Research frequently contends that support for democracy is a comparatively stable attitude. A previously neglected explanation for this finding is that regime preferences rest on deeply rooted psychological foundations. This article develops theoretical arguments about how the big five personality traits relate to democratic regime preferences in consolidated democracies, and presents empirical evidence using original survey data for six Western European countries. The results show that democratic regime support is substantively higher for more open, conscientious and agreeable individuals, but slightly lower for more extraverted and neurotic individuals. In addition, it highlights that it is important not to conflate support for democracy with authoritarianism, which the previous literature has frequently turned to for personality roots of anti-democratic sentiments. While authoritarianism also goes along with lower openness to experience, conscientiousness displays an opposite relationship, increasing pro-democratic attitudes but also individuals’ levels of authoritarianism. Thus, findings on authoritarianism should not be automatically translated to regime preferences.
AckermannKAckermannM (2015) The Big Five in context: Personality, diversity and attitudes toward equal opportunities for immigrants in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review21(3): 396–418.
3.
AdornoTWFrenkel-BrunswikELevinsonDJSanfordRN (1950) The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.
4.
AlbertusMGrossmanG (2021) The Americas: When do voters support power grabs?Journal of Democracy32(2): 116–131.
5.
AltemeyerB (1981) Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
6.
AltemeyerB (1996) The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Armendáriz MirandaP (2022) Explaining autocratic support: The varying effects of threat on personality. Political Psychology43(6): 993–1007.
8.
Armendáriz MirandaPCawveyM (2021) Introverted and closed-minded: The psychological roots of support for autocracy in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America13(1): 40–66.
9.
BakkerBN (2017) Personality traits, income, and economic ideology. Political Psychology38(6): 1025–1041.
10.
BeierleinCAsbrockFKauffMSchmidtP (2015) Kurzskala Autoritarismus (KSA-3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.6102/zis228 (accessed 20 May 2022).
11.
BermeoN (2016) On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy27(1): 5–19.
12.
BrandstätterHOppK-D (2014) Personality traits (‘Big Five’)and the propensity to political protest: Alternative models. Political Psychology35(4): 515–537.
13.
BrommeLRothmundTAzevedoF (2022) Mapping political trust and involvement in the personality space – A meta-analysis and new evidence. Journal of Personality90(6): 846–872.
14.
ClaassenC (2020) Does public support help democracy survive?American Journal of Political Science64(1): 118–134.
15.
ClaassenCMagalhãesPC (2022) Effective government and evaluations of democracy. Comparative Political Studies55(5): 869–894.
16.
CorderoGSimónP (2016) Economic crisis and support for democracy in Europe. West European Politics39(2): 305–325.
CurtisKANielsenJH (2020) Personality’s cross-national impact across EU attitude dimensions. Research & Politics7(4): 205316802097281.
19.
DahlRA (1998) On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
DaltonRJ (1994) Communists and democrats: Democratic attitudes in the two Germanies. British Journal of Political Science24(4): 469–493.
21.
DinesenPTKlemmensenRNørgaardAS (2016) Attitudes toward immigration: The role of personal predispositions. Political Psychology37(1): 55–72.
22.
DinesenPTNørgaardASKlemmensenR (2014) The civic personality: Personality and democratic citizenship. Political Studies62(1_suppl): 134–152.
23.
DuckittJBizumicB (2013) Multidimensionality of Right-Wing Authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology34(6): 841–862.
24.
EastonD (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
25.
ErhardtJFreitagMFilsingerM (2023) Leaving democracy? Pandemic threat, emotional accounts and regime support in comparative perspective. West European Politics46(3): 477–499.
26.
ErhardtJWamslerSFreitagM (2021) National identity between democracy and autocracy: A comparative analysis of 24 countries. European Political Science Review13(1): 59–76.
27.
FatkeM (2017) Personality traits and political ideology: A first global assessment. Political Psychology38(5): 881–899.
28.
FatkeM (2019) The personality of populists: How the Big Five traits relate to populist attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences139: 138–151.
29.
FreitagM (2017) Die Psyche des Politischen: Was der Charakter über unser politisches Denken und Handeln verrät. Zürich: NZZ Libro.
30.
FreitagMHofstetterN (2021) Pandemic personality: Emotional reactions, political and social preferences across personality traits in times of Corona. Current Psychology. Epub ahead of print 23 November. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02493-x.
31.
FreitagMZumbrunnA (2022) Direct democracy, personality, and political interest in comparative perspective. Politics. Epub ahead of print 25 February. DOI: 10.1177/02633957221074897.
32.
GallegoAPardos-PradoS (2014) The Big Five personality traits and attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies40(1): 79–99.
33.
GeddesBWrightJFrantzE (2014) Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics12(2): 313–331.
34.
GerberASHuberGADohertyDDowlingCMHaSE (2010) Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review104(1): 111–133.
35.
GerberASHuberGADohertyDDowlingCM (2011) The Big Five Personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science14(1): 265–287.
36.
GoslingSDRentfrowPJSwannWB (2003) A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality37(6): 504–528.
37.
HeavenPCLBucciS (2001) Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality15(1): 49–56.
38.
HuangMChangYChuY (2008) Identifying sources of democratic legitimacy: A multilevel analysis. Electoral Studies27(1): 45–62.
39.
InglehartR (2003) How solid is mass support for democracy – And how can we measure it?PS: Political Science and Politics36(1): 51–57.
40.
IserJSchmittP (2005) Werte und Big-Five: Trennbarkeit der Konzepte und Erklärungskraft für politische Orientierungen. In: SchumannS (ed.) Persönlichkeit: Eine vergessene Größe der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp.301–320.
41.
JohnOPNaumannLPSotoCJ (2008) Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In: JohnOPRobinsRWPervinLA (eds) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford Press, pp.114–158.
42.
KleinM (2005) Persönlichkeitseigenschaften und Postmaterialismus. In: SchumannS (ed.) Persönlichkeit: Eine vergessene Größe der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp.266–277.
43.
KönigPDSiewertMBAckermannK (2022) Conceptualizing and measuring citizens’ preferences for democracy: Taking stock of three decades of research in a fragmented field. Comparative Political Studies55(12): 2015–2049. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211066213
44.
LinzJJStepanA (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45.
LührmannATannenbergMLindbergSI (2018) Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics and Governance6(1): 60–77.
46.
McCraeRRCostaPT (2008) The five-factor theory of personality. In: JohnOPRobinsRWPervinLA (eds) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford Press, pp.159–181.
47.
MagalhãesPC (2014) Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research53(1): 77–97.
48.
MattesRBrattonM (2007) Learning about democracy in Africa: Awareness, performance, and experience. American Journal of Political Science51(1): 192–217.
49.
MerkelW (2010) Systemtransformation: Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
50.
MondakJJ (2010) Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
MondakJJHalperinKD (2008) A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science38(2): 335–362.
52.
NicolAAde FranceK (2016) The Big Five’s relation with the facets of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences98: 320–323.
53.
Nur-teginKCzapHJ (2012) Corruption: Democracy, autocracy, and political stability. Economic Analysis and Policy42(1): 51–66.
54.
PerryRSibleyCG (2012) Big-Five personality prospectively predicts Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences52(1): 3–8.
55.
PettigrewTF (2016) In pursuit of three theories: Authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology67: 1–21.
56.
PutnamRD (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
RodeMGwartneyJD (2012) Does democratization facilitate economic liberalization?European Journal of Political Economy28(4): 607–619.
58.
Sanchez-RoigeSGrayJCMacKillopJChenC-HPalmerAA (2018) The genetics of human personality. Genes, Brain, and Behavior17(3): e12439.
59.
SchoenHSchumannS (2007) Personality traits, partisan attitudes, and voting behavior. Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology28(4): 471–498.
60.
SibleyCGOsborneDDuckittJ (2012) Personality and political orientation: Meta-analysis and test of a threat-constraint model. Journal of Research in Personality46(6): 664–677.
61.
TorcalMMagalhãesPC (2022) Ideological extremism, perceived party system polarization, and support for democracy. European Political Science Review14(2): 188–205.
62.
VerhulstBEavesLJHatemiPK (2012) Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science56(1): 34–51.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
