Online excessive gaming has been associated with negative player identity constructions depicting an abnormal life-style. Up-to-date, there is limited insight into player identity management talk about excessive online gaming. To address this gap, drawing from discursive and rhetorical psychology, we investigated naturally occurring talk of 134 players of World of Warcraft (WoW) -a Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game (MMORPG)- from three publicly available websites and of five players from one focus group. The analysis illuminated participants’ dilemmatic and contradictory ways of constructing the player identity, while displaying immersion in the game. Participants invoke identity constructions like ‘nolifer’, ‘hardcore’ or ‘clean’ player, which they disavow or assign to themselves and to each other depending on the conversational context, while attending to concerns about (ab)normalcy. The study’s findings highlight a dynamic process of player identity construction in talk, occasioned by and exemplifying the contingencies of the discursive context.
AarsandP.AronssonK. (2009). Response cries and other gaming moves-building intersubjectivity in gaming. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1557–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.014
BacchiniD.De AngelisG.FanaraA. (2017). Identity formation in adolescent and emerging adult regular players of massively multiplayer online role playing games (MMORPG). Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.045
5.
BadrinarayananV. A.SierraJ. J.MartinK. M. (2015). A dual identification framework of online multiplayer video games: The case of massively multiplayer online role playing games (MMORPGs). Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.006
6.
BarnettJ.CoulsonM. (2010). Virtually real: A psychological perspective on massively multiplayer online games. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019442
7.
BenwellB.StokoeE. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh University Press.
8.
BergstromK.FisherS.JensonJ. (2016). Disavowing ‘that guy’: Identity construction and massively multiplayer online game players. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 22(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514560314
9.
BilligM. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology (Loughborough studies in communication and discourse). Sage.
10.
BilligM. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
11.
BozatzisN. (2009). Occidentalism and accountability: Constructing culture and cultural difference in majority Greek talk about the minority in Western Thrace. Discourse & Society, 20(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104022
ChappellD.EatoughV.DaviesM. N.GriffithsM. (2006). EverQuest-It’s just a computer game, right? An interpretative phenomenological analysis of online gaming addiction. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 4(3), 205–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-006-9028-6
14.
ColeH.GriffithsM. D. (2007). Social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing gamers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9988
EdwardsD.PotterJ. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.23
17.
GilesD.StommelW.PaulusT.LesterJ.ReedD. (2015). Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of ‘digital CA’. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002
GoodingsL.LockeA.BrownS. D. (2007). Social networking technology: Place and identity in mediated communities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(6), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.939
20.
GriffithsM. D.KussD. J.BillieuxJ.PontesH. M. (2016). The evolution of Internet addiction: A global perspective. Addictive Behaviors, 53, 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.001
21.
GueganJ.MolinerP.BuisineS. (2015). Why are online games so self–involving: A social identity analysis of massively multiplayer online role–playing games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2103
22.
HellmanM.KarjalainenS. M.MajamäkiM. (2017). ‘Present yet absent’: Negotiating commitment and intimacy in life with an excessive online role gamer. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1710–1726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816636091
23.
HussainZ.GriffithsM. D. (2009). Excessive use of massively multi-player online role-playing games: A pilot study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7(4), 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9202-8
24.
JeffersonG. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In LernerG. H. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins.
25.
JuulJ. (2010). A casual revolution: Reinventing video games and their players. MIT Press.
26.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage.
27.
KussD. J.LouwsJ.WiersR. W. (2012). Online gaming addiction? Motives predict addictive play behavior in massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(9), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0034
28.
LamerichsJ.Te MolderH. F. (2003). Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society, 5(4), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144480354001
29.
MeredithJ. (2021). Using conversation analysis and discursive psychology to analyze online data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (5th ed, pp. 245–263). Sage.
30.
MMO Populations (2020). Active players over the last year. Yearly population chart. https://mmo-population.com/r/wow.
O' ConnorE. L.LongmanH.WhiteK. M.ObstP. L. (2015). Sense of community, social identity and social support among players of Massively Multiplayer Online Games (MMOGs): A qualitative analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(6), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2224
33.
PaulusT.WarrenA.LesterJ. N. (2016). Applying conversation analysis methods to online talk: A literature review. Discourse, Context & Media, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.04.001
34.
Piirainen-MarshA.TainioL. (2009). Other-repetition as a resource for participation in the activity of playing a video-game. Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00853.x
35.
PintoD. C.RealeG.SegabinazziR.Vargas RossiC. A. (2015). Online identity construction: How gamers redefine their identity in experiential online communities. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 14(6), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1556
36.
PotterJ. (2012). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2. Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 119–138). American Psychological Association.
37.
PulosA. (2013). Confronting heteronormativity in online games: A critical discourse analysis of LGBTQ sexuality in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture, 8(2), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412013478688
38.
SacksH. (1992). Lectures on conversation, Vols, I & II. Blackwell.
39.
SacksH.SchegloffE. A.JeffersonG. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
40.
SampsonE. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.15
41.
ShawA. (2011). Do you identify as a gamer? Gender, race, sexuality and gamer identity. New media & society, 14(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410394
42.
SnodgrassJ. G.DengahH. F.PolzerE.ElseR. (2019). Intensive online videogame involvement: A new global idiom of wellness and distress. Transcultural Psychiatry, 56(4), 748–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461519844356
43.
StapletonK. (2016). Accountable preferences? Discourse, identity, and the anti-prejudice norm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(5), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15615635
44.
StoneJ. A. (2019). Self-identification as a ‘gamer’ among college students: Influencing factors and perceived characteristics. New Media & Society, 21(11-12), 2607–2627. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819854733
45.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
46.
TseliouE.SmoliakO.LaMarreA.Quinn-NilasC. (2019). Discursive psychology as applied science. In O’DohertyK. C.HodgettsD. (Eds.), The sage handbook of applied social psychology (pp. 400–418). Sage.
47.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.
48.
WetherellM. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005
49.
WilkesJ.SpeerS. A. (2021). Reporting micro-aggressions: Kinship carers’ complaints about identity slights. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(3), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20966356
50.
YeeN. (2006). The psychology of massively multi-user online role-playing games: Motivations, emotional investment, relationships and problematic usage. In SchroderR.AxelssonA. (Eds.), Avatars at work and play (pp. 187–207). Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
