Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-9
Where Are You From? An Investigation Into the Intersectionality of Accent Strength and Nationality Status on Perceptions of Nonnative Speakers in Britain
We explore how interpersonal and intergroup perceptions are affected by a nonnative speaker’s accent strength and the status of their home country. When nationality information was absent (Study 1), natives who heard a strong (vs. weak) accent rated the speaker as warmer but immigrants as a group as more threatening. This result was replicated when the speaker’s nationality was familiar (Study 2) but in this study, country status further shaped accent-based perceptions: the strong (vs. weak) accented speaker evoked more positive interpersonal perceptions when her country status was low, but more negative intergroup perceptions when her country status was high. When the status of the speaker’s nationality was manipulated (Study 3), we replicated the interpersonal perceptions found in Study 1 and the intergroup perceptions found in Study 2. Findings support a holistic approach to investigating perceptions of nonnative speakers: one that considers nationality as well as accent strength.
BerryJ. W. (2006). Mutual attitudes among immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.004
3.
BirneyM. E.RabinovichA.MortonT. A.HeathH.AshcroftS. (2020). When speaking English is not enough: The consequences of language-based stigma for nonnative speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19883906
4.
BlinderS. (2013). Imagined immigration: The impact of different meanings of “immigrants” in public opinion and policy debates in Britain. Political Studies, 63(1), 80-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12053
5.
BoydS. (2003). Foreign-born teachers in the multilingual classroom in Sweden: The role of attitudes to foreign accent. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(3-4), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050308667786
6.
CardD.DustmannC.PrestonI. (2012). Immigration, wages, and compositional amenities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(1), 78-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01051.x
7.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum (PhilPapers), 140, 139-167.
8.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476-490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X
9.
DovidioJ. F.GluszekA. (2012). Accents, nonverbal behavior, and intergroup bias. In GilesH. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 87-99). Routledge.
10.
DragojevicM. (2016). Language attitudes as intergroup terrain. In GilesH.MaassA. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 51-66). Peter Lang.
11.
DragojevicM.GilesH. (2014). Language and interpersonal communication: Their intergroup dynamics. In BergerC. R. (Ed.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 29-51). De Gruyter Mouton.
12.
DragojevicM.GilesH.BeckA.TatumN. T. (2017). The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213
13.
DragojevicM.TatumN. T.BeckA.McAninchK. (2019). Effects of accent strength expectancy violations on language attitudes. Communication Studies, 70(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1526815
14.
EdwardsJ. (1982). Language attitudes and their implications among English speakers. In RyanE. B.GilesH. (Eds.), Attitudes toward language variation: Social and applied contexts (pp. 20-33). Edward Arnold.
15.
EssesV. M.DovidioJ. F.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00220
16.
FetzerJ. S. (2000). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States, France and Germany. Cambridge University Press.
17.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
18.
FlowerdewJ. (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “Stigma” tell us?Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.002
19.
FrumkinL. (2007). Influences of accent and ethnic background on perceptions of eyewitness testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(3), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600822246
20.
FuertesJ. N.GottdienerW. H.MartinH.GilbertT. C.GilesH. (2012). A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers’ accents on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.862
GeschkeD.MummendeyA.KesslerT.FunkeF. (2010). Majority members’ acculturation goals as predictors and effects of attitudes and behaviors towards migrants. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X470544
23.
GilesH. (Ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relation-ships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.
24.
GilesH.MarlowM. L. (2011). Theorizing language attitudes existing frameworks, an integrative model, and new directions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 161-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679116
25.
GilesH.WatsonB. (Eds.). (2013). The social meanings of language, dialect, and accent: International perspectives on speech styles. Peter Lang.
26.
GluszekA.DovidioJ. F. (2010a). Speaking with a non-native accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359590
27.
GluszekA.DovidioJ. F. (2010b). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288
28.
GluszekA.NewheiserA. K.DovidioJ. F. (2011). Social psychological orientations and accent strength. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X10387100
29.
HansenK.RakićT.SteffensM. C. (2017). Competent and warm? How mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions. Experimental Psychology, 64(1), https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000348
30.
HaslamS. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations. Sage.
31.
HellwigT.SinnoA. (2017). Different groups, different threats: Public attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(3), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2016.1202749
32.
HosodaM.NguyenL. T.Stone-RomeroE. F. (2012). The effect of Hispanic accents on employment decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(4), 347-364. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683941211220162
33.
JanevicT.PallasS. W.IsmayilovaL.BradleyE. H. (2012). Individual and community level socioeconomic inequalities in contraceptive use in 10 newly independent states: A multilevel cross-sectional analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health, 11(69). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-11-69
KesslerA. E.FreemanG. P. (2005). Public opinion in the EU on immigration from outside the community. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(4), 825-850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2005.00598
36.
KinzlerK. D.ShuttsK.DeJesusJ.SpelkeE. S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623-634. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623
37.
LeeT. L.FiskeS. T. (2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the stereotype content model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 751-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.005
38.
Lev-AriS.KeysarB. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1093-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025
39.
LevonE. (2015). Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12147
40.
LindemannS. (2003). Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3), 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00228
41.
Lippi-GreenR. (1994). Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts. Language in Society, 23(2), 163-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017826
42.
Lippi-GreenR. (1997). English with accents: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
43.
MadduxW. W.GalinskyA. D.CuddyA. J. C.PolifroniM. (2008). When being a model minority is good . . . and bad: Realistic threat explains negativity toward Asian Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207309195
44.
NesdaleD.RooneyR. (1996). Evaluations and stereotyping of accented speakers by pre-adolescent children. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960152002
45.
NguyenB. B.-D. (1993). Accent discrimination and the test of spoken English: A call for an objective assessment of the comprehensibility of non-native speakers. California Law Review, 81(5), 1325-1361. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480920
46.
OECD. (2013). International migration outlook 2013 (Technical report). Author.
47.
PietraszewskiD.SchwartzA. (2014). Evidence that accent is a dedicated dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of coalitional categorization. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.005
48.
RakićT.SteffensM. C.MummendeyA. (2011). Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021522
49.
RoesselJ.SchoelC.StahlbergD. (2020). Modern notions of accent-ism: Findings, conceptualizations, and implications for interventions and research on nonnative accents. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19884619
50.
RosenmannA.ReeseG.CameronJ. E. (2016). Social identities in a globalized world: Challenges and opportunities for collective action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621272
51.
RubinD. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33(4), 511-531. https://doi.org/0.1007/BF00973770
52.
RyanE. B. (1983). Social psychological mechanisms underlying native speaker evaluations of nonnative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004824
53.
ScheepersD. (2009). Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during inter-group competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 228-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.011
54.
ScheepersD.EllemersN. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high-status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.mn2004.06.002
55.
ScheepersD.EllemersN.SintemaartensdijkN. (2009). Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1075-1092. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.609
56.
StephanW. G.RenfroC. L.EssesV. M.StephanC. W.MartinT. (2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes towards immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(1), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-45). Lawrence Eribaum Associates Publishers.
SweeneyE.HuaZ. (2010). Accommodating toward your audience: Do native speakers of English know how to accommodate their communication strategies toward nonnative speakers of English?The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 47(4), 477-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377308
61.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Brooks/Cole.
62.
ZhaoB.OndrichJ.YingerJ. (2006). Why do real estate brokers continue to discriminate? Evidence from the 2000 housing discrimination study. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(3), 394-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.12.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
