Are European Parliament (EP) elections used to pass judgement on the legislative behaviour of parties serving in the EP? Do Europeans give a bonus in EP elections to political parties whose members were highly active during the legislative term? The article will focus on the role of legislative activities in the eighth EP term (2014–2019) in informing the 2019 vote choice. The analysis combines the European Election Studies (EESs) 2019 Voter Study data with original legislative behaviour data, as well as with data on European electoral systems. The evidence points to productivity-based retrospective voting being a feature of the 2019 elections. Furthermore, the analysis finds that this type of retrospective voting is stronger in countries where electoral rules encourage candidates to promote past legislative records in electoral campaigns, and particularly so for voters that paid attention to the EP campaign in such systems. This has significant implications for the retrospective voting and EU elections literatures, since it is evidence that the very demanding democratic desiderata of retrospection can be met in multi-level and supranational contexts as well.
BartelsL (2008) Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BartelsLM (2002) Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior24(2): 117–150.
5.
BerryCRHowellWG (2007) Accountability and local elections: Rethinking retrospective voting. The Journal of Politics69(3): 844–858.
6.
BesleyT (2006) Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BisgaardM (2015) Bias will find a way: Economic perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. The Journal of Politics77(3): 849–860.
8.
BoomgaardenHGDe VreeseCHSchuckARTAzroutRElenbaasM (2013) Across time and space: Explaining variation in news coverage of the European Union. European Journal of Political Research52(5): 608–629.
9.
BowlerS (2010) Private members’ bills in the UK parliament: Is there an ‘electoral connection’?The Journal of Legislative Studies16(4): 476–494.
10.
BräuningerTBrunnerMDäublerT (2012) Personal vote-seeking in flexible list systems: How electoral incentives shape Belgian MPs’ bill initiation behaviour. European Journal of Political Research51(5): 607–645.
11.
CareyJMShugartMS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
12.
DäublerTHixS (2018) Ballot structure, list flexibility and policy representation. Journal of European Public Policy25(12): 1798–1816.
13.
DäublerTBräuningerTBrunnerM (2016) Is personal vote-seeking behavior effective?Legislative Studies Quarterly41(2): 419–444.
14.
DäublerTChristensenLLinekL (2018) Parliamentary activity, re-selection and the personal vote. Evidence from flexible-list systems. Parliamentary Affairs71(4): 930–949.
15.
De VriesCETillmanER (2011) European Union issue voting in East and West Europe: The role of political context. Comparative European Politics9(1): 1–17.
16.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Addison Wesley.
17.
EdwardsAde KoolDVan OoijenC (2015) The information ecology of parliamentary monitoring websites: Pathways towards strengthening democracy. Information Polity20(4): 253–268.
18.
EnnsPKKellstedtPMMcAvoyGE (2012) The consequences of partisanship in economic perceptions. Public Opinion Quarterly76(2): 287–310.
19.
EvansGAndersenR (2006) The political conditioning of economic perceptions. The Journal of Politics68(1): 194–207.
20.
EvansGPickupM (2010) Reversing the causal arrow: The political conditioning of economic perceptions in the 2000–2004 U.S. presidential election cycle. The Journal of Politics72(4): 1236–1251.
21.
FarrellDMShugartMS (2012) Electoral Systems. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
22.
FerejohnJA (1986) Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice50(1): 5–25.
23.
FerraraFWeishauptJT (2004) Get your act together: Party performance in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics5(3): 283–306.
24.
FerrazCFinanF (2008) Exposing corrupt politicians: The effects of Brazil’s publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics123(2): 703–745.
25.
FiorinaMP (1978) Economic retrospective voting in American national elections: A micro-analysis. American Journal of Political Science22(2): 426–443.
26.
FiorinaMP (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
FrançoisANavarroJ (2019) Voters reward hard-working MPs: Empirical evidence from the French legislative elections. European Political Science Review11(4): 469–483.
28.
FrançoisANavarroJ (2020) Voters’ knowledge of their representatives: The direct and conditioned effects of parliamentary work. Swiss Political Science Review26(1): 96–124.
29.
FrechE (2016) Re-electing MEPs: The factors determining re-election probabilities. European Union Politics17(1): 69–90.
30.
GrierKBMungerMC (1986) The impact of legislator attributes on interest-group campaign contributions. Journal of Labor Research7(4): 349–361.
31.
HealyAMalhotraN (2013) Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Reviews of Political Science16(1): 285–306.
32.
HermansenSSL (2018) Striving for influence: The effect of performance on candidate selection. Party Politics24(4): 382–396.
33.
HixSHagemannS (2009) The missing electoral link in EU politics. Politique Europeenne2(28): 37–52.
34.
HixSMarshM (2010) Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of European parliament elections across time. Electoral Studies30(1): 4–15.
35.
HoboltSBDe VriesC (2016) Turning against the Union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies44(1): 504–514.
36.
HoboltSBHøylandB (2011) Selection and sanctioning in European parliamentary elections. British Journal of Political Science41(3): 477–498.
37.
HoboltSBSpoonJJTilleyJ (2009) A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 93–115.
38.
KellermannM (2013) Sponsoring early day motions in the British house of commons as a response to electoral vulnerability. Political Science Research and Methods1(2): 263–280.
39.
KeyVO (1966) The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
KousserT (2004) Retrospective voting and strategic behavior in European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies23(1): 1–21.
41.
KramerGH (1971) Short-term fluctuations in US voting behavior, 1896–1964. American Political Science Review65(1): 131–143.
42.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2000) Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science3(1): 183–219.
43.
LoewenPJKoopRSettleJFowlerJH (2014) A natural experiment in proposal power and electoral success. American Journal of Political Science58(1): 189–196.
44.
McDermottMLJonesDR (2003) Do public evaluations of congress matter? Retrospective voting in congressional elections. American Politics Research31(2): 155–177.
45.
McElroyGBenoitK (2010) Party policy and group affiliation in the European parliament. British Journal of Political Science40(2): 377–398.
46.
MarangoniFRussoF (2018) Not all roads lead to Rome: The conditional effect of legislative activity on reselection prospects in Italy. Parliamentary Affairs71(4): 888–907.
47.
MarshMMikhaylovS (2010) European parliament elections and EU governance. Living Reviews in European Governance5(1): 4.
48.
MayhewDR (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection (2 OP -19 ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
OkolikjMQuinlanS (2016) Context matters: Economic voting in the 2009 and 2014 European parliament elections. Politics and Governance4(1): 145–166.
50.
PappZRussoF (2018) Parliamentary work, re-selection and re-election: In search of the accountability link. Parliamentary Affairs71(4): 853–867.
51.
PayneJL (1980) Show horses and work horses in the United States house of representatives. Polity12(3): 428–456.
52.
ProkschSOSlapinJB (2012) Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech. American Journal of Political Science56(3): 520–537.
53.
ProkschSOSlapinJB (2015) The Politics of Parliamentary Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European elections results. European Journal of Political Research3(2): 3–44.
SoraceMHoboltSB (2020) A tale of two peoples: Motivated reasoning in the aftermath of the Brexit vote. Political Science Research and Methods2020(4): 1–18.
57.
TilleyJHoboltSB (2011) Is the government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility. The Journal of Politics73(2): 316–330.
58.
TilleyJGarryJBoldT (2008) Perceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research47(5): 665–686.
59.
Van der EijkCVan der BrugWKrohMFranklinM (2006) Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: On the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies25(3): 424–447.
60.
Van ThommeJRingeNVictorJN (2015) Explaining reelection in the European elections 2014: Expertise, influence, and intergroups. In: KaedingMSwitekN (eds) Die Europawahl 2014. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp.335–344.
61.
YoshinakaAMcElroyGBowlerS (2010) The appointment of rapporteurs in the European parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly35(4): 457–486.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
