In this article, traditional quantitative methods for collecting student opinions both at course and individual levels and possible qualitative alternatives are discussed. The latter include the use of focus groups. The authors conclude that students like this approach and that it can provide more comprehensive data than is usually available using a questionnaire methodology. They advocate a more widespread use of a focus-based approach while also acknowledging the need for a fuller evaluation of its advantages and disadvantages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Angelo, T.A.
(1991) Classroom Research: Early Lessons from Success. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 46. New York: Jossey-Bass Inc.
2.
Entwistle, N.J.
and Tait, H. (1990) `Approaches to Learning, Evaluation of Teaching, and Preferences for Contrasting Academic Environments', Higher Education19: 169-194.
3.
Entwistle, N.J.
and Ramsden, P. (1983) Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
4.
Gibbs, G.
(1995) `How Can Promoting Excellent Teachers Promote Excellent Teaching?'Innovations in Education and International Training32(1): 74-84.
5.
Hill, F.M.
and Taylor, A. (1991) `Total Quality Management in Higher Education', International Journal of Educational Management5(5): 4-9.
6.
Inglis, S.
(1992) `Focus Groups as a Useful Qualitative Methodology in Sports Management', Journal of Sports Management6(6): 173-178.
7.
Kirk, J.
and Miller, M.L. (1986) `Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research', Qualitative Research Methods 1. London: Sage University Papers.
8.
Kreuger, R.A.
(1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (2nd edition). London: Sage.
9.
Mackintosh, S.
and Tynan, C. (1994) `Assessing Marketing Planning in Small Firms Using a Focus Group Methodology', Marketing Education Group Conference Proceedings, pp. 587-596. Bradford, July
10.
Manchester Metropolitan University, Academic Division
(1994) A Framework for Quality: A University Handbook for Academic Quality Assurance (Manchester: Metropolitan University).
Prosser, M.
(1995) `Analysing Students' Experiences of Learning', Research Methods Workshop, International Student Learning Conference, Exeter University.
13.
Rowley, J.
(1995) `A New Lecturer's Simple Guide to Quality Issues in Higher Education', International Journal of Educational Management9(1): 24-27.
14.
Sykes, W.
(1991) `Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Market Research: A Review of Literature', Journal of the Market Research Society32(3): 289-327.
15.
Tull, D.S.
and Hawkins, D.I. (1990) Marketing Research, Measurement and Method (5th edn). London: Maxwell MacMillan.
