Research on interactions involving police officers foregrounds the importance of their communicative practices for fostering civilians’ perceptions of police legitimacy. Building on this research, we describe a pattern of conduct that is a recurrent source of trouble in such encounters, which we call sequential standoffs. These standoffs emerge when two parties persistently pursue alternative courses of action, producing a stalemate in which neither progress in, nor exit from, either course of action appears viable. They are routinely resolved by officers (re)casting civilians’ pursuit of one course of action as constituting resistance to the officers’ proposed course of action, and thus as warranting officers’ use of coercive violence to resolve the stalemate. In some cases, however, officers resolve standoffs cooperatively using sequentially accommodative methods. We consider how these findings advance approaches to communicative dilemmas in policing, and their broader significance for scholars of social interaction, and of the interactional organization of conflicts.
BittnerE. (1970). The functions of police in modern society. Government Printing Office.
3.
BoldenG. (2009). Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 974–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.004
4.
BuscariolliA. (2023). Moving civilians to the front of patrol cars: Built space, embodiment, and social control during police encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 212, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.04.008
DersleyI.WoottonA. (2001). In the heat of the sequence: Interactional features preceding walkouts from argumentative talk. Language in Society, 30(4), 611–638. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501004043
7.
DixonT. L.SchellT. L.GilesH.DrogosK. L. (2008). The influence of race in police–civilian interactions: A content analysis of videotaped interactions taken during Cincinnati police traffic stops. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00398.x
8.
DrewP.HeritageJ. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In DrewP.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge University Press.
9.
DuckW. (2017). The complex dynamics of trust and legitimacy: Understanding interactions between the police and poor black neighborhood residents. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 673(1), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217726065
10.
EppC. R.Maynard-MoodyS.Haider-MarkelD. (2014). Pulled over: How police stops define race and citizenship. University of Chicago Press.
11.
FryerR. G.Jr. (2019). An empirical analysis of racial differences in police use of force. Journal of Political Economy, 128(10), 1210–1261. https://doi.org/10.1086/701423
12.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
13.
GilesH. (2023). Communication Accommodation Theory at 50: Recent developments. Language Sciences, in press.
14.
GilesH.EdwardsA. L.WaltherJ. B. (2023). Communication Accommodation Theory: Past accomplishments, current trends, and future prospects. Language Sciences, 99, 101571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101571
15.
GilesH.LinzD.BonillaD.GomezM. L. (2012). Police stops of and interactions with Latino and White (non-Latino) drivers: Extensive policing and communication accommodation. Communication Monographs, 79(4), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.723815
GoodwinM. H.CekaiteA. (2014). Orchestrating directive trajectories in communicative projects in family interaction. In Couper-KuhlenE.DrewP. (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 185–214). John Benjamins.
HaddingtonP.NevileM.MondadaL.KeisanenT. (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. John Benjamins. http://digital.casalini.it/9789027269805
20.
HeritageJ.ClaymanS. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Wiley-Blackwell.
21.
HeritageJ. (1984b). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity.
22.
HeritageJ.RaymondG. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In de RuiterJ. P. (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179–192). Cambridge University Press.
23.
HeritageJ. (1984a). A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In AtkinsonJ. M.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.
24.
HollanderM. M.MaynardD. W. (2016). Do unto others …? Methodological advance and self- versus other-attentive resistance in Milgram’s “obedience” experiments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516648967
25.
JeffersonG. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In LernerG. H. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–23). John Benjamins.
26.
JonesN.RaymondG. (2012). ‘The camera rolls’: Using third-party video in field research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 642, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212438205
27.
JoyceJ. B. (2022). Resistance in public disputes: Third-turn blocking to suspend progressivity. Discourse Studies, 24(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221090303
LernerG. H. (2019). When someone other than the addressed recipient speaks next: Three kinds of intervening action after the selection of next speaker. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(4), 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1657280
30.
LindströmA. (2017). Accepting remote proposals. In RaymondG.LernerG. H.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Enabling human conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff (pp. 125–142). John Benjamins.
MeehanA. J. (2018). Egon Bittner and the language practices of the police. Ethnographic Studies, 15, 159–188. https://doi.org//10.5281/zenodo.1475806
33.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority. An experimental view. Tavistock.
34.
PollnerM. (1975). The very coinage of your brain: The anatomy of reality disjunctures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 5, 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317500500304
35.
RaymondG. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939–967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752
36.
RaymondG. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone ‘so’ in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4
37.
RaymondG.JungleibL.ZimmermanD.JonesN. (2022). Rules and policeable matters: Enforcing the civil sidewalk ordinance for ‘another first time’. In HeritageJ.MaynardD. W. (Eds.), The ethnomethodology program: Legacies and prospects (pp. 162–187). Oxford University Press.
38.
RaymondG.LernerG. H. (2014). A body and its involvements: Adjusting action for dual involvements. In HaddingtonP.KeisanenT.MondadaL.NevileM. (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 227–246). John Benjamins.
39.
RaymondG.SidnellJ. (2019). Interaction at the boundaries of a world known in common: Initiating repair with ‘what do you mean?’. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1608100
40.
RaymondG.ZimmermanD. H. (2016). Closing matters: Alignment and misalignment in sequence and call closings in institutional interaction. Discourse Studies, 18(6), 716–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616667141
SacksH. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In ButtonG.LeeJ. R. E. (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 56–69). Multilingual Matters.
SchegloffE. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903
45.
SchegloffE. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. https://doi.org/10.1086/230911
SchegloffE. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019
SchegloffE. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
50.
SchegloffE. A.JeffersonG.SacksH. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041
StuartF. (2015). On the streets, under arrest: Policing homelessness in the 21st century. Sociology Compass, 9(11), 940–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12324
53.
StuartF. (2016a). Becoming “copwise”: Policing, culture, and the collateral consequences of street-level criminalization. Law & Society Review, 50(2), 279–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12201
54.
StuartF. (2016b). Down, out, and under arrest: Policing and everyday life in skid row. University of Chicago Press.
55.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
56.
TerrillW.MastrofskiS. D. (2002). Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 215–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095221
57.
TerrillW.ReisigM. D. (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(3), 291–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427803253800
58.
TylerT. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/652233
59.
TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation.
60.
Wagner-PacificiR. (2000). Theorizing the standoff: Contingency in action. Cambridge University Press.
61.
WhiteheadK. A. (2020). The problem of context in the analysis of talk-in-interaction: The case of implicit whiteness in post-apartheid South Africa. Social Psychology Quarterly, 83(3), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272519897595
62.
WhiteheadK. A.BowmanB.RaymondG. (2018). Risk factors’ in action: The situated constitution of ‘risk’ in violent interactions. Psychology of Violence, 8(3), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000182
63.
WhiteheadK. A.RaymondG.BowmanB. (frtha). Cross-cutting preferences in interactional trajectories toward violence.
64.
WhiteheadK. A.RaymondG.StokoeE. (frthb). Analyzing categorial phenomena in talk-in-interaction. In RobinsonJ. D.CliftR.KendrickK.RaymondC. W. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Methods in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
