What affects the prospects of candidates in open intra-party elections? This research article examines the determinants of candidate performance in the first open party primaries conducted by LIVRE, a newly emerged Portuguese party, in 2015. This innovative process of candidate selection allowed individuals from outside the party not only to vote but also to run for office. Through the construction of an original dataset and the use of social network analysis, this study shows that centrality in the network of endorsements has a significant impact on the probability to be selected in party lists. Our findings shed additional light on the determinants of success in candidate selection and open new insights into the dynamics behind party primaries.
BarneaSRahatG (2007) Reforming candidate selection methods: A three-level approach. Party Politics13(3): 375–394.
2.
BartelsLM (1988) Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BawnKCohenMKarolD. (2012) A theory of political parties: Groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics10(3): 571–597.
4.
BernardiLSandriGSeddoneA (2016) Challenges of political participation and intra-party democracy: Bittersweet symphony from party membership and primary elections in Italy. Acta Politica. Epub ahead of print 11March. DOI: 10.1057/ap.2016.4.
CaliseM (2015) The personal party: An analytical framework. Italian Political Science Review45(3): 301–315.
7.
CarsonJLEngstromEJRobertsJM (2007) Candidate quality, the personal vote, and the incumbency advantage in congress. American Political Science Review101(2): 289–301.
8.
CohenMKarolDNoelH. (2008) The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
CrossWPKatzRS (2013) The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
DesmaraisBAMoscardelliVGSchaffnerBF. (2015) Measuring legislative collaboration: The Senate press events network. Social Networks40(1): 43–54.
11.
DominguezCBK (2011) Does the party matter? Endorsements in congressional primaries. Political Research Quarterly64(3): 534–544.
12.
FowlerJHHeaneyMTNickersonDW. (2011) Causality in political networks. American Politics Research39(2): 437–480.
13.
GallagherMMarshM (1988) Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. London: SAGE Publishing.
14.
GaujaA (2012) The ‘push’ for primaries: What drives party organisational reform in Australia and the United Kingdom?Australian Journal of Political Science47(4): 641–658.
15.
GelmanAHillJ (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GherghinaS (2013) One-Shot party primaries: The case of the Romanian social democrats. Politics33(3): 185–195.
17.
GherghinaSChiruM (2010) Practice and payment: Determinants of candidate list position in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics11(4): 533–552.
18.
GibsonRK (2015) Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning. Party Politics21(2): 183–197.
HayesAFCaiL (2007) Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods39(4): 709–722.
21.
HazanRYRahatG (2010) Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
IndriðasonIHKristinssonGH (2015) Primary consequences: The effects of candidate selection through party primaries in Iceland. Party Politics21(4): 565–576.
23.
JalaliCLisiM (2009) Weak societal roots, strong individual patrons? Patronage and party organization in Portugal. Revista Enfoques7(11): 441–470.
24.
KarvonenL (2010) The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
25.
KatzRSMairP (2009) The cartel party thesis: A restatement. Perspectives on Politics7(4): 753–766.
26.
KenigO (2009) Democratization of party leadership selection: Do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests?Electoral Studies28(2): 240–247.
27.
KittilsonMCScarrowSE (2003) Political parties and the rhetoric and realities of democratization. In: CainBDaltonRScarrowS (eds) Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.59–80.
28.
KogerGMasketSNoelH (2009) Partisan webs: Information exchange and party networks. British Journal of Political Science39(3): 633–653.
29.
KousserTLucasSMasketS. (2015) Kingmakers or cheerleaders? Party power and the causal effects of endorsements. Political Research Quarterly68(3): 443–456.
30.
KristjánssonS (1998) Electoral politics and governance: Transformation of the party system in Iceland, 1970–1996. In: LaneJ-EPenningsP (eds) Comparing Party System Change. London: Routledge, pp.167–182.
31.
KrouwelA (2012) Party Transformations in European Democracies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
32.
LagoILoboMC (2014) Partisan turnout bias and district magnitude. Electoral Studies35: 150–158.
33.
LanzoneL (2013) Dai Meetup al Parlamento: candidati ed eletti del Movimento 5 Stelle. il Mulino14(4): 732–738.
34.
LanzoneMERombiS (2014) Who did participate in the online primary elections of the five star movement (M5S) in Italy? Causes, features and effects of the selection process. Partecipazione e Conflitto7(1): 170–191.
35.
LisiM (2015) Party Change, Recent Democracies, and Portugal: Comparative Perspectives. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
LIVRE/Tempo de Avançar (2015) Regulamento eleitoral para as eleições primárias. Available at: http://tempodeavancar.net/?page_id=916 (accessed 2 February 2016).
MasketSE (2009) No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
40.
MikulskaABScarrowSE (2010) Assessing the political impact of candidate selection rules: Britain in the 1990s. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties20(3): 311–333.
41.
MoscaLVaccariCValerianiA (2015) An internet-fuelled party? The five star movement and the web. In: TronconiF (ed.) Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement: Organisation, Communication and Ideology. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.127–151.
42.
NoelH (2012) Towards a networks theory of political parties: A social networks analysis of internal party cleavages in presidential nominations, 1972–2008. Paper prepared for the ‘American political parties: Past, present, and future’ conference, Charlottesville, VA, 8–9 October.
43.
NorrisP (1997) Introduction: Theories of recruitment. In: NorrisP (ed.) Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–14.
44.
PereiraPTAndrade e SilvaJ (2009) Citizens’ freedom to choose representatives: Ballot structure, proportionality and ‘fragmented’ parliaments. Electoral Studies28(1): 101–110.
45.
PiletJ-BCrossWP (2014) The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge.
46.
RamiroL (2016) Effects of party primaries on electoral performance: The Spanish Socialist primaries in local elections. Party Politics22(1): 125–136.
47.
SandriGSeddoneA (2015) Introduction: Primary elections across the world. In: SandriGSeddoneAVenturinoF (eds) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.1–19.
48.
SandriGSeddoneAVenturinoF (2015a) Conclusion. In: SandriGSeddoneAVenturinoF (eds) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.181–197.
49.
SandriGSeddoneAVenturinoF (2015b) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate.
50.
ScottJ (2000) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: SAGE Publishing.
51.
TavaresdeAlmeidaPCosta PintoA (2003) Portuguese ministers, 1851–1999: Social background and paths to power. In: Tavares de AlmeidaPPintoACBermeoNG (eds) Who Governs Southern Europe? Regime Change and Ministerial Recruitment, 1850–2000. London: Frank Cass, pp.4–37.
52.
TeixeiraCP (2009) O Povo Semi-Soberano. Partidos Políticos e Recrutamento Parlamentar em Portugal. Coimbra: Almedina.
53.
WautersBRahatGKenigO (2015) Democratising party leadership selection in Belgium and Israel. In: SandriGSeddoneAVenturinoF (eds) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.85–103.
54.
WhiteleyPF (2011) Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics17(1): 21–44.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
