‘Methods’ and their devices have been conventionally viewed as the means through which the move from world to representation (and back again) might be reliably performed. An alternative view, perhaps most clearly exemplified by the post-ANT empirical programme of ‘material semiotics’, sees methods and devices as integral to the ways particular ‘realities’ are enacted in practices of inscription and intervention. Drawing upon this latter work, the present paper examines the role of satellite images, GIS and GPS data and devices in the methods utilized in the location, identification and classification of ‘illegal deforestation’ in Brazilian Amazonia. Here we witness how efforts to render ‘deforestation’ into a stable object of knowledge, singular and coordinated, are countered by attempts to render it multiple and irreconcilable as methods and devices become entangled in the conflicts and antagonisms of social life.
BatesonG.(1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind, New York: Ballantine.
3.
BenjaminW.(1998 [1925]) The Origin of German Tragic Drama, trans. J. Osborne, London: Verso.
4.
BloorM. (2000) The South Wales Miners Federation, Miners’ Lungs and the Instrumental Use of Expertise, 1900–1950. Social Studies of Science30(1): 125–140.
5.
CastoriadisC.(1987) The Imaginary Institution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
Clegg, S. and Hardy, C. (1996) ‘Conclusion: Representations’. In: S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. London: SAGE, pp. 676–708.
7.
Cooper, R. (1992) ‘Formal Organization as Representation: Remote Control, Displacement and Abbreviation’. In: M. Reed and M. Hughes (eds) Rethinking Organization. London: SAGE, pp. 254–272.
8.
Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2010) Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1976) ‘Management and Utilization of the Tropical Moist Forest – Editorial: A New Awareness of Terra Incognita’, Unasylva 28: 112–113. URL: http://www.fao.org/docrep/k0050e/k0050e01.htm#editorial: a new awareness of terra incognita.
11.
FearnsideP. (2005) Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: History, Rates, and Consequences. Conservation Biology19(3): 680–688.
12.
Fonseca, F., Egenhofer, M., Agouris, P. and Câmara, G. (2002) ‘Using Ontologies for Integrated Geographic Information Systems’, Transactions in GIS 6(3): 231–257.
13.
FoucaultM.(1973) This is Not a Pipe, trans. J. Harkness, Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
FullerD. (2006) Tropical Forest Monitoring and Remote Sensing. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography27(1): 15–29.
15.
GarfinkelH.(1984 [1967]) Studies in Ethnomethodology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M. and Livingston, E. (1981) ‘The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 131–158.
17.
GoodmanN.(1995) Ways of Worldmaking, Indianapolis: Hackett.
18.
GreenB.(2009) Gerontology and the Construction of Old Age, New Brunswick: AldineTransaction.
19.
Hayes, N. and Rajão, R. (2011) ‘Competing Institutional Logics and Sustainable Development’, Journal of Information Technology for Development 17(1): 4–23.
20.
Heidegger, M. (1977) ‘The Age of the World Picture’. In: The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. W. Lovitt. New York: Garland, pp. 115–154.
21.
HollH.G. (2007) Second Thoughts on Gregory Bateson and Alfred Korzybski. Kybernetes36(7/8): 1047–1054.
22.
INPE (2008) Avaliação do INPE sobre o relatório: ‘Inspeção de pontos e áreas do DETER’ da secretaria de estado do meio ambiente – SEMA do governo do estado do Mato Grosso, São José dos Campos: INPE.
23.
Kallinikos, J. (1990) ‘Techniques of Notation and Behaviour’. Working Paper, Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University.
LatourB.(1987) Science in Action, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
26.
LatourB.(1993) We Have Never Been Modern, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
27.
LatourB.(1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Latour, B. (2004a) ‘Scientific Objects and Legal Objectivity’. In: A. Pottage (ed.) Law, Anthropology, and the Constitution of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–114.
29.
Latour, B. (2004b) ‘Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’, Critical Inquiry 30 (Winter): 225–248.
30.
LatourB.(2010) The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat, Cambridge: Polity Press.
LynchM. (1994) Representation is Overrated: Some Critical Remarks about the Use of the Concept of Representation in Science Studies. Configurations2(1): 137–151.
37.
Lynch, M. and McNally, R. (2003) ‘“Science,” “Common Sense,” and DNA Evidence’, Public Understanding of Science 12(1): 83–103.
38.
Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. (1990) ‘Introduction: Sociological Orientations to Representational Practice in Science’. In: M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–18.
MannheimK.(1936) ‘The Problem of the Sociology of Knowledge’. In: Ideology and Utopia, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
41.
MarcusG.E. (1995) Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology24: 95–117.
42.
MitchellT.(2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity, Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
MolA.(2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham: Duke University Press.
44.
Novaes, R.A., Martini, P.R., Tardin, A.T., Lorenzzetti, J.A. and Foresti, C. (1980) Relatório de atividades do ano de 1979: Departamento de sensoriamento remoto e programas da area. São José dos Campos: INPE.
45.
Roth, W. and Bowen, G.M. (1999) ‘Digitizing Lizards: The Topology of “Vision” in Ecological Fieldwork’, Social Studies of Science 29(5): 719–764.
46.
Sant’Anna, L. (2008) ‘Maggi diz que INPE mente sobre devastação’, Estado de São Paulo, 27 January.
47.
Tardin, A., dos Santos, A., Lee, D., Maia, F., Mendonça, F., Assunção, G., et al. (1979) Levantamento de areas de desmatamento na Amazônia legal atraves de imagens do satelite Landsat. No. INPE-1411-NTE/142. São José dos Campos: INPE.
48.
TaylorM.C.(1984) Erring: A Postmodern A/theology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
TurnerV.(1987) The Anthropology of Performance, New York: PAJ.
50.
UNEP (1972) Only One Earth, Geneva: United Nations.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
