The Fukushima catastrophe has led to important practical and conceptual shifts in contemporary Japanese architecture which in turn has led to a re-evaluation of the influential 1960s Japanese modern architecture movement, Metabolism. The Metabolists had the ambition to create a new Japanese society through techno-utopian city planning. The new generation of Japanese architects, after the Fukushima event, no longer seek evolutionally social change; rather, the disaster has made them re-consider what architecture is and what architects can do for people who had everything snatched from them by technology (nuclear power station) and nature (earthquake and tsunami). Drawing on the architectural projects of Tange Kenzo and Metabolists in the 1960s and Ito Toyo’s ‘Home-for-All project’ in 2011, the paper explores this major paradigm shift in Japanese architectural theory and practices.
AbdouMaliqS (2013) Cities of uncertainty: Jakarta, the urban majority, and inventive political technologies. Theory, Culture & Society30(7–8): 243–263.
2.
BanhamR (1967) A clip-on architecture. Kenchiku Bunka243: 149–152.
3.
BanhamR (1976) Megastructure: Urban Futures of the Recent Past, New York: Harper & Row.
4.
BarnettJ (1986) The Elusive City: Five Centuries of Design, Ambition and Miscalculation, New York: Harper Collins.
5.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: SAGE.
6.
CrandallJ (2010) The geospatialization of calculative operations: Tracking, sensing and megacities. Theory, Culture & Society27(6): 68–90.
Gabrys J (2014) Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32(1): 30–48.
9.
HajerM (1999) The generic city. Theory, Culture & Society16(4): 137–144.
10.
Holden S (2009) Megastructures revisited: The Australian entries to the Plateau Beaubourg competition, 1970–1971. In: Cultural Crossroads: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians, Auckland, New Zealand, 2–5 July.
11.
HughesJSadlerS (2000) Non-Plan: Essays on Freedom Participation and Changes in Modern Architecture and Urbanism, Oxford: Architectural Press.
12.
Isozaki A (1991 [1962]) City Demolition Industry, Inc. In: Arata Isozaki: Architecture 1960–1990. Los Angeles: Museum of Contemporary Art, pp. 49–51 (originally published in Shin Kenchiku, November 1962).
13.
IsozakiA (2001) Unbuilt, Tokyo: Toto.
14.
IsozakiA (2003) Kenchiku ni okeru Nihontekina mono [Japanese-ness in Architecture], Tokyo: Shinchosha.
15.
IsozakiA (2011) Japanese-ness in Architecture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
JacquetB (2006) Principles of latent monumentality in Tange Kenzo’s ‘Concepts of Tradition and Creation: Study of the Formation of Tange Kenzo’s Architectural Discourse’. Journal of Architectural Planning AIJ601: 211–216.
17.
JencksC (1973) Modern Movement in Architecture, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
18.
KikutakeK (2008 [1969]) Taisha Kenchikuron- Ka Kata Katachi [Metabolism Architectural Theory], Tokyo: Shokokusha.
19.
Kikutake K (2009) When Metabolism was born of renovation. The Japan Architect Spring: 12–27.
LeGatesLRStoutF (1996) Introduction to Part Five. In: LeGatesLRStoutF (eds) The City Reader, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
28.
LevitasR (1982) Dystopian times? The impact of the death of progress on utopian thinking. Theory, Culture & Society1(1): 53–64.
29.
LinZ (2010) Kenzo Tange and the Metabolist Movement: Urban Utopias of Modern Japan, London: Routledge.
30.
MazlishB (2003) A tale of two enclosures: Self and society as a setting for utopias. Theory, Culture & Society20(1): 43–60.
31.
MiyoshiMHarootunianH (1993) Japan in the World, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
Mori Art Museum (ed.) (2012) Metabolism: The City of the Future: Dreams and Visions of Reconstruction in Postwar and Present-Day Japan, Tokyo: Shinkenchikusha.
33.
NederF (2008) Fuller Houses: R. Buckminster Fuller’s Dymaxion Dwellings and Other Domestic Adventures, Baden: Lars Muller Publishers.
Ross MF (1978) ‘Beyond Metabolism’: The New Japanese Architecture. New York: McGraw-Hill (translated by Kouichi Ichii and Hiroshi Yoshikawa (1978) Metaborizumu ikou –Sengo Nihon Kenchiku no Kiseki. Tokyo: Nikkei Makurouhiru).
39.
SadlerS (2005) Archigram: Architecture without Architecture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
ScottDF (2007) Architecture or Techno-Utopia: Politics after Modernism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Simone A (2011) The surfacing of urban life: A response to Colin MacFarlane and Neil Brenner, David Madden and David Wachsmuth. City 15(3–4): 356–364.
42.
TangeK (1967) Gendai Kenchiku wa dou shinten suruka [How does contemporary architecture develop? Four questions to Kenzo Tange]. Kenchiku Bunka243: 53–56.
43.
TangeK (1985a) A plan for Tokyo, 1960. In: BunjiMurotani (ed.) Process Architecture, Tokyo: Process Architecture Publishing Co Ltd.
44.
TangeK (1985b) Ippon no enpitsukara [From a Pencil], Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha.
45.
TangeK (2011 [1979]) Toshi to Kenchiku [City and Architecture], Tokyo: Shoukokusha.
46.
TangeK (2011 [1984]) Ningen to Kenchiku [Humanity and Architecture], Tokyo: Shoukokusha.
47.
TangeKKawazoeN (1968) Gijyutu to Ningen – Toshi Kenchiku Sekkei Kenkyujyo 1955–1964 [Technique and Human Being – The City Architecture Planning Institute 1955–1964], Tokyo: Bijyutu Shuppansha.
48.
Toyokawa S (2008) Japanese architecture of the 20th century, ‘La gaya scienza’: The Research of Regional, Urban and Architecture in Tange Laboratory. 10+1(Ten Plus One) 50 [special issue on Tokyo Metabolism 2010/50 Years after 1960]: 80–94.
49.
TurnbullJ (2012) Toyo Ito: Forces of Nature, New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
50.
TurnerBS (1992) Ideology and utopia in the formation of an intelligentsia: Reflections of the English cultural conduit. Theory, Culture & Society9(1): 183–210.
51.
Yatsuka H (2008) 50 Years after 1960: Introduction to the Global City Studies. 10+1(Ten Plus One) 50 [special issue on Tokyo Metabolism 2010/50 Years after 1960]: 62–76.
52.
YatsukaH (2011) Metabolism Nexus, Tokyo: Ohmsha.
53.
ZeviB (1950) Towards an Organic Architecture, London: Faber & Faber.
