This study examines the association between attachment style and text message behaviors using the text message history of 40 early-stage college student daters. Actor-partner interdependence models revealed an association between avoidant attachment and decreased texting frequency, but not an association between anxious attachment and texting frequency. Further, anxiously attached individuals utilized more future focused language in their text messages to their partner; avoidant attachment did not independently predict language use in text messages. Overall, there is evidence to support the impact of attachment style on the frequency of, and language use in, text messages between romantic partners, which serves as a next step to understand how attachment may affect everyday communication.
AgnewC. R.Van LangeP. A.RusbultC. E.LangstonC. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 939–954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939
2.
BanseR. (2004). Adult attachment and marital satisfaction: Evidence for dyadic configuration effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504041388
3.
BoaseJ.LingR. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12021
BoyleA. M.O'SullivanL. F. (2016). Staying connected: Computer-mediated and face-to-face communication in college students’ dating relationships. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(5), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0293
6.
BrinbergM.RamN. (2021). Do new romantic couples use more similar language over time? Evidence from intensive longitudinal text messages. Journal of Communication, 71(3), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab012
7.
BrinbergM.VanderbiltR. R.SolomonD. H.BrinbergD.RamN. (2021). Using technology to unobtrusively observe relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(12), 3429–3450. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211028654
8.
BrodyN.PeñaJ. (2015). Equity, relational maintenance, and linguistic features of text messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.037
9.
CassidyJ.ShermanL. J.JonesJ. D. (2012). What’s in a word? Linguistic characteristics of adult attachment interviews. Attachment & Human Development, 14(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.636649
ClarkG. I.RockA. J.ClarkL. H.Murray-LyonK. (2020). Adult attachment, worry and reassurance seeking: Investigating the role of intolerance of uncertainty. Clinical Psychologist, 24(3), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12218
12.
Core TeamR. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
13.
CreaseyG.JarvisP. (2008). Attachment theory and research: A special focus on relationship initiation. In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 75–94). Psychology Press.
14.
DeAndreaD. C.HolbertR. L. (2017). Increasing clarity where it is needed most: Articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1304163
15.
DomingueR.MollenD. (2009). Attachment and conflict communication in adult romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(5), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347932
DunlopW. L.KaranA.WilkinsonD.HarakeN. (2020). Love in the first degree: Individual differences in first-person pronoun use and adult romantic attachment styles. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(2), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619847455
18.
FastL. A.FunderD. C. (2008). Personality as manifest in word use: Correlations with self-report, acquaintance report, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.334
19.
FraleyR. C.ShaverP. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132
20.
GarciaR.KennyD. (2024). dyadr: Dyadic Data Analysis. R package version 0.0.0.9000.
21.
GillathO.ShaverP. R. (2007). Effects of attachment style and relationship context on selection among relational strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 968–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.11.003
22.
GuerreroL. K.BachmanG. F. (2006). Associations among relational maintenance behaviors, attachment-style categories, and attachment dimensions. Communication Studies, 57(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970600845982
23.
HallJ. A.PenningtonN. (2015). Mundane mobile maintenance, entrapment, and hyper-coordination. In YanZ. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mobile phone behavior (pp. 108–116). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
24.
JangS. A. (2008). The effects of attachment styles and efficacy of communication on avoidance following a relational partner's deception. Communication Research Reports, 25(4), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090802440220
25.
JinB.PeñaJ. F. (2010). Mobile communication in romantic relationships: Mobile phone use, relational uncertainty, love, commitment, and attachment styles. Communication Reports, 23, 39–51. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/08934211003598742 https://doi.org/10.1080/08934211003598742
26.
KaneH. S.JaremkaL. M.GuichardA. C.FordM. B.CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Feeling supported and feeling satisfied: How one partner's attachment style predicts the other partner's relationship experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507079245
27.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979909388499
28.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H.CruzM. G. (2001). The role of relationship development and attachment in the experience of romantic jealousy. Personal Relationships, 8(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00036.x
29.
LuoS. (2014). Effects of texting on satisfaction in romantic relationships: The role of attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.014
30.
MainM.GoldwynR.HesseE. (2002). Adult attachment scoring and classification systems, Version 7.1. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.
31.
MeyerD.ThomasD.HawkinsH. (2022). The relationship between pronoun use in couple interactions, attachment, and relationship satisfaction. The Family Journal, 30(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807211000092
32.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2012). Adult attachment orientations and relationship processes. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 4(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.003
33.
MoreyJ. N.GentzlerA. L.CreasyB.OberhauserA. M.WestermanD. (2013). Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.019
34.
NiehuisS.ReifmanA.FischerJ. L.LeeK. H. (2016). Do episodic self-and partner-uncertainty mediate the association between attachment orientations and emotional responses to relationship-threatening events in dating couples?Cognition and Emotion, 30(6), 1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1050999
35.
PennebakerJ. W.BoydR. L.BoothR. J.AshokkumarA.FrancisM. E. (2022). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC-22. Pennebaker Conglomerates.
36.
ShaverP.HazanC. (1987). Being lonely, falling in love: Perspectives from attachment theory. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2(2), 105–124.
37.
SillarsA.ShellenW.McIntoshA.PomegranateM. (1997). Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations. Western Journal of Communication, 61(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319709374587
38.
SimmonsR. A.GordonP. C.ChamblessD. L. (2005). Pronouns in marital interaction: What do “you” and “I” say about marital health?Psychological Science, 16(12), 932–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01639.x
39.
SimpsonJ. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.5.971
40.
SlatcherR. B.VazireS.PennebakerJ. W. (2008). Am “I” more important than “we”? Couples’ word use in instant messages. Personal Relationships, 15(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00207.x
WardeckerB. M.ChopikW. J.BoyerM. P.EdelsteinR. S. (2016). Individual differences in attachment are associated with usage and perceived intimacy of different communication media. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.029
43.
WeiM.RussellD. W.MallinckrodtB.VogelD. L. (2007). The experiences in close relationship scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268041
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
