The effects of status ascriptions (high vs. low) and accent (standard American vs. Mexican-American) upon perceptions of speaker status and solidarity are examined. Consequences of the independent variables for a novel dependent variable, perceived control of speech style, are examined also. One hundred and twenty-two respondents rated one of eight message versions in a between-group design. Results indicated, among other things, that: (1) status ascriptions and accent combined additively to affect judgements of speaker status, as did status ascriptions and diversity; (2) lexical diversity and accent affected both solidarity judgements and status judgements interactively, although the nature of the interactive effect differed across measures; and (3) lexical diversity was an especially potent determinant of perceptions of control of speech style. It is suggested that a clear picture of linguistic and non-linguistic determinants of judgements of speaker status is emerging.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aboud, F. E., Clément, R. and Taylor, D. M. (1974) Evaluational reactions to discrepancies between social class and language. Sociometry, 37, 239–50.
2.
Anderson, N. H. (1981) Foundations of information integration theory.New York: Academic Press.
3.
Bradac, J. J., Courtright, J. A. and Bowers, J. W. (1980) Effects of intensity, immediacy, and diversity upon receiver attitudes toward a belief-discrepant message and its source. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, and P. Smith (eds), Language: Social psychological perspectives.Oxford: Pergamon Press.
4.
Bradac, J. J., Courtright, J. A., Schmidt, G. and Davies, R. A. (1976) The effects of perceived status and linguistic diversity upon judgments of speaker attributes and message effectiveness. Journal of Psychology, 93, 213–20.
5.
Bradac, J. J., Desmond, R. J. and Murdock, J. I. (1977) Diversity and density: Lexically determined evaluative and informational consequences of linguistic complexity. Communication Monographs, 44, 273–83.
6.
Bradac, J. J., Hemphill, M. R. and Tardy, C. H. (1981) Language style on trial: Effects of ‘powerful’ and ‘powerless’ speech upon judgments of victims and villains. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 327–41.
7.
Bradac, J. J., Hosman, L. A. and Tardy, C. W. (1978) Reciprocal disclosures and language intensity: Attributional consequences. Communication Monographs, 45, 1–17.
8.
Bradac, J. J., Konsky, C. W. and Davies, R. A. (1976) Two studies of the effects of linguistic diversity upon judgments of communicator attributes and message effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 43, 70–79.
9.
Bradac, J. J., Martin, L. W., Elliott, N. D. and Tardy, C. W. (1980) On the neglected side of linguistic science: Multivariate studies of sentence judgment. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 18, 967–95.
10.
Bradac, J. J. and Mulac, A. (1984) Attributional consequences of powerful and powerless speech styles in a crisis-intervention context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 1–19.
11.
Brown, B. L. (1980) Effects of speech rate on personality attributions and competency evaluations. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson and P. M. Smith (eds), Language: Social psychological perspectives.Oxford: Pergamon Press.
12.
Edwards, J. R. (1982) Language attitudes and their implications among English speakers. In E. B. Ryan and H. Giles (ed.), Attitudes toward language variation: Social and applied contexts.London: Edward Arnold.
13.
Giles, H. and Farrar, K. (1979) Some behavioural consequences of speech and dress styles. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 209–10.
14.
Giles, H. and Powesland, P. F. (1975) Speech style and social evaluation.London: Academic Press.
15.
Giles, H. and Sassoon, C. (1983) The effect of speaker's accent, social class background and message style on British listeners' social judgements. Language & Communication, 3, 305–13.
16.
Giles, H., Wilson, P. and Conway, T. (1981) Accent and lexical diversity as determinants of impression formation and employment selection. Language Sciences, 3, 92–103.
17.
Kalin, R. (1982) The social significance of speech in medical, legal, and occupational settings. In E. B. Ryan and H. Giles (eds), Attitudes toward language variation: Social and applied contexts. London: Edward Arnold.
18.
Lambert, W. E. (1967) A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 91–109.
19.
Mulac, A. (1976) Assessment and application of the revised Speech Dialect Attitudinal Scale. Communication Monographs, 43, 238–45.
20.
Mulac, A. and Lundell, T. L. (1980) Differences in perceptions created by syntactic-semantic productions of male and female speakers. Communication Monographs, 47, 111–18.
21.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.
22.
Ryan, E. B. (1979) Why do low-prestige language varieties persist? In H. Giles and R. N. St. Clair (eds), Language and Social Psychology.Baltimore: University Park Press.
23.
Ryan, E. B. and Bulik, C. M. (1982) Evaluations of middle class speakers of standard American and German-accented English. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 51–61.
24.
Ryan, E. B., and Giles, H. (eds), (1982) Attitudes toward language variation: Social and applied contexts.London: Edward Arnold.
25.
Ryan, E. B. and Sebastian, R. (1980) The effects of speech style and social class background on social judgments of speakers. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 229–33.
26.
Scherer, K.R. (1979) Personality markers in speech. In K. R. Scherer and H. Giles (eds), Social markers in speech.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Snyder, M. (1979) Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology.New York: Academic Press.
28.
Stern, G. S. and Manifold, B. (1977) Internal locus of control as a value. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 237–42.
29.
Stewart, M. A., Ryan, E. B. and Giles, H. (in press) Accent and social class effects on status and solidarity evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
