In line with discursive work on the role of constructions of minority groups in social exclusion, we offer an examination of talk on immigrants and its links with employment of British residents, in the U.K. Parliament and interview talk with British residents looking for work, in the context of a financial crisis (2007-2009). Discursive analysis of data shows that parliamentarians treat immigration as problematic for British residents’ employment, whereas interviewees’ responses reject or minimally accept this, while displaying sensitivity to the status of this as a prevalent complaint about immigration. Parliamentarians do so to warrant and challenge or manage challenges to Government’s policies, whereas interviewees do so to manage being seen as discriminatory and work-shy. These findings show that constructions of immigration and its links with employment in the context of the financial crisis, and their use in warrants for exclusion are offered in ways to attend to the situated institutional and interactional relevancies in play for interlocutors.
AntakiC.LeudarI. (2001). Recruiting the record: Using the opponents’ exact words in parliamentary argumentation. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 21(4), 467-488.
2.
AntakiC.WetherellM. (1999). Show concessions. Discourse Studies, 1, 7-27.
3.
AugoustinosM.EveryD. (2007). The language of “race” and “prejudice”: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 123-141.
4.
AugoustinosM.TuffinK.EveryD. (2005). New racism, meritocracy and individualism: Constraining affirmative action in education. Discourse & Society, 16, 315-340.
5.
BarkerM. (2001). The new racism. London, England: Junction Books.
6.
BilligM. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
CapdevilaR.CallaghanJ. E. M. (2008). “It’s not racist. It’s commonsense”: A critical analysis of political discourse around asylum and immigration in the UK. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
10.
Charteris-BlackJ. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2006 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17, 563-581.
11.
CondorS. (2010). Sense and sensibility: The conversational etiquette of English national self-identification. In AugheyA.BerberichC. (Eds.), These Englands: A conversation on national identity (pp. 29-55). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
12.
CondorS.FiggouL.AbellJ.GibsonS.StevensonC. (2006). “They’re not racist . . . ” Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 441-462.
13.
CondorS.TileagâC.BilligM. (2013). Political rhetoric. In HuddyL.SearsD. O.LevyJ. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 262-300). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14.
DrewP.SorjonenM. L. (1997). Institutional dialogue. In van DijkT. (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction: Discourse studies volume 2: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 92-118). London, England: Sage.
15.
DurrheimK.GreenerR.WhiteheadK. A. (2014). Race trouble: Attending to race and racism in online interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 84-99.
16.
EdmondsT.JarrettT.WoodhouseJ. (2010). The credit crisis: A timeline. London, England: House of Commons Library.
17.
EdwardsD. (2005). Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies, 7, 5-29.
EssedP. (1991). Understanding everyday racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
GibsonS. (2009). The effortful citizen: Discursive social psychology and welfare reform. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 393-410.
21.
GibsonS. (2011). Dilemmas of citizenship: Young people’s conceptions of un/employment, rights and responsibilities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 450-468.
22.
GibsonS.HamiltonL. (2011). The rhetorical construction of polity membership: Identity, culture and citizenship in young people’s discussions of immigration in northern England. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 228-242.
23.
GoffmanE. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
24.
GoodmanS. (2010). “It’s not racist to impose limits on immigration”: Constructing the boundaries of racism in the asylum and immigration debate. Critical Approaches to Discourse Across Disciplines, 4, 1-17.
25.
GoodmanS.BurkeS. (2011). Discursive deracialization in talk about asylum seeking. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 111-123.
26.
Hanson-EaseyS. A.AugoustinosM. (2012). Narratives from the neighbourhood: The discursive construction of integration problems in talkback radio. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16, 28-55.
27.
HayanoK. (2014). Question design. In SidnellJ.StiversT. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 395-414). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
28.
HeritageJ. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity.
29.
HewittJ. P.StokesR. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40, 1-11.
30.
HoltE. (1996). Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 219-245.
31.
HousleyW.FitzgeraldR. (2009). Membership categorization, culture and norms in action. Discourse & Society, 20, 345-362.
32.
IlieC. (2004). Insulting as a (un)parliamentary practice in British and Swedish parliaments: A rhetorical approach. In BayleyP. (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse (pp. 45-86). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
JeffersonG. (2004). Glossary of transcription symbols with an introduction. In LernerG. H. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-23). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
KirkwoodS.McKinlayA.ChrisM. (2013). “Some people it is very difficult to trust”: Attributions of agency and accountability in practitioners’ talk about integration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 376-389.
37.
KirkwoodS.McKinlayA.McVittieC. (2012). “They are more than animals”: Refugees’ accounts of racially motivated violence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 747-762.
38.
LeCouterA.RapleyM.AugoustinosM. (2001). “This very difficult debate about Wik”: Stake, voice and management of category memberships in race politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 35-57.
McKinlayA.McVittieC. (2008). Social psychology and discourse. Sussex, England: Wiley/Blackwell.
41.
McKinlayA.McVittieC.SambarajuR. (2011). “This is ordinary behavior”: Categorization and culpability in Hamas leaders’ accounts of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 534-550.
42.
McVittieC.McKinlayA.WiddicombeS. (2008). Passive and active non-employment: Age, employment and the identities of older non-working people. Journal of Aging Studies, 22, 248-255.
43.
MollinS. (2007). The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora, 2, 187-210.
44.
MurrayA. (2011). Britain’s points based migration system. London, England: CentreForum.
OmiM.WinantH. (1986). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1980s. New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
47.
PomerantzA. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In AtkinsonJ. M.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
48.
PomerantzA. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-230.
49.
PomerantzA.HeritageJ. (2012). Preference. In SidnellJ.StiversT. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210-228). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
50.
PotterJ. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London, England: Sage.
51.
PotterJ.EdwardsD. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In RobinsonW. P.GilesH. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 103-118). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
52.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 1-27.
53.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2008). Discursive constructionism. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275-293). New York, NY: Guildford.
54.
RaymondG. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939-967.
55.
ReevesF. (1983). British racial discourse: A study of British political discourse about race and race-related matters. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
56.
RoblesJ. S. (2015). Extreme case (re)formulation as a practice for making hearably racist talk repairable. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 390-409.
57.
RogersA.AndersonB.ClarkN. (2009). Recession, vulnerable workers and immigration: Background report. Oxford, England: University of Oxford.
58.
RojoM. L.van DijkT. (1997). Legitimating the expulsion of “illegal” migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society, 8, 523-566.
59.
SacksH. (1992). Lectures on conversation (G. Jefferson, Ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
60.
SchegloffE. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In DrewP.WoottonA. (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89-135). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
61.
SchegloffE. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SchegloffE. A. (2010). Some other “Uh(m)”s. Discourse Processes, 47, 130-174.
63.
SlembrouckS. (1992). The parliamentary Hansard “verbatim” report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature, 1, 101-119.
64.
TalmyS. (2011). The interview as collaborative achievement: Interaction, identity, and ideology in a speech event. Applied Linguistics, 32, 25-42.
TriandafyllidouA. (2000). The political discourse on immigration in southern Europe: A critical analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10, 373-389.
68.
Van Der ValkI. (2003). Right-wing parliamentary discourse on immigration in France. Discourse & Society, 14, 309-348.
69.
van DijkT. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3, 87-118.
70.
van DijkT. (2000a). New(s) racism: A discourse analytic approach. In CottleS. (Ed.), Ethnic minorities and the media (pp. 33-49). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
71.
van DijkT. (2000b). Ideologies, racism, discourse: Debates on immigration and ethnic issues. In VerkuytenM.ter ValJ. (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on racism (pp. 91-116). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
72.
VerkuytenM. (2005). Accounting for ethnic discrimination: A discursive study among minority and majority groups members. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 66-92.
WetherellM.PotterJ. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
75.
WhiteheadK. A. (2015). Everyday antiracism in action: Preference organization in responses to racism. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 374-389.
76.
WiddicombeS. (2015). “Just like the fact that I’m Syrian like you are Scottish”: Ascribing interviewer identities as a resource in cross-cultural interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 255-272.
