How does language change reveal the psychological trajectories of people coping with a COVID-19 infection? This study examined writings on social media over 12 weeks from people who self-reported having tested positive for COVID-19. People used fewer words reflecting anxiety and distancing but more words indicating reinterpretation over time. The language patterns for describing the experience of COVID-19 infections differed from those for describing other unrelated topics. The findings reveal the temporal dynamics of psychological adjustment to an unfolding crisis.
AshokkumarA.PennebakerJ. W. (2021). Social media conversations reveal large psychological shifts caused by COVID-19’s onset across U.S. Cities. Science Advances, 7(39), eabg7843. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg7843
2.
AydukÖKrossE. (2008). Enhancing the pace of recovery: self-distanced analysis of negative experiences reduces blood pressure reactivity. Psychological Science, 19(3), 229–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02073.x
3.
BaumgartnerJ.ZannettouS.KeeganB.SquireM.BlackburnJ. (2020). The pushshift reddit dataset. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14, 830–839. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/7347
BoydR. L.SchwartzH. A. (2021). Natural language analysis and the psychology of verbal behavior: the past, present, and future states of the field. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967028
6.
ChungC. K.PennebakerJ. W. (2007). The psychological function of function words. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication: frontiers of social psychology (pp. 343–359). Psychology Press.
7.
CohnM. A.MehlM. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15(10), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00741.x
8.
GrossJ. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
9.
GruberJ.PrinsteinM. J.ClarkL. A.RottenbergJ.AbramowitzJ. S.AlbanoA. M.AldaoA.BorelliJ. L.ChungT.DavilaJ.ForbesE. E.GeeD. G.HallG. C. N.HallionL. S.HinshawS. P.HofmannS. G.HollonS. D.JoormannJ.KazdinA. E, … Weinstock, L. M. (2020). Mental health and clinical psychological science in the time of COVID-19: challenges, opportunities, and a call to action. American Psychologist, 76(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000707
10.
HargittaiE. (2020). Potential biases in big data: omitted voices on social media. Social Science Computer Review, 38(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318788322
11.
JucksR.HendriksF. (2021). Introduction: language and communication related to COVID-19. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(5-6), 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211045728
12.
MarkowitzD. M. (2022). Psychological trauma and emotional upheaval as revealed in academic writing: the case of COVID-19. Cognition and Emotion, 36(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.2022602.
13.
MehlM. R.RobbinsM. L.HolleranS. E. (2012). How taking a word for a word can be problematic: context-dependent linguistic markers of extraversion and neuroticism. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 3(2), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.2458/v3i2.16477
14.
OchsnerK. N.SilversJ. A.BuhleJ. T. (2012). Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: A synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion: functional imaging studies of emotion regulation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1251(1), E1–E24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x
15.
OrvellA.AydukÖMoserJ. S.GelmanS. A.KrossE. (2019). Linguistic shifts: A relatively effortless route to emotion regulation?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419861411
16.
PavlacicJ. M.BuchananE. M.MaxwellN. P.HopkeT. G.SchulenbergS. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of expressive writing on posttraumatic stress, posttraumatic growth, and quality of life. Review of General Psychology, 23(2), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019831645
17.
PennebakerJ. W.BoothR. J.BoydR. L.FrancisM. E. (2015). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC2015. Pennebaker Conglomerates.
18.
PennebakerJ. W.HarberK. D. (1993). A social stage model of collective coping: the loma prieta earthquake and the Persian gulf war. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01184.x
19.
PennebakerJ. W.KingL. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
SchnepfJ.LuxA.JinZ.FormanowiczM. (2021). Left out—feelings of social exclusion incite individuals with high conspiracy mentality to reject complex scientific messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(5-6), 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211044789
22.
SerajS.BlackburnK. G.PennebakerJ. W. (2021). Language left behind on social media exposes the emotional and cognitive costs of a romantic breakup. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), e2017154118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017154118
23.
SmithR. A.ZhuX.MartinM. A.MyrickJ. G.LennonR. P.SmallM. L.Van ScoyL. J., & Data4Action Research Group. (2022). Longitudinal study of an emerging COVID-19 stigma: media exposure, danger appraisal, and stress. Stigma and Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000359
24.
TianX.KimY.SolomonD. H. (2021). The effects of type of pronouns and hope appeals in supportive messages about COVID-19. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(5-6), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211044721
25.
ZhuX. (2022). Proximal language predicts crowdfunding success: behavioral and experimental evidence. Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 107213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107213
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
