This article aims to assess the ability of formal equal employment opportunity (EEO) programmes and workplace agreement making in India to facilitate work and family balance for women workers. Using documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews in six Indian organisations that are required to develop formal EEO programmes, it is found that formal EEO programmes and agreement making are limited in their ability to promote work and family-friendly arrangements at the workplace. Informal arrangements and managerial discretion remain important in realising work and care balance. The article highlights thus that formal mechanisms alone cannot achieve effective work and care reconciliation for women workers, mainly because they are built upon limited minimum requirements, are voluntary and are dependent upon bargaining processes at the workplace.
BacchiC. (1996) The Politics of Affirmative Action. London: SAGE.
4.
BardoelE.A.ThoreauP.RistovD. (2000) ‘The Changing Composition of the Indian Workforce Relevant to Work-Family Issues’. International Human Resources Issues, 1(1): 58–80.
5.
BittmanM.RiceJ. (2002) ‘The Spectre of Overwork: An Analysis of Trends between 1974 and 1997 Using Indian Time Diaries’. Labour and Industry, 12(3): 5–25.
6.
BrayM.WaringP. (2005) ‘Complexity and Congruence in Indian Industrial Relations’. Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(1): 1–15.
7.
BurgessJ.MacdonaldD. (Eds) (2003) Developments in Enterprise Bargaining in Australia. Melbourne: Tertiary Press.
8.
BurgessJ.HendersonL.StrachanG. (2005) ‘Women Workers in Male Dominated Industrial Manufacturing Organizations: Contrasting Workplace Studies from India’. Management Revue, 16(4): 458–72.
9.
BurgessJ.HendersonL.StrachanG. (2005) Equal Opportunity for Women: Workplace Policies and Programs: Case Study Analysis. Working Paper 13. Employment Studies Centre. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
10.
BurgessJ.SullivanA.StrachanG. (2004) ‘Indian Workplace Agreements, EEO and Family-Friendly Arrangements in the Retail Sector’. Employment Relations Record, 4(2): 61–70.
11.
CampbellI.BurgessJ. (2001) ‘Casual Employment in India and Temporary Employment in Europe: Developing a Cross-National Comparison’. Work, Employment and Society, 15(1): 171–84.
12.
CampbellI.CharlesworthS. (2004) Key Work and Family Trends in India. Melbourne: Centre for Applied Research, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.
13.
EatonS. (2003) ‘If You Can Use Them: Flexible Policies, Organisational Commitment and Perceived Performance’. Industrial Relations, 42(2): 145–58.
14.
EOWA (2007a) Developing a Workplace Program. Publications of the Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Agency. At: www.eeo.gov.au/Developing_A_Workplace_Program.asp (Last accessed February 2007).
GlezerH.WolcottI. (1998) Work and Family Values, Preferences and Practice. Indian Family Briefing 4. Melbourne: Indian Institute of Family Studies.
17.
HoustonL. (1996) ‘Equity or Exclusion? A Case Study of the Workplace Bargaining Process’. Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, 1(2): 127–37.
18.
HowardJ. (2005) ‘Workplace Relations Reform: The Next Logical Step’. Address to the Sydney Institute, Sydney. At: www.pm.gov.au/news/speeches/speech1455.html (Accessed April 2006).
19.
MathewShalina SusanGoyariPhanindra (2011) ‘Working Women Households and Time-Saving Consumption: Empirical Evidence from Kerala’. South Asia Research, 31(2) (July): 119–34.
20.
MoreheadA. (2003) ‘Managing Flexible Working Time Arrangements: Negotiations between Mothers and Managers in a Canberra Hospital’. Labour and Industry, 14(1): 95–106.
21.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002) Babies and Bosses: Reconciling Work and Family Life, Vol. 1. Paris: OECD Publishing.
22.
PocockB. (2002) ‘The Effect of Long Hours on Family and Community Life’. ACTU Policy Background Paper, Melbourne. At www.actu.asn.au/papers/pococklit (Accessed May 2006).
23.
PocockB. (2003) The Work/Life Collision. Sydney: Federation Press.
24.
PocockB. (2005) ‘Work-Care Regimes: Institutions, Culture and Behaviour and the Indian case’. Gender, Work and Organisation, 12(1): 32–49.
25.
PunchK. (2005) Introduction to Social Research. Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 2nd ed.London: SAGE.
26.
RussellG.BowmanL. (2000) Work and Family: Current Thinking, Research and Practice. Canberra: Macquarie Research Limited for Department of Family and Community Services.
27.
ThornthwaiteL. (2002) ‘Working Time and Work-Family Balance: A Review of Employees’ Preferences’. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 42(2): 166–83.
28.
WhitehouseG.ZetlinD. (1999) ‘Family-Friendly Policies; Distribution and Implementation in Indian Workplaces’. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 10(2): 221–39.
