This commentary responds to Ayona Datta’s critique of India’s smart city agenda by emphasizing the representational work that urban futures require. In the context of Dholera smart city, I draw attention to the discursive terrains – around city-ness and utopianism in particular – mobilized by the state in order to normalize the inevitability of exclusionary urban planning and imaginations. I suggest these representational fields are key battlegrounds for critical urban geography.
DattaA (2015) New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography5(1): 3–22.
3.
GidwaniV (2008) Capital Interrupted: Agrarian Development and the Politics of Work in India. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
JazeelT (2014) Subaltern geographies: geographical knowledge and postcolonial strategy. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography35: 88–103.
5.
LefebvreH (2003 [1970]) The Urban Revolution(Robert Bononno, Trans.). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
WachsmithD (2014) City as ideology: reconciling the explosion of the city form with tenacity of the concept. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32 (1): 75–90.
