; November 2010 DG Regional Policy, European Commission
