The purpose of this article is to more clearly understand the role of equivocality in the conflict and negotiation setting. 7b accomplish this goal, Relational Order Theory was described and used to plot communication strategies of intermediaries in the 1992-1993 Oslo peace negotiations between the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Israelis. The analysis discovered that parties, including the intermediaries, constructed their relational parameters slowly to move them away from a position of isolationist peace to a position of unconditional peace in which they were able to forge an agreement. Several lessons about Relational Order Theory, equivocality, and managing disputes are also discussed in concluding this article.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bavelas, B. J.
, Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Baxter, L. A.
(1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69-88.
3.
Bazerman, M.
, & Neale, M. (1992). Negotiating rationally. New York: Free Press
4.
Ben-Dor, G.
, & Dewitt, D. B. (1994). Confidence building measures in the Middle East. Boulder, CO: Westview.
5.
Boulding, K E.
(1990). Three faces of power. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Brown, P.
, & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-288). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bruck, C.
(1996, October 14). The wounds of peace. The New Yorker, p. 64-64.
8.
Burgoon, J. K.
, & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193-214.
9.
Bush, R.A.B.
, & Folger, J. P. (1995). The promise of mediation. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
10.
Corbin, J.
(1994). Gaza first. London: Bloomsbury.
11.
Diez, M. E.
(1986). Negotiation competence: A conceptualization of the rules of negotiation interaction. In D. G. Ellis & W A. Donohue (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language and discourses processes (pp. 223-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Donohue, W A.
(1991). Communication, marital dispute and divorce mediation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Donohue, W A.
(1995, November). Negotiating equivocality, and equivocality in negotiation: The relational paradox. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
14.
Donohue, W A.
, & Roberto, A. J. (1993). Relational development as negotiated order in hostage negotiations. Human Communication Research, 20, 175-198.
15.
Drake, L.
, & Donohue, W A. (1996). Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution. Communication Research, 23, 297-322.
16.
Kelman, H. C.
(1996). The interactive problem-solving approach. In C. A. Crocker & F. O. Hampson (Eds.), Managing global chaos: Sources of and responses to international conflict (pp. 1-19). Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
17.
King, J.
(1994). Handshake in Washington: The beginning ofMiddle Eastpeace?Reading, UK: Garnet.
18.
Millar, F. E.
, & Rogers, E. L. (1976). A relational approach to interpersonal communication. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp. 55-75). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Morley, I.
, & Stephenson, G. (1977). The social psychology of bargaining. London: Allen and Unwin.
20.
Pruitt, D. G.
(1996, November). Comments on the Oslo process. Paper presented at the Rubin Memorial conference, Cambridge, MA.
21.
Putnam, L. L.
(1990). Reframing integrative and distributive bargaining: A process approach. In B. H. Sheppard, M. H. Bazerman, & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 3-30). Greenwich, CT:JAI.
22.
Putnam, L. L.
, & Roloff, M. E. (1992). Communication and negotiation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Rawlins, W K
(1989). A dialectical analysis of the tensions, functions and strategic challenges of communication in young adult friendships. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 12 (pp. 157-189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Rawlins, W K.
(1992). Friendship matters. New York: Aldine.
25.
Strauss, A.
(1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social orderSan Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Tajfel, H.
, & Tmrner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
27.
Ibuval, S.
(1982). The peace brokers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Walton, R. E.
, & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Winter, D. G.
(1993). Power, affiliation, and war: Three tests of a motivational model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 532-545.
