The food-energy-climate change trilemma refers to the stark alternatives presented by the need to feed a world population growing to nine billion, the attendant risks of land conversion and use for global climate change, and the way these are interconnected with the energy crisis arising from the depletion of oil. Theorizing the interactions between political economies and their related natural environments, in terms of both finitudes of resources and generation of greenhouse gases, presents a major challenge to social sciences. Approaches from classical political economy, transition theory, economic geography, and political ecology, are reviewed before elaborating the neo-Polanyian approach adopted here. The case of Brazil, analysed with an `instituted economic process’ framework, demonstrates how the trilemma is a spatial and historical socio-economic phenomenon, varying significantly in its dynamics in different environmental and resource contexts. The paper concludes by highlighting challenges to developing a social scientific theory in this field.
AleklettK (2010) The peak of the oil age – Analysing the world oil production reference scenario in World Energy Outlook 2008. Energy Policy38(3): 1398–1414.
2.
AllenRC (2009) The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BakkerK (2003) An Uncooperative Commodity: Privatising Water in England and Wales, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BakkerK (2005) Neoliberalising nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers95(3): 542–565.
5.
BakkerKBridgeG (2006) Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’. Progress in Human Geography30(1): 5–27.
6.
BarzelayM (1986) The Politicized Market Economy. Alcohol in Brazil's Energy Strategy, Berkeley: University of California Press.
BlockF (2007) Understanding the diverging trajectories of Europe and the United States: A neo-Polanyian analysis. Politics & Society35(1): 1–31.
9.
BlockF (2008) Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics & Society36(2): 169–206.
10.
BlockFEvansP (2005) The state and the economy. In: SmelserNJSwedbergR (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 505–526.
11.
BridgeGLe BillonP (2013) Oil, Cambridge: Polity.
12.
BridgeGWoodA (2010) Less is more: Spectres of scarcity and the politics of resource access in the upstream oil sector. Geoforum41: 565–576.
13.
BurneyJA (2010) Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107(27): 12052–12057.
14.
CastreeN (2009) Crisis, continuity and change: Neoliberalism, the left, and the future of capitalism. Antipode41: 185–213.
15.
CastreeN (2010) Neoliberalism and the biophysical environment: A synthesis and evaluation of the research. Environment and Society: Advances in Research1: 5–45.
16.
CavalloAJ (2005) Hubbert's model: Uses, meanings and limits. Oil and Gas Journal103(21): 20–26.
17.
ColeHSDFreemanCJahodaMPavittK (1973) Thinking about the Future: A Critique of the Limits to Growth, London: Chatto and Windus.
18.
De AlmeidaEFBomtempoJVDe Souza e SilvaCM (2007) The performance of Brazilian biofuels: An economic, environmental and social analysis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro: Working Paper, pp. 5.
19.
DefeyesKS (2001) Hubbert's Peak: The Impending World Oil Shortage, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
De SousaPTDall'OglioEL (2008) The ethanol and biodiesel programmes in Brazil. In: MytelkaLKBarnesG (eds) Making Choices about Hydrogen: Transport Issues for Developing Countries, Montreal: UNU Press/IDRC, pp. 118–140.
21.
DIEESE (Departamento Intersindical de Estatistica e Estudos Socioeconomicos) (2007) O PAC, o setor de hidrocarbonetos e a matrix energética Brasiliera, Technical Note 43. São Paulo.
22.
DoornboschRSteenblickR (2007) Biofuels: Is the cure worse than the disease?OECD Round Table on Sustainable Development, Paris11–12 September.
EvansP (1979) Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, National and Local Capital in Brazil, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
EvansP (1982) Reinventing the bourgeoisie: State entrepreneurship in dependent capitalist development. American Journal of Sociology88(Suppl): 210–247.
26.
EvansRJ (1987) Death in Hamburg: Society and Politics in the Cholera Years, 1830–1910, London: Penguin.
FreemanC (1996) The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change53: 27–39.
31.
GallagherE (2008) The Gallagher Review of the Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production, London: The Renewable Fuels Agency.
32.
GeelsFW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: Multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy31: 1257–1274.
33.
GeelsFW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy33: 896–920.
34.
GeelsFW (2006) The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930: The dynamics of regime transformation. Research Policy35: 1069–1082.
35.
GeelsFW (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy39: 495–510.
36.
GeelsFWSchotJ (2007) Typology of socio-technical transition pathways. Research Policy36: 399–417.
37.
GoldembergJ (2008) The Brazilian biofuels industry. Biotechnology for Biofuels1(6): 1–7.
38.
HallAL (2008) Better RED than dead: Paying the people for environmental services in Amazonia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences36(3): 1925–1932.
39.
HallidayS (2001) The Great Stink of London: Sir Joseph Bazalgette and the Cleansing of the Victorian Metropolis, Stroud: The History Press.
40.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
HarveyM (2007) Instituting economic processes in society. In: HarveyMRamloganRRandlesS (eds) Karl Polanyi: New Perspectives on the Place of the Economy in Society, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 163–184.
42.
HarveyM (2012) Drinking water and drinking-water: Trajectories of provision and consumption in the UK, Taiwan and Delhi., CRESI Working PaperAvailable at: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/2472/ (accessed 14 May 2014).
43.
HarveyMMcMeekinA (2005) Brazilian genomics and bioinformatics: Instituting new innovation pathways in a global context. Economy and Society34(4): 634–658.
44.
HarveyMMcMeekinA (2007) Public or Private Economies of Knowledge? Turbulence in the Biological Sciences, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
45.
HarveyMPilgrimS (2011) The new competition for land: Food, energy and climate change. Food Policy Journal36(S40–51): 40–51.
46.
HarveyMPilgrimS (2012) Rudderless in a sea of yellow: The European political economy impasse for renewable transport energy. New Political Economy18(3): 364–390.
47.
HarveyMQuilleySBeynonH (2002) Exploring the Tomato: Transformations in Nature, Economy and Society, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
48.
HechtSB (2005) Soybeans, development and conservation on the Amazon frontier. Development and Change36: 375–404.
49.
HechtSB (2011) From eco-catastrophe to zero deforestation? Interdisciplinarities, politics, environmentalisms and reduced clearing in Amazonia. Environmental Conservation39(1): 4–19.
HoughtonRA (2003) Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management, 1850–2000. Tellus558: 378–390.
52.
HoughtonRA (2008) Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes: 1850–2005. In: TRENDS: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
53.
IAASTD (2009) Agriculture at a Crossroads: A Global Report, Washington, DC: IAASTD.
54.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2011–12) World Energy Outlook, Paris: OECD/IEA.
55.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2013) Resources to Reserves: Oil, Gas, and Coal Technologies for the Energy Markets of the Future, Paris: OECD/IEA.
56.
JohnsonFI (1983) Sugar in Brazil: Policy and production. Journal of Developing Areas17(2): 243–256.
57.
KaldorN (1986) Limits on growth. Oxford Economic Papers38(2): 187–198.
MansfieldB (2004) Rules of privatisation: Contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers94(3): 565–584.
60.
MathewsJA (2008) Towards a sustainably certifiable futures contract for biofuels. Energy Policy36(5): 1577–1583.
61.
McCarthyJPrudhamS (2004) Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum35: 275–283.
62.
MeadowsDRandersJMeadowsD (2004 [1972]) Limits to Growth: A 30-Year Update, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
63.
MeyerWBTurnerBL (1992) Human population growth and global land-use/cover change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics23: 39–61.
64.
NefJU (1932) The Rise of the British Coal Industry, London: Routledge.
65.
NepstadDC (2006) Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: Opportunities for conservation. Conservation Biology20(6): 1595–1603.
66.
NepstadDC (2008) Interactions among Amazon land use, forests and climate: Prospects for a near-term forest tipping point. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B363: 1737–1746.
67.
NewellPPattersonM (2010) Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
NurnbergB (1986) Structural change and state policy: The politics of sugar in Brazil since 1964. Latin American Research Review21(2): 53–92.
69.
O'ConnorJ (1998) Natural Causes, New York: Guilford.
70.
OlivierJGJJanssens-MaenhoutGPetersJAHWWilsonJ (2012) Long-term Trends in Global CO2 Emissions: 2012 Report, The Hague: PBL/JRC.
71.
PacalaSSocolowR (2004) Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science305: 968–972.
72.
PeckJ (2013) For Polanyian economic geographies. Environment and Planning A45: 1545–1568.
PilgrimSHarveyM (2010) Battles over biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the politics of markets. Sociological Research Online15(3–4)
75.
PolanyiK (1957) The economy as instituted process. In: PolanyiKArensbergCPearsonH (eds) Trade and Market in Early Empires, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 243–269.
76.
PomeranzK (2000) The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
77.
PousaGPAG (2007) History and policy of biodiesel in Brazil. Energy Policy35(11): 5393–5398.
78.
PrettyJ (2008) Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society363: 447–465.
79.
PrudhamS (2007) Sustaining sustained yield: Class, politics and post-war forest regulation in British Columbia. Environment and Planning D25: 258–283.
80.
Puppim de OliveiraJA (2002) The policymaking process for creating competitive assets for the use of biomass energy: The Brazilian alcohol programme. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews6: 129–140.
81.
RomanelliT (2008) Ethanol and sustainability issues – the case of Brazil, Presentation, ESALQ, Piracicaba7 July. Personal communication.
82.
Rosillo-CalleFCortezLAB (1998) Towards ProAlcool II – a review of the Brazilian bioethanol programme. Biomass and Bioenergy14(2): 115–124.
83.
Royal Society (2009) Reaping the Benefits: Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture, London: Royal Society.
84.
SearchingerTHeimlichRHoughtonRA (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science319: 1238–1240.
85.
SmithAStirlingABerkhoutFT (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy34: 1491–1510.
86.
SorrelS (2009) Global Oil Depletion: An Assessment of the Evidence for a Near Term Peak in Global Oil Production, (Report: Technology and Policy Assessment Function of the UK Energy Research Centre). Brighton: University of Sussex.
87.
SwyngedouwE (2004) Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88.
SwyngedouwE (2007) Dispossessing H2O: The contested terrain of water privatization. In: HeynonNMcCarthyJPrudhomSRobbinsP (eds) Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences, London: Routledge, pp. 51–62.
89.
ThomasB (1986) Was there an energy crisis in Great Britain in the 17th century?Explorations in Economic History23: 124–152.
90.
TilmanD (2009) Beneficial biofuels – the food, energy and environment trilemma. Science325: 270–271.
91.
UK Government Office for Science (2011) The Future of Food and Farming. Challenges and Choices for Global Sustainability, London: Global Forum on Agricultural Research.
UnruhGC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy28(12): 817–830.
94.
WilkinsonJ (2009) Globalisation of agribusiness and developing world food systems. Monthly Review61(4): 38–49.
95.
WilkinsonJ (2011) From fair trade to responsible soy: Social movements and the qualification of agrofood markets. Environment and Planning A43: 2012–2026.
96.
WilkinsonJHerreraS (2008) Making Agrofuels Work for the Poor: A Brazilian Case Study, London: Oxfam.
97.
WilkinsonJHerreraS (2010) Biofuels in Brazil: Debates and impacts. Journal of Peasant Studies37(4): 749–768.
98.
WoodsJ (2009) Future feedstocks for biofuel systems. In: HowarthRWBringezuS (eds) Biofuels: Environmental Consequences and Interactions with Changing Land Use, Ithaca, NY: SCOPEAvailable at: http://cip.cornell.edu/biofuels/ (accessed 14 May 2014).
99.
World Resources Institute (2005) Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Change Policy, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
