Where Are You From? An Investigation Into the Intersectionality of Accent Strength and Nationality Status on Perceptions of Nonnative Speakers in Britain

Abstract

We explore how interpersonal and intergroup perceptions are affected by a nonnative speaker’s accent strength and the status of their home country. When nationality information was absent (Study 1), natives who heard a strong (vs. weak) accent rated the speaker as warmer but immigrants as a group as more threatening. This result was replicated when the speaker’s nationality was familiar (Study 2) but in this study, country status further shaped accent-based perceptions: the strong (vs. weak) accented speaker evoked more positive interpersonal perceptions when her country status was low, but more negative intergroup perceptions when her country status was high. When the status of the speaker’s nationality was manipulated (Study 3), we replicated the interpersonal perceptions found in Study 1 and the intergroup perceptions found in Study 2. Findings support a holistic approach to investigating perceptions of nonnative speakers: one that considers nationality as well as accent strength.

Keywords

accent perception interpersonal perceptions immigration intergroup relations communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BBC. (May, 2009). The results. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/uk/2002/race/survey.stm

Berry

J. W.

(2006). Mutual attitudes among immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.004

Birney

M. E.

Rabinovich

Morton

T. A.

Heath

Ashcroft

(2020). When speaking English is not enough: The consequences of language-based stigma for nonnative speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19883906

Blinder

(2013). Imagined immigration: The impact of different meanings of “immigrants” in public opinion and policy debates in Britain. Political Studies, 63(1), 80-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12053

Boyd

(2003). Foreign-born teachers in the multilingual classroom in Sweden: The role of attitudes to foreign accent. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(3-4), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050308667786

Card

Dustmann

Preston

(2012). Immigration, wages, and compositional amenities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(1), 78-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01051.x

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum (PhilPapers), 140, 139-167.

Derwing

T. M.

Munro

M. J.

(2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476-490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X

Dovidio

J. F.

Gluszek

(2012). Accents, nonverbal behavior, and intergroup bias. In Giles

(Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 87-99). Routledge.

10.

Dragojevic

(2016). Language attitudes as intergroup terrain. In Giles

Maass

(Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 51-66). Peter Lang.

11.

Dragojevic

Giles

(2014). Language and interpersonal communication: Their intergroup dynamics. In Berger

C. R.

(Ed.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 29-51). De Gruyter Mouton.

12.

Dragojevic

Giles

Beck

Tatum

N. T.

(2017). The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213

13.

Dragojevic

Tatum

N. T.

Beck

McAninch

(2019). Effects of accent strength expectancy violations on language attitudes. Communication Studies, 70(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1526815

14.

Edwards

(1982). Language attitudes and their implications among English speakers. In Ryan

E. B.

Giles

(Eds.), Attitudes toward language variation: Social and applied contexts (pp. 20-33). Edward Arnold.

15.

Esses

V. M.

Dovidio

J. F.

Jackson

L. M.

Armstrong

T. L.

(2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00220

16.

Fetzer

J. S.

(2000). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States, France and Germany. Cambridge University Press.

17.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

Glick

(2002). (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

18.

Flowerdew

(2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “Stigma” tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.002

19.

Frumkin

(2007). Influences of accent and ethnic background on perceptions of eyewitness testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(3), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600822246

20.

Fuertes

J. N.

Gottdiener

W. H.

Martin

Gilbert

T. C.

Giles

(2012). A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers’ accents on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.862

21.

Gallup. (2019). Immigration. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1660/immigration.aspx

22.

Geschke

Mummendey

Kessler

Funke

(2010). Majority members’ acculturation goals as predictors and effects of attitudes and behaviors towards migrants. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X470544

23.

Giles

(Ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relation-ships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.

24.

Giles

Marlow

M. L.

(2011). Theorizing language attitudes existing frameworks, an integrative model, and new directions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 161-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679116

25.

Giles

Watson

(Eds.). (2013). The social meanings of language, dialect, and accent: International perspectives on speech styles. Peter Lang.

26.

Gluszek

Dovidio

J. F.

(2010a). Speaking with a non-native accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359590

27.

Gluszek

Dovidio

J. F.

(2010b). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288

28.

Gluszek

Newheiser

A. K.

Dovidio

J. F.

(2011). Social psychological orientations and accent strength. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X10387100

29.

Hansen

Rakić

Steffens

M. C.

(2017). Competent and warm? How mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions. Experimental Psychology, 64(1), https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000348

30.

Haslam

S. A.

(2004). Psychology in organizations. Sage.

31.

Hellwig

Sinno

(2017). Different groups, different threats: Public attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(3), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2016.1202749

32.

Hosoda

Nguyen

L. T.

Stone-Romero

E. F.

(2012). The effect of Hispanic accents on employment decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(4), 347-364. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683941211220162

33.

Janevic

Pallas

S. W.

Ismayilova

Bradley

E. H.

(2012). Individual and community level socioeconomic inequalities in contraceptive use in 10 newly independent states: A multilevel cross-sectional analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health, 11(69). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-11-69

34.

Joppke

(2004). The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: Theory and policy. British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00017

35.

Kessler

A. E.

Freeman

G. P.

(2005). Public opinion in the EU on immigration from outside the community. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(4), 825-850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2005.00598

36.

Kinzler

K. D.

Shutts

DeJesus

Spelke

E. S.

(2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623-634. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623

37.

Lee

T. L.

Fiske

S. T.

(2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the stereotype content model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 751-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.005

38.

Lev-Ari

Keysar

(2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1093-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025

39.

Levon

(2015). Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12147

40.

Lindemann

(2003). Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3), 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00228

41.

Lippi-Green

(1994). Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts. Language in Society, 23(2), 163-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017826

42.

Lippi-Green

(1997). English with accents: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.

43.

Maddux

W. W.

Galinsky

A. D.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Polifroni

(2008). When being a model minority is good . . . and bad: Realistic threat explains negativity toward Asian Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207309195

44.

Nesdale

Rooney

(1996). Evaluations and stereotyping of accented speakers by pre-adolescent children. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960152002

45.

Nguyen

B. B.-D.

(1993). Accent discrimination and the test of spoken English: A call for an objective assessment of the comprehensibility of non-native speakers. California Law Review, 81(5), 1325-1361. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480920

46.

OECD. (2013). International migration outlook 2013 (Technical report). Author.

47.

Pietraszewski

Schwartz

(2014). Evidence that accent is a dedicated dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of coalitional categorization. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.005

48.

Rakić

Steffens

M. C.

Mummendey

(2011). Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021522

49.

Roessel

Schoel

Stahlberg

(2020). Modern notions of accent-ism: Findings, conceptualizations, and implications for interventions and research on nonnative accents. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19884619

50.

Rosenmann

Reese

Cameron

J. E.

(2016). Social identities in a globalized world: Challenges and opportunities for collective action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621272

51.

Rubin

D. L.

(1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33(4), 511-531. https://doi.org/0.1007/BF00973770

52.

Ryan

E. B.

(1983). Social psychological mechanisms underlying native speaker evaluations of nonnative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004824

53.

Scheepers

(2009). Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during inter-group competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 228-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.011

54.

Scheepers

Ellemers

(2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high-status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.mn2004.06.002

55.

Scheepers

Ellemers

Sintemaartensdijk

(2009). Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1075-1092. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.609

56.

Stephan

W. G.

Renfro

C. L.

Esses

V. M.

Stephan

C. W.

Martin

(2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes towards immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(1), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011

57.

Stephan

W. G.

Stephan

C. W.

(1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(3-4), 409-426. http://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(96)00026-0

58.

Stephan

W. G.

Stephan

C. W.

(2000). An integrated theory of prejudice. In Oskamp

(Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-45). Lawrence Eribaum Associates Publishers.

59.

Stephan

W. G.

Ybarra

Bachman

(1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2221-2237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15591816.1999.tb00107

60.

Sweeney

Hua

(2010). Accommodating toward your audience: Do native speakers of English know how to accommodate their communication strategies toward nonnative speakers of English? The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 47(4), 477-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377308

61.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin

W. G.

Worchel

(Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Brooks/Cole.

62.

Zhao

Ondrich

Yinger

(2006). Why do real estate brokers continue to discriminate? Evidence from the 2000 housing discrimination study. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(3), 394-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.12.001

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.24 MB