Othering as soft-power discursive practice: China Daily’s construction of Trump’s America in the 2016 presidential election

Abstract

The relationship between Chinese soft power and Chinese media has been a focus of a growing body of literature. Challenging a resource-based conception of soft power and a transmission view of communication that inform much of the debate, this article adopts a discursive approach to soft power and media communication. It argues that their relationship is not just a matter of resource transmission, but one of discursive construction, which begs the questions of what mediated discursive practices are at play in soft power construction and how. Addressing these oft-neglected questions, we identify a typology of three soft-power discursive practices: charm offensive, Othering offensive, and defensive denial. Focusing on the little-understood practice of Othering offensive, we illustrate its presence in Chinese media through a critical discourse analysis of China Daily’s framing of Donald Trump and the United States, and argue that the Othering offensive in Chinese media that portrays Trump’s America as a dysfunctional and declining Other serves to construct a Chinese self as more responsible, dynamic, and attractive. Adding a missing discursive dimension to the study of soft power and the media, this study has both scholarly and practical implications for analysing a nation’s soft power strategy.

Keywords

China Donald Trump media discourse Othering soft power the United States

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

(2016) Finance Minister: China and US rely on each other. China Daily, 20 April. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2016-04/20/content_24686412.htm

Associated Press (2016) CCTV gets makeover in push overseas. South China Morning Post, 31 December. Available at: http://www.scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2058429/chinas-state-broadcaster-cctv-rebrands-international

Bailard

(2016) China in Africa: An analysis of the effect of Chinese media expansion on African public opinion. International Journal of Press/Politics 21(4): 446–471.

Barker

Hulme

Iversen

Loxley

(1985) Europe and Its Other: Proceedings of the Essex Conference on the Sociology of Literature, vol. I. Colchester: University of Essex.

Bastin

(2016) Trump and hypocrisy are US characteristics. China Daily, 23 April. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2016-04/23/content_24776977.htm

Bhattacharjya

(2016) Probing Chinese interest in US race. China Daily, 27 May. Available at: https://www.chinadailyasia.com/opinion/2016-05/27/content_15440174.html

Bially Mattern

(2005) Why ‘soft power’ isn’t so soft: Representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33(3): 583–612.

Browning

Joenniemi

(2017) Ontological security, self-articulation and the securitization of identity. Cooperation and Conflict 52(1): 31–47.

Bukh

(2007) Japan’s history textbooks debate: National identity in narratives of victimhood and victimization. Asian Survey 47(5): 683–704.

10.

Callahan

(2015) Identity and security in China: The negative soft power of the China Dream. Politics 35(3/4): 216–229.

11.

Cao

(2011) The language of soft power: Mediating socio-political meanings in the Chinese media. Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies 25(1): 7–24.

12.

Cao

(2014) China’s soft power. In Cao

Tian

Chilton

(eds) Discourse, Politics and Media in Contemporary China. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing, pp.171–194.

13.

Carey

(1989) Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. New York: Unwin Hyman.

14.

Cerny

(2011) Book review of The Future of Power. The Journal of Political Power 4(1): 145–150.

15.

Chen

(2015) US’ candidates have nothing to offer have-nots. China Daily, 28 August. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201508/28/WS5a6ae92ba3106e7dcc137007.html

16.

Chen

(2016a) Anti-trade rhetoric in US presidential campaign a deep concern. China Daily, 31 October. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-10/29/content_27212396.htm

17.

Chen

(2016b) Growing public anger reflects widespread feelings of impotence. China Daily, 4 March. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-03/04/content_23733321.htm

18.

Chen

(2016c) Money killing govt of the people, by the people, for the people. China Daily, 24 June. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-06/24/content_25830883.htm

19.

Chen

(2016d) US voters have to decide who is the lesser of two evils. China Daily, 29 July. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-07/29/content_26263982.htm

20.

China Daily (2016a) G20: Seeking ways for global growth. 2 September. Available at: http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201609/02/WS5a30d542a3108bc8c672f3fb.html

21.

China Daily (2016b) Money in politics deepens social divide. 2 March. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2016-03/02/content_23704925.htm

22.

China Daily (2016c) No change in US policy. 25 July. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-07/25/content_26203501.htm

23.

China Daily (2016d) Racist remarks smell of gunpowder. 15 March. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-03/15/content_23866177.htm

24.

China Daily (2016e) Telling China’s story to the world. 7 November. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-11/07/content_27291258.htm

25.

China Daily (2016f) Trump nomination another symptom of discontent. 21 July. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-07/21/content_26165292.htm

26.

China Daily (2016g) US presidential election now a slanging match. 12 October. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2016-10/12/content_27031003.htm

27.

Chitty

(2010) Mapping Asian international communication. Asian Journal of Communication 20(2): 181–196.

28.

Cho

Jeong

(2008) China’s soft power: Discussion, resources and prospects. Asian Survey 48(3): 453–472.

29.

Curran

(2002) Media and Power. London: Routledge.

30.

d’Hooghe

(2010) The Limits of China’s Soft Power in Europe: Beijing’s Public Diplomacy Puzzle. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

31.

Edney

(2012) Soft power and the Chinese propaganda system. Journal of Contemporary China 21(78): 899–914.

32.

Fairclough

(2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.

33.

Fairclough

Mulderrig

Wodak

(2011) Critical discourse analysis. In van Dijk

(ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: SAGE, pp.357–378.

34.

Feklyunina

(2016) Soft power and identity: Russia, Ukraine and the ‘Russian World(s)’. European Journal of International Relations 22(4): 773–796.

35.

Flew

(2016) Entertainment media, cultural power, and post-globalization: The case of China’s international media expansion and the discourse of soft power. Global Media and China 1(4): 278–294.

36.

Fürsich

(2010) Media and the representation of others. International Social Science Journal 61(199): 113–130.

37.

Gamson

Modigliani

(1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95(1): 1–37.

38.

Gao

Ingram

Kee

(eds) (2017) Global Media and Public Diplomacy in Sino-Western Relations. London: Routledge.

39.

Gill

Huang

(2006) Sources and limits of Chinese ‘soft power’. Survival 48(2): 17–36.

40.

Guzzini

(2013) Power, Realism and Constructivism. New York: Routledge.

41.

Hall

(1993) Encoding, decoding. In: During

(ed.) The Cultural Studies Reader. London: Routledge, pp.90–103.

42.

Hall

(1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: SAGE.

43.

Hall

(2010) An unclear attraction: A critical examination of soft power as an analytical category. Chinese Journal of International Politics 3(2): 189–211.

44.

Hayden

(2012) The Rhetoric of Soft Power: Public Diplomacy in Global Contexts. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

45.

Heng

(2010) Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the softest of them all? Evaluating Japanese and Chinese strategies in the ‘soft’ power competition era. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 10(2): 275–304.

46.

Hudson

(2015) ‘Forced to friendship’? Russian (mis-)understandings of soft power and the implications for audience attraction in Ukraine. Politics 35(3/4): 330–346.

47.

Hunter

(2009) Soft power: China on the global stage. Chinese Journal of International Politics 2(3): 373–398.

48.

Isakhan

Nwokora

Pan

(in press) Perceptions of democracy and the rise of Donald Trump: A framing analysis of Saudi Arabian media. Global Media and Communication.

49.

Jacques

(2009) When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. New York: Penguin Books.

50.

Kiseleva

(2015) Russia’s soft power discourse: Identity, status and the attraction of power. Politics 35(3/4): 316–329.

51.

Klaehn

(ed.) (2016) The Political Economy of Media and Power. New York: Peter Lang.

52.

Kluver

Cooley

Hinck

(2018) Contesting strategic narratives in a global context: The world watches the 2016 U.S. election. International Journal of Press/Politics 24: 92–114. DOI:10.1177/1940161218786426.

53.

Kunze

(2018) Tasting a good life narratives and counter-narratives of happiness in the documentary A Bite of China 2 (2014). China Perspectives (1–2): 45–53.

54.

Kurlantzick

(2007) Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power Is Transforming the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.

55.

Laclau

Mouffe

(2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd edn. London: Verso.

56.

Lai

(2012) China’s Soft Power and International Relations. New York: Routledge.

57.

Lams

(2017) Othering in Chinese official media narratives during diplomatic standoffs with the US and Japan. Palgrave Communications 3(1): 1–11.

58.

Lee

(2010) Bound to rise: Chinese media discourse on the new global order. In Curtin

Shah

(eds) Reorienting Global Communication: Indian and Chinese Media beyond Borders. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp.260–283.

59.

Lee

(2009) A theory of soft power and Korea’s soft power strategy. Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 21(2): 205–218.

60.

(2008a) Nuli goujian xiandai chuanbo tixi, tigao guonei guoji chuanbo nengli [Strive to construct a modern communication system, improve domestic and international communication capacity]. People’s Daily, 23 December. Available at: http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/1024/8563595.html

61.

(2018) Taihu Forum, China Daily to strengthen soft power. China Daily, 29 August. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201808/29/WS5b85f5e2a310add14f38853c.html

62.

(2008b) China debates soft power. Chinese Journal of International Politics 2(2): 287–308.

63.

(2009) Soft power in Chinese discourse: popularity and prospect. In Li

(ed.) Soft Power: China’s Emerging Strategy in International Politics. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp.45–60.

64.

Loh

(2017) Defending China’s national image and ‘defensive soft power’: The case of Hong Kong’s ‘Umbrella Revolution’. Journal of Chinese Political Science 22(1): 117–134.

65.

Lowery

DeFleur

(1988) Milestones in Mass Communication Research: Media Effects, 2nd edn. New York: Longman.

66.

Lukes

(2005) Power: A Radical View, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

67.

Luther

Zhou

(2005) Within the boundaries of politics: News framing of SARS in China and the United States. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 82(4): 857–872.

68.

Manners

(2002) Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 238–258.

69.

March

. (2018) Re-evaluating China’s global media expansion. Westminster Papers on Communication and Culture 13(1): 143–146. Available at: https://www.westminsterpapers.org/33/volume/13/issue/1/

70.

Moody

(2016) China ‘is still in a good place’. China Daily, 2 September. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201609/02/WS5a2b7a04a310eefe3e9a0738.html

71.

Nord

Mancini

Gerli

(2017) The Exceptional Election: Press Coverage of Clinton and Trump in Italy, Sweden and the UK. Sundsvall: Mid Sweden University.

72.

Norquay

(1999) Identity and forgetting. Oral History Review 26(1): 1–21.

73.

Nye

(2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

74.

Nye

(2011) The Future of Soft Power. New York: Public Affairs.

75.

Nye

(2018) China’s soft and sharp power. Project Syndicate, 4 January. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-soft-and-sharp-power-by-joseph-s–nye-2018–01

76.

Ostini

AYH

(2002) Beyond the four theories of the press: A new model of national media systems. Mass Communication and Society 5(1): 41–56.

77.

Pan

(2004) The ‘China threat’ in American self-imagination: The discursive construction of other as power politics. Alternatives 29(3): 305–331.

78.

Pan

(2009) ‘Peaceful rise’ and China’s new international contract: The state in change in transnational society. In: Li

(ed.) The Chinese State in Transition: Processes and Contests in Local China. London: Routledge, pp.127-144.

79.

Pan

(2012) Knowledge, Desire and Power in Global Politics: Western Representations of China’s Rise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

80.

Pan

Kosicki

(1993) Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication 10(1): 55–75.

81.

Pan

Lee

Chan

(1999) One event, three stories: Media narratives of the handover of Hong Kong in Cultural China. International Communication Gazette 61(2): 99–112.

82.

People’s Daily (2010) Beijing: China remains a developing country. 17 August. Available at: http://en.people.cn/90001/90780/91342/7107319.html

83.

Potter

Cooper

Dupagne

(1993) The three paradigms of mass media research in mainstream communication journals. Communication Theory 3(4): 317–335.

84.

Qin

(2006) Guoji guanxi lilun Zhongguo xuepai shengcheng de keneng he biran [The formation of the Chinese School of International Relations Theory: Its possibility and inevitability]. Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi [World Economics and Politics] (3): 7–13.

85.

Ramo

(2007) Brand China. London: Foreign Policy Centre.

86.

Ricoeur

(2004) Memory, History, Forgetting (trans. Blamey

Pellauer

). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

87.

Roselle

Miskimmon

O’Loughlin

(2014) Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict 7(1): 70–84.

88.

Said

(1981) Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. New York: Pantheon Books.

89.

Said

(1995) Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin Books.

90.

Sergunin

Karabeshkin

(2015) Understanding Russia’s soft power strategy. Politics 35(3–4): 347–363.

91.

Shambaugh

(2013) China Goes Global: The Partial Power. New York: Oxford University Press.

92.

Solomon

(2014) The affective underpinnings of soft power. European Journal of International Relations 20(3): 720–741.

93.

Sullivan

(2016) Celebrity culture is marching East. China Daily, 6 November. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201611/04/WS5a2b8632a310eefe3e9a0deb.html

94.

Sun

(2012) Japan and China as Charm Rivals: Soft Power in Regional Diplomacy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

95.

Sun

(2010) Mission impossible? Soft power, communication capacity, and the globalization of Chinese media. International Journal of Communication 4: 54–72.

96.

Sun

(2015) Slow boat from China: Public discourses behind the ‘Going Global’ media policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy 21(4): 400–418.

97.

Tang

(2016) Trade initiative is ‘direction of future’. China Daily, 28 September. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2016-09/28/content_26921728.htm

98.

Thussu

de Burgh

Shi

(eds) (2018) China’s Media Go Global. London: Routledge.

99.

Tsygankov

(2017) The dark double: The American media perception of Russia as a neo-Soviet autocracy, 2008–2014. Politics 37(1): 19–35.

100.

van Dijk

(1996) Power and the news media. In: Paletz

(ed.) Political Communication in Action: States, Institutions, Movements, Audiences. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp.9–36.

101.

van Dijk

(ed.) (2011) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2nd edn. London: SAGE.

102.

Van Gorp

(2007) The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication 57(1): 60–78.

103.

Wang

(2016) Narrative mediatisation of the ‘Chinese dream’ in Chinese and American media. Journal of Language and Politics 15(1): 45–62.

104.

Warren

(2014) Not by the sword alone: Soft power, mass media, and the production of state sovereignty. International Organization 68(1): 111–141.

105.

Wasserman

(2016) China’s ‘soft power’ and its influence on editorial agendas in South Africa. Chinese Journal of Communication 9(1): 8–20.

106.

Wodak

Meyer

(2009) Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology. In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: SAGE, pp. 1–33.

107.

Woods

(2016) Paul Beatty: ‘Being black is a full-time job’. China Daily (Hong Kong edition), 5 November.

108.

Wuthnow

(2008) The concept of soft power in China’s strategic discourse. Issues & Studies 44(2): 1–28.

109.

Xin

(2009) Xinhua news agency in Africa. Journal of African Media Studies 1(3): 363–377.

110.

Xin

(2010) Chindia’s challenge to global communication: A perspective from China. Global Media and Communication 6(3): 296–301.

111.

Yee

Zhu

(2002) Chinese perspectives of the China threat. In: Yee

Storey

(eds) The China Threat: Perceptions, Myths and Reality. London: Routledge, pp.21–42.

112.

Yin

(2016) Trump might be echoing fears of US people. China Daily, 18 March. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-03/18/content_23931682.htm

113.

Zhang

Wasserman

Mano

(2016) China’s Media and Soft Power in Africa: Promotion and Perceptions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

114.

Zhao

(2016) Presidential poll a test for US democracy. China Daily, 7 November. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-11/07/content_27291260.htm

115.

Zhao

(2013) China’s quest for ‘soft power’: Imperatives, impediments and irreconcilable tensions? Javnost–The Public: Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture 20(4): 17–29.

116.

Zhu

(2016) Overseas Chinese students weigh in on ‘bizarre’ US election. China Daily, 7 November. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/kindle/2016-11/07/content_27296509.htm