Are U.S. political leaders becoming simpler in their rhetoric? To evaluate, we place the two most recent Presidents’ integrative complexity against a historical context for three different types of comparable materials. Results reveal that both Biden and Trump are simple when compared to the typical President. Further, segmented regression analyses reveal Biden's and Trump's low complexity is partially the continuation of an ongoing historical decline in complexity among Presidents. Importantly, this complexity decline is occurring for both Republicans and Democrats.
AbeJ. A. A. (2012). Cognitive–affective styles associated with position on war. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927x12438532
2.
ConwayL. G.IIIConwayK. R. (2011). The terrorist rhetorical style and its consequences for understanding terrorist violence. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 4(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2011.627940
3.
ConwayL. G.IIIConwayK. R.GornickL. J.HouckS. C. (2014). Automated integrative complexity. Political Psychology, 35(5), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12021
4.
ConwayL. G.IIIConwayK. R.HouckS. C. (2020). Validating automated integrative complexity: natural language processing and the Donald Trump test. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2), 504–524. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1307
5.
ConwayL. G.IIIGornickL. J.BurfiendC.MandellaP.KuenzliA.HouckS. C.FullertonD. T. (2012). Does simple rhetoric win elections? An integrative complexity analysis of U.S. Presidential campaigns. Political Psychology, 33(5), 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00910.x
6.
ConwayL. G.IIIGornickL. J.HouckS. C.Hands TowgoodK.ConwayK. R. (2011). The hidden implications of radical group rhetoric: integrative complexity and terrorism. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 4(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2011.627938
7.
DemeterM. (2017). Control, communication, and the voice of the leader. A control-character analysis of the 2016 US Presidential debate. KOME, An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 5(1), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.2017.13
8.
FayN.EllisonT. M. (2013). The cultural evolution of human communication systems in different sized populations: usability trumps learnability. PLoS ONE, 8(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071781
9.
HansfordT. G.CoeC. (2019). Linguistic complexity, information processing, and public acceptance of Supreme Court decisions. Political Psychology, 40(2), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12497
HouckS. C.ConwayL. G.III. (2019). Strategic communication and the integrative complexity-ideology relationship: meta-analytic findings reveal differences between public politicians and private citizens in their use of simple rhetoric. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1119–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12583
HouckS. C.RepkeM. A.ConwayL. G.III. (2017). Understanding what makes terrorist groups’ propaganda effective: An integrative complexity analysis of ISIL and Al Qaeda. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 12(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2017.1351032
JebbA. T.TayL.WangW.HuangQ. (2015). Time series analysis for psychological research: examining and forecasting change. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 727. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00727
16.
JordanK. N.SterlingJ.PennebakerJ. W.BoydR. L. (2019). Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(14), 7148–7148. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811987116
17.
JuolaP. (2013). Using the Google N-Gram corpus to measure cultural complexity. Literary & Linguistic Computing, 28(4), 668–675. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt017
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
21.
LiuZ. (2016). A diachronic study on British and Chinese cultural complexity with Google Books Ngrams. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 23(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2016.1226431
MarkowitzD. M. (2022). How experts react: The World Health Organization’s appraisal of COVID-19 via communication patterns. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 41(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211026346
25.
RepkeM. A.ConwayL. G.IIIHouckS. C. (2018). The strategic manipulation of linguistic complexity: A test of two models of lying. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(2), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17706943
26.
SaslowL. R.McCoyS.LöweI.CosleyB.VartanA.OveisC.KeltnerD.MoskowitzJ. T.EpelE. S. (2014). Speaking under pressure: Low linguistic complexity is linked to high physiological and emotional stress reactivity. Psychophysiology, 51(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12171
27.
SchallerM.HoferM. K.BeallA. T. (2017). Evidence that an Ebola outbreak influenced voting preferences, even after controlling (mindfully) for autocorrelation: reply to Tiokhin and Hruschka (2017). Psychological Science, 28(9), 1361–1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617718183
28.
SuedfeldP. (2010). The cognitive processing of politics and politicians: archival studies of conceptual and integrative complexity. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1669–1702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00666.x
29.
SuedfeldP.RankA. D. (1976). Revolutionary leaders: long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.169
30.
SuedfeldP.TetlockP. E.RamirezC. (1977). War, peace, and integrative complexity: UN speeches on the Middle East problem, 1947–1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21(3), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277702100303
31.
TetlockP. E. (1981). Pre-to postelection shifts in presidential rhetoric: impression management or cognitive adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.207
32.
TetlockP.E. (1985). Integrative complexity of American and soviet foreign policy rhetoric: A time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1565–1585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1565
WasikeB. (2017). Charismatic rhetoric, integrative complexity and the U.S. Presidency: An analysis of the state of the union address (SOTU) from George Washington to Barack Obama. Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 812–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.04.002
36.
WinterB. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. Retrieved from: arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.5499.
37.
WinterD. G. (2007). The role of motivation, responsibility, and integrative complexity in crisis escalation: comparative studies of war and peace crises. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 920–937. https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.92.5.920
38.
WinterD. G. (2018). What does Trump really want?Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 18(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fasap.12154
39.
WoodardS. R.ChanL.ConwayL. G. (2021). In search of the cognitively complex person: Is there a meaningful trait component of cognitive complexity?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(2), 95–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320972299
40.
ZubrodA.ConwayL. G.IIIConwayK. R.AilanjianD. (2021). Understanding the role of linguistic complexity in famous trial outcomes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(3), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20958439
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
