Vocal cues are used to categorize speakers’ sexual orientation. Hearing a gay-sounding speaker can elicit discrimination. This study investigated whether gay-sounding speakers were discriminated against when applying for a job in Brazil and whether prejudice moderated such an effect. Heterosexual participants listened to a gay- or heterosexual-sounding applicant, rating him in terms of personality traits and employability. The results showed that gay-sounding candidates were discriminated against compared to heterosexual-sounding candidates, but this was true only among highly prejudiced participants.
AltN. P.LickD. J.JohnsonK. L. (2020). The straight categorization bias: A motivated and altruistic reasoning account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1266–1289. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000232
2.
BainhaA.SilvaF. A. (2016). Homofobia nas organizações e a legislação aplicada [Homophobia in organizations and applied legislation]. Revista Borges: Estudos contemporâneos em Ciências Sociais e Aplicadas, 6(1), 50–69.
3.
BlashillA. J.PowlishtaK. K. (2009). Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes. Sex Roles, 61(11), 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9684-7
4.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.RusconiP.CherubiniP.YzerbytV. Y. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x
5.
CarrieriA. P.SouzaE. M.AguiarA. R. C. (2014). Trabalho, violência e sexualidade: Estudo de lésbicas, travestis e transexuais [Work, violence and sexuality: A study of lesbian, transvestites and transexual people]. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552014000100006
6.
Corrêa-RibeiroR.IglesiasF.CamargosE. F. (2019). Attitudes toward lesbians and Gay Men scale: validation in Brazilian physicians. Einstein (São Paulo, 17(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4527
DragojevicM.BerglundC.BlauveltT. K. (2018). Figuring out who’s who: The role of social categorization in the language attitudes process. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X17706942
9.
DragojevicM.FasoliF.CramerJ.RakicT. (2021). Toward a century of language attitudes research: looking back and moving forward. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X20966714
10.
DragojevicM.GilesH.BeckA. C.TatumN. T. (2017). The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 385–405. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213
11.
DragojevicM.Goatley-SoanS. (2020). Americans’ attitudes toward foreign accents: Evaluative hierarchies and underlying processes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1735402
12.
FasoliF.HegartyP. (2020). A leader doesn’t sound lesbian!: The impact of sexual orientation vocal cues on heterosexual persons’ first impression and hiring decision. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0361684319891168
13.
FasoliF.HegartyP.FrostD. M. (2021). Stigmatization of ‘gay-sounding’ voices: The role of heterosexual, lesbian, and gay individuals’ essentialist beliefs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 826–850. http://dx.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12442
14.
FasoliF.MaassA.PaladinoM. P.SulpizioS. (2017). Gay-and lesbian-sounding auditory cues elicit stereotyping and discrimination. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0962-0
15.
FasoliF.MaassA.SulpizioS. (2016). Communication of the “invisible”: The case of sexual orientation. In GilesH.MaassA. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 193–204). Peter Lang Publications.
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
17.
FuertesJ. N.GottdienerW.MartinH.GilbertT. C.GilesH. (2012). A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers’ accents on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 120–133. http://dx.https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.862
18.
GilesH.WilsonP.ConwayT. (1981). Accent and lexical diversity as determinants of impression formation and perceived employment suitability. Language Sciences, 3(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(81)80015-0
19.
HansenK.DovidioJ. F. (2016). Social dominance orientation, nonnative accents, and hiring recommendations. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(4), 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000101
20.
HansenK.RakicT.SteffensM. C. (2014). When actions speak louder than words: preventing discrimination of nonstandard speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(1), 68–77. http://dx.https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13499761
21.
HansenK.RakicT.SteffensM. C. (2018). Foreign-looking native-accented people: more competent when first seen rather than heard. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1948550617732389
22.
HayesA. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
23.
HerekG. M. (1998). The attitudes toward lesbians and gay men (ATLG) scale. In DavisC. M.YarberW. H.BausermanR.SchreerG.DavisS. L. (Eds.), Sexuality-related measures: A compendium (pp. 392–394). Sage Publications.
24.
JuniorA. C.GalvãoC. R. (2021). The first impression is what remains: discrimination in the selection of LGBTQIA+workers in Brazilian organizations. Brazilian Journal of Development, 7(1), 1996–2008. .https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv7n1-136
25.
KachelS.SimpsonA. P.SteffensM. C. (2018). Do I sound straight?”: acoustic correlates of actual and perceived sexual orientation and masculinity/femininity in men’s speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(7), 1560–1578. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0125
26.
KachelS.SteffensM. C.PreußS.SimpsonA. P. (2021). Gender (conformity) matters: cross-dimensional and cross-modal associations in sexual orientation perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 40–66. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X19883902
27.
KranzD.PröbstleK.EvidisA. (2017). Are all the nice guys gay? The impact of sociability and competence on the social perception of male sexual orientation. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(1), 32–39. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/men0000034
28.
LickD. J.JohnsonK. L.RuleN. O.StroessnerS. J. (2019). Perceivers infer base rates from social context to judge perceptually ambiguous social identities. Social Cognition, 37(6), 596–623. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2019.37.6.596
29.
MagnoL.DouradoI.LealA. F.KnauthD.GuimarãesM. D. C.BermúdezX. P. D.RochaG. M.VerasM. A.KendalC.BritoA. M.KerrL. (2020). Discrimination due to sexual orientation and associated factors among men who have sex with men in 12 Brazilian cities: A respondent-driven sampling survey. Research Square, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-115164/v1
30.
MillerA. E. (2018). Searching for gaydar: blind spots in the study of sexual orientation perception. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(3), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1468353
31.
MunsonB.McDonaldE. C.DeBoeN. L.WhiteA. R. (2006). The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men’s sexual orientation from read speech. Journal of Phonetics, 34(2), 202–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.05.003
32.
ParkB.JuddC. M. (2005). Rethinking the link between categorization and prejudice within the social cognition perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 108–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2
33.
PereiraA. S. L. S.DiaS. M. P. S.LimaT. J. S.SouzaL. E. C. (2017). As crenças sobre a homossexualidade e o preconceito contra homossexuais no ambiente de trabalho [beliefs about homosexuality and the prejudice against homosexuals in the workplace]. Temas Em Psicologia, 25(2), 563–575. https://dx.https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2017.2-10
34.
RakićT.SteffensM. C.MummendeyA. (2011a). Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021522
35.
RakićT.SteffensM. C.MummendeyA. (2011b). When it matters how you pronounce it: The influence of regional accents on job interview outcome. British Journal of Psychology, 102(4), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02051.x
36.
RoesselJ.SchoelC.ZimmermannR.StahlbergD. (2019). Shedding new light on the evaluation of accented speakers: basic mechanisms behind nonnative listeners’ evaluations of nonnative accented job candidates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X17747904
37.
SouzaL. E. C.PereiraC. R.CaminoL.LimaT. J. S.TorresA. R. R. (2016). The legitimizing role of accent on discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(5), 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2216
38.
SternC.WestT. V.JostJ. T.RuleN. O. (2013). The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 520–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031187
39.
SulpizioS.FasoliF.MaassA.PaladinoM. P.VespignaniF.EysselF.BentlerD. (2015). The sound of voice: voice-based categorization of speakers’ sexual orientation within and across languages. PLoS ONE, 10(7), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128882
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
