Over the past 6 years, the United Nations special rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De Schutter, has vigorously defended the case for small-scale and sustainable farming and has helped to establish the political legitimacy of food sovereignty in high-level expert fora. This commentary offers brief reflections on De Schutter’s contribution focusing on the welcome shift of emphasis from food to nutritional security as well as his strong support for agroecology. It argues that he has offered a powerful and coherent alternative to the prevailing paradigm of productivism that has helped reshape food policy discourse.
De SchutterO (2014) Final report: The transformative potential of the right to food. Report to the 25th Session of the Human Rights Council HRC/25/57, January.
3.
De SchutterO (2013) Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. Report to 68th session of the UN General Assembly. September A/68/288: 3/22
4.
De SchutterO (2012)Report: Mission to Mexico. Report of a country visit 13 to 20 June 2011. Report to the 19th Session of the Human Rights Council /HRC/19/59/Add.2
5.
De SchutterO (2011) The transformative potential of agroecology. In: Holt-GiménezE (ed) Food Movements Unite!. Oakland: Food First Books, pp. 223–242.
6.
FeldmanSBiggsS (2012)The politics of international assessments: the IAASTD process, reception and significance. Journal of Agrarian Change12(1): 144–169.
7.
GliessmanS (2013) Agroecology: Growing the Roots of Resistance. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems37: 19–31.
8.
HunterDFanzoJ (2013) Introduction: Agricultural biodiversity, diverse diets and improving nutrition. In: JFanzoDHunterTBorelliFMattei (eds) Diversifying Food and Diets: Using Agricultural Biodiversity to Improve Nutrition and Health. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 1–13.
9.
International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) (2009) Synthesis Report: A Synthesis of the Global and Sub-Global IAASTD Reports, Washington: Island Press.
10.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) WGII AR5 (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability: Summary for Policymakers. Available at: www.ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5 (accessed 2nd April)
11.
JaroszL (2014) Comparing food security and food sovereignty discourses. Dialogues in Human Geography4(2): 168–181.
12.
KhouryCBjorkmanADempewolfH. (2014) Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Epub ahead of print 3 March 2014. doi:10.1073/pnas.1313490111
McEwanMPrainGHunterD (2013) Opening a can of mopane worms: can cross-sectoral partnerships leverage agricultural biodiversity for better quality diets? In: JFanzoDHunterTBorelliFMattei (eds) Diversifying Food and Diets: Using Agricultural Biodiversity to Improve Nutrition and Health. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 207–228.
15.
SageC (2014) The transition movement and food sovereignty: From local resilience to global engagement in food system transformation. Journal of Consumer Culture. Epub ahead of print 3 April 2014. doi:10.1177/1469540514526281.
16.
SageC (2013) The inter-connected challenges for food security from a food regimes perspective: Energy, climate and malconsumption. Journal of Rural Studies29(1): 71–80.
